Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $4.65B | $316.20B | $238.07B | $47.75B | $32.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.24B | $48.35B | $90.37B | $63.36B | $60.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $100M | $8.66B | $7.26B | $5.01B | $3.67B |
| Gross Margin | 59.7% | 34.8% | 20.2% | 24.5% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 18.5% | 10.4% | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 46.7x | 40.0x | 25.5x | 13.6x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $6.89B | $20.49B | $39.51B | $21.08B | $31.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $627M | $12.39B | $7.43B | $4.31B | $5.94B |
ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska Air Group, I… (ALK) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 925.2 | +825.2% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 290.0 | +190.0% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 355.6 | +255.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 21.3% revenue growth vs DAL's 2.8%
GE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 17.9% margin vs ALK's 0.7%
- 6.8% ROA vs ALK's 0.5%, ROIC 24.7% vs 2.3%
RTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.5%
- 234.7% 10Y total return vs GE's 121.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.03x
DAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +63.0% vs ALK's -19.1%
UAL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 25.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.3% revenue growth vs DAL's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs ALK's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs UAL's 2.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.0% vs ALK's -19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs ALK's 0.5%, ROIC 24.7% vs 2.3% |
ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GE leads in 3 of 6 categories
RTX leads 1 • ALK leads 0 • DAL leads 0 • UAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 6.3x ALK's $14.2B. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALK's 0.7%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $48.4B | $90.4B | $63.4B | $60.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $9.9B | $13.8B | $8.9B | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $100M | $8.7B | $7.3B | $5.0B | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$339M | $7.5B | $8.4B | $3.8B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.7% | +34.8% | +20.2% | +24.5% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +18.5% | +10.4% | +9.2% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +17.9% | +8.0% | +7.9% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +15.4% | +9.2% | +6.1% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +24.7% | +8.7% | +2.9% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.3% | -1.1% | +32.5% | +44.2% | +84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALK and DAL and UAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, DAL trades at a 80% valuation discount to ALK's 46.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UAL's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GE's 32.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $316.2B | $238.1B | $47.8B | $32.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.9B | $324.3B | $270.1B | $64.5B | $57.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.67x | 37.09x | 35.64x | 9.54x | 9.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.02x | 25.54x | 13.58x | 10.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.14x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.95x | 32.46x | 20.96x | 7.81x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 6.90x | 2.69x | 0.75x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 17.09x | 3.57x | 2.30x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.53x | 29.98x | 12.43x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $2 for ALK. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UAL's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs DAL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +45.8% | +10.9% | +24.1% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +6.8% | +4.3% | +6.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +24.7% | +6.7% | +12.0% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +9.6% | +7.9% | +11.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.67x | 1.08x | 0.59x | 1.02x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | $8.1B | $32.1B | $16.8B | $25.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $627M | $12.4B | $7.4B | $4.3B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.9B | $20.5B | $39.5B | $21.1B | $31.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.05x | 11.69x | 5.58x | 9.69x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,979 for ALK. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +63.0% total return vs ALK's -19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 56.0% vs ALK's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | -5.5% | -5.2% | +6.1% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.1% | +44.9% | +40.8% | +63.0% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.6% | +280.0% | +93.0% | +118.3% | +117.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.2% | +362.5% | +120.1% | +61.9% | +82.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.6% | +121.0% | +234.7% | +87.4% | +118.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +56.0% | +24.5% | +29.7% | +29.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RTX and DAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs ALK's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 1.14x | 0.51x | 1.93x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.88 | $348.48 | $214.50 | $76.39 | $119.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.03 | $208.22 | $126.03 | $44.78 | $71.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +86.8% | +82.4% | +95.7% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 56.4 | 37.3 | 64.2 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 5.7M | 5.3M | 12.2M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALK as "Buy", GE as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", UAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.0% upside for ALK (target: $67) vs 12.8% for DAL (target: $82). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $386.20 | $224.89 | $82.45 | $136.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 34 | 26 | 44 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.5% | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 | $2.63 | $0.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
GE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RTX leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
ALK vs GE vs RTX vs DAL vs UAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is the stronger pick with 21. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL?
On trailing P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Alaska Air Group, Inc. at 46. 7x. On forward P/E, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -40. 2% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +234. 7% versus ALK's -33. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning UAL is approximately 342% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 2% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is pulling ahead at 21. 3% versus 2. 8% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -71. 8% for Alaska Air Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 0. 7% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 2. 1% for ALK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAL leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALK: 65. 0% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL?
In this comparison, RTX (1.
5% yield), DAL (0. 9% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ALK, UAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALK or GE or RTX or DAL or UAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 5% yield, +234. 7% 10Y return). Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +234. 7%, ALK: -33. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALK and GE and RTX and DAL and UAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. RTX, DAL pay a dividend while ALK, GE, UAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.