Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALIT vs CNXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
ALIT vs CNXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $455M | $1.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.25B | $2.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.09B | $87M |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 3.0x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.00B | $996K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273M | $193M |
ALIT vs CNXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alight, Inc. (ALIT) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) | 100 | 149.5 | +49.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALIT vs CNXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALIT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 18.8%
- Lower P/E (3.0x vs 16.6x)
- 18.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CNXN's 0.9%
CNXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- 199.0% 10Y total return vs ALIT's -89.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.90x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs ALIT's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.0x vs 16.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs ALIT's -137.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs ALIT's 1.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CNXN's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.4% vs ALIT's -81.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs ALIT's -58.3%, ROIC 10.6% vs 0.6% |
ALIT vs CNXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALIT vs CNXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNXN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNXN and ALIT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and $2.2B in trailing revenue. CNXN is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALIT's -137.5%. On growth, CNXN holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.1B | $87M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $259M | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -137.5% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ALIT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALIT's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNXN's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $455M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | 19.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.97x | 16.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 12.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.82x | 28.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNXN leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNXN delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-172 for ALIT. CNXN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALIT's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNXN scores 5/9 vs ALIT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -171.7% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.92x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | -$192M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $273M | $193M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $996,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNXN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNXN five years ago would be worth $14,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,062 for ALIT. Over the past 12 months, CNXN leads with a -2.4% total return vs ALIT's -81.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNXN at 19.8% vs ALIT's -50.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.8% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.1% | -2.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.2% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | +45.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +199.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.9% | +19.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CNXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNXN is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALIT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNXN currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs ALIT's 14.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.11 | $71.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $54.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.2% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34.3M | 66K |
Analyst Outlook
ALIT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALIT as "Buy" and CNXN as "Buy". For income investors, ALIT offers the higher dividend yield at 18.77% vs CNXN's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.8% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.3% | +4.6% |
CNXN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALIT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
ALIT vs CNXN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALIT or CNXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Alight, Inc. (ALIT). PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alight, Inc. (ALIT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALIT or CNXN?
On forward P/E, Alight, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 3. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALIT or CNXN?
Over the past 5 years, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) delivered a total return of +45. 1%, compared to -89. 4% for Alight, Inc. (ALIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNXN returned +199. 0% versus ALIT's -89. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALIT or CNXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Alight, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning ALIT is approximately 59% more volatile than CNXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 192% for Alight, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALIT or CNXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -3. 0% for Alight, Inc. (ALIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PC Connection, Inc. grew EPS -0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1924. 1% for Alight, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALIT leads at 0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALIT or CNXN?
PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -136. 9% for Alight, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNXN leads at 3. 6% versus 1. 5% for ALIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALIT leads at 20. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALIT or CNXN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alight, Inc.
(ALIT) trades at 3. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for PC Connection, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALIT or CNXN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alight, Inc. (ALIT) offers the highest yield at 18. 8%, versus 0. 9% for PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN).
09Is ALIT or CNXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 0. 9% yield, +199. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXN: +199. 0%, ALIT: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALIT and CNXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALIT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.