Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $37M | $108.10B | $73.68B | $12.56B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $12.26B | $14.92B | $1.06B | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $4.34B | $4.42B | $-327M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 86.3% | 84.5% | 98.3% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | -51.0% | 39.0% | 24.3% | -33.3% | -6.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 15.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3.88B | $2.71B | $2.61B | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $5.09B | $3.12B | $372M | $155M |
ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aligos Therapeutics… (ALGS) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 130.5 | +30.5% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 161.9 | +61.9% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 57.3 | -42.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VRTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 382.6% 10Y total return vs IONS's 121.1%
- 35.4% margin vs ALGS's -48.2%
- 17.1% ROA vs ALGS's -90.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -163.0%
REGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.43 vs VRTX's 2.68
- Beta 0.81, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.13x
- Better valuation composite
IONS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.55
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 33.9% revenue growth vs ALGS's -44.6%
- Beta 0.55 vs NTLA's 2.37
Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs ALGS's -44.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs ALGS's -48.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs NTLA's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs VRTX's -2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs ALGS's -90.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -163.0% |
ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
IONS leads 2 • REGN leads 1 • ALGS leads 0 • NTLA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.9B annually — 7957.1x ALGS's $2M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALGS's -48.2%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $12.3B | $14.9B | $1.1B | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$94M | $4.9B | $4.2B | $4.5B | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | $4.3B | $4.4B | -$327M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$85M | $3.7B | $4.2B | -$971M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +86.3% | +84.5% | +98.3% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -51.0% | +39.0% | +24.3% | -33.3% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -48.2% | +35.4% | +29.6% | -30.9% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.4% | +30.3% | +27.9% | -91.8% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +7.8% | +19.0% | +87.0% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +61.4% | -7.2% | +39.8% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 38% valuation discount to VRTX's 27.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.70x vs VRTX's 3.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $108.1B | $73.7B | $12.6B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $106.9B | $73.3B | $14.8B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.46x | 27.74x | 17.09x | -31.94x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.18x | 15.35x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.35x | 2.70x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.52x | 17.78x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.07x | 8.95x | 5.14x | 13.31x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 5.87x | 2.46x | 24.87x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.85x | 18.06x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX delivers a 23.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-139 for ALGS. REGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -139.5% | +23.9% | +14.3% | -58.6% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -90.6% | +17.1% | +11.1% | -10.1% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -163.0% | +23.0% | +8.9% | -12.8% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -152.1% | +23.1% | +10.2% | -14.1% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.21x | 0.09x | 5.35x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$1.2B | -$412M | $2.2B | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $5.1B | $3.1B | $372M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3.9B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 488.09x | 108.44x | -3.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $20,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $89 for ALGS. Over the past 12 months, IONS leads with a +129.9% total return vs VRTX's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 29.3% vs ALGS's -41.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.0% | -6.0% | -8.5% | -4.6% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.3% | -2.3% | +27.1% | +129.9% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.4% | +23.5% | -5.1% | +116.1% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +97.7% | +43.6% | +108.0% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +382.6% | +90.0% | +121.1% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.9% | +7.3% | -1.7% | +29.3% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
IONS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IONS currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs ALGS's 44.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 0.82x | 0.81x | 0.55x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.69 | $507.92 | $821.11 | $86.74 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $362.50 | $476.49 | $31.66 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.0% | +83.7% | +86.4% | +87.6% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 43.2 | 44.9 | 58.8 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 1.2M | 631K | 2.0M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VRTX as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.3% upside for NTLA (target: $21) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $552.27 | $865.68 | $107.27 | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 56 | 48 | 32 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +5.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IONS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
ALGS vs VRTX vs REGN vs IONS vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -44. 6% for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to -99. 1% for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTX returned +382. 6% versus ALGS's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 334% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -44. 6% for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IONS leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -1106. 7% for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -40. 2% for ALGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTLA: 52. 3% to $20. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ALGS, VRTX, IONS, NTLA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALGS or VRTX or REGN or IONS or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), +121. 1% 10Y return). Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +121. 1%, ALGS: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALGS and VRTX and REGN and IONS and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.