REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
REIT - Residential
REIT - Retail
ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $2.78B | $122M | $756M | $5.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $207M | $486M | $99M | $252M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65M | $108M | $12M | $-32M | $115M |
| Gross Margin | 46.5% | 25.3% | 66.8% | 91.1% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 41.8% | 29.0% | 38.8% | 11.5% | 37.6% |
| Forward P/E | 31.1x | 47.5x | — | — | 53.8x |
| Total Debt | $506M | $1.67B | $484M | $1.56B | $2.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $49M | $24M | $14M | $4M |
ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander & Baldwin… (ALEX) | 100 | 119.3 | +19.3% |
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 68.7 | -31.3% |
| Phillips Edison & C… (PECO) | 100 | 683.1 | +583.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 51.2%, current ratio 1.01x
- PEG 0.49 vs PECO's 0.69
- Beta 0.27, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.01x
- Lower P/E (31.1x vs 53.8x), PEG 0.49 vs 0.69
UE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, WHLR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ALEX's 4.3%
PECO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 74.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- 10.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ALEX's -12.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ALEX's -12.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.1x vs 53.8x), PEG 0.49 vs 0.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ALEX's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.9% vs WHLR's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 3.5% vs 1.1% |
ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UE leads in 2 of 6 categories
WHLR leads 2 • ALEX leads 1 • NXRT leads 1 • PECO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PECO is the larger business by revenue, generating $739M annually — 7.4x WHLR's $99M. ALEX is the more profitable business, keeping 31.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, UE holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $207M | $486M | $99M | $252M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $110M | $276M | $62M | $125M | $542M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $65M | $108M | $12M | -$32M | $115M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | $189M | $4M | $79M | $207M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.5% | +25.3% | +66.8% | +91.1% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.8% | +29.0% | +38.8% | +11.5% | +37.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +22.2% | +11.9% | -12.7% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +38.9% | +4.0% | +31.2% | +28.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | +12.2% | -8.8% | +0.5% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -69.5% | +157.1% | -100.0% | 0.0% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WHLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, ALEX trades at a 48% valuation discount to PECO's 45.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALEX offers better value at 0.37x vs PECO's 0.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $2.8B | $122M | $756M | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $4.4B | $582M | $2.3B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.42x | 29.78x | -0.03x | -23.65x | 45.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.10x | 47.53x | — | — | 53.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.32x | 16.55x | 9.79x | 18.60x | 16.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.34x | 5.88x | 1.21x | 3.01x | 6.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 2.02x | 1.29x | 2.52x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.58x | 15.20x | 30.27x | 9.05x | 23.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLR delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. ALEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +7.8% | +12.5% | -10.1% | +4.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +3.2% | +1.9% | -1.7% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +3.2% | +4.9% | +1.1% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +3.9% | +6.0% | +1.5% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.21x | 5.11x | 5.18x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $495M | $1.6B | $460M | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $49M | $24M | $14M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $506M | $1.7B | $484M | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.13x | 2.28x | 1.44x | 0.47x | 2.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PECO five years ago would be worth $74,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, ALEX leads with a +24.9% total return vs WHLR's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UE at 18.6% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +16.5% | -93.3% | +2.6% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | +23.9% | -99.8% | -15.2% | +16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.9% | +66.7% | -100.0% | -15.5% | +44.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.4% | +31.8% | -100.0% | -23.0% | +640.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.5% | +6.1% | +100.2% | +211.1% | +693.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.3% | +18.6% | -99.0% | -5.5% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ALEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALEX currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.48x | 2.39x | 0.62x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.02 | $22.26 | $904.50 | $38.30 | $40.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.07 | $17.46 | $1.03 | $23.79 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +99.0% | +0.1% | +77.8% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 61.6 | 22.9 | 71.0 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 891K | 219K | 216K | 822K |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALEX as "Buy", UE as "Hold", WHLR as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", PECO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.5% upside for ALEX (target: $21) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs PECO's 2.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.95 | $21.00 | — | $27.00 | $39.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +3.4% | +5.4% | +7.1% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $0.76 | $0.06 | $2.11 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
UE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WHLR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
ALEX vs UE vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO?
On trailing P/E, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 's 0. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) delivered a total return of +640. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PECO returned +693. 0% versus UE's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning WHLR is approximately 792% more volatile than ALEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WHLR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO?
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLR leads at 36. 4% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 's 0. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) trades at 31. 1x forward P/E versus 53. 8x for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALEX: 0. 5% to $20. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 2. 8% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO).
09Is ALEX or UE or WHLR or NXRT or PECO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 2. 8% yield, +693. 0% 10Y return). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PECO: +693. 0%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALEX and UE and WHLR and NXRT and PECO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALEX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WHLR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.