Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Consumer Electronics | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $439M | $4.31T | $2.14T | $230.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $451.44B | $3.82T | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $122.58B | $1.72T | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | 47.9% | 59.9% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -105.0% | 32.6% | 50.8% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.7x | 0.8x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $941K | $112.38B | $990.36B | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $35.93B | $2.76T | $7.84B |
ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) | 100 | 1162.4 | +1062.4% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 198.1 | +98.1% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 100 | 496.1 | +396.1% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 173.2 | +73.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALMU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 407.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
AAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and efficiency is your priority.
- Beta 1.04 vs ALMU's 2.89
- 34.0% ROA vs ALMU's -6.4%, ROIC 67.4% vs -18.6%
TSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.0%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 17.3% 10Y total return vs ALMU's 11.2%
- PEG 0.03 vs QCOM's 9.80
- Lower P/E (0.8x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.89
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 77.2%, current ratio 2.82x
- Beta 1.64, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
- 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TSM's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 407.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.1% margin vs ALMU's -52.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs ALMU's 2.89 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TSM's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.8% vs AAPL's +49.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs ALMU's -6.4%, ROIC 67.4% vs -18.6% |
ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
AAPL leads 2 • TSM leads 1 • ALMU leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 730374.1x ALMU's $5M. TSM is the more profitable business, keeping 45.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALMU's -52.5%. On growth, TSM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $451.4B | $3.82T | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $160.0B | $2.79T | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $122.6B | $1.72T | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$772,780 | $129.2B | $1.02T | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | +47.9% | +59.9% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | +32.6% | +50.8% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -52.5% | +27.2% | +45.1% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.8% | +28.6% | +26.7% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.1% | +16.6% | +21.6% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.2% | +21.8% | +42.0% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.6x trailing earnings, TSM trades at a 12% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TSM offers better value at 1.39x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $439M | $4.31T | $2.14T | $230.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $4.38T | $2.08T | $239.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -106.13x | 39.31x | 38.58x | 43.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.71x | 0.82x | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.20x | 1.39x | 21.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 30.27x | 24.59x | 17.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 94.20x | 10.35x | 17.40x | 5.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.96x | 59.68x | 12.30x | 11.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.59x | 61.01x | 18.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ALMU. ALMU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs QCOM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | +146.7% | +31.6% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +34.0% | +21.8% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.6% | +67.4% | +42.7% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.5% | +69.6% | +33.0% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.52x | 0.18x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $76.4B | -$1.77T | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $35.9B | $2.76T | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $941,000 | $112.4B | $990.4B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.00x | — | 315.91x | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALMU five years ago would be worth $122,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,229 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, TSM leads with a +136.8% total return vs AAPL's +49.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALMU at 82.7% vs AAPL's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.1% | +8.3% | +29.1% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.2% | +49.0% | +136.8% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +510.3% | +70.8% | +389.0% | +111.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1120.5% | +134.8% | +275.1% | +82.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1120.5% | +1199.3% | +1729.1% | +382.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.7% | +19.5% | +69.7% | +28.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALMU's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs ALMU's 85.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 1.04x | 1.90x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.73 | $294.76 | $420.00 | $228.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.20 | $193.46 | $173.66 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +99.5% | +98.0% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 69.3 | 65.5 | 82.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 40.0M | 13.3M | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALMU as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", TSM as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for AAPL (target: $319) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.57% vs AAPL's 0.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $319.44 | $427.50 | $185.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 110 | 25 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 | 5 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 | $90.94 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
QCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AAPL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) is the stronger pick with 407. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the better valuation at 38. 6x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the cheapest at 38.
6x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0. 03x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) delivered a total return of +1121%, compared to +82. 3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSM returned +1729% versus QCOM's +382. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Aeluma, Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning ALMU is approximately 178% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) is pulling ahead at 407. 9% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited grew EPS 49. 8% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSM leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
1% net margin versus -64. 8% for Aeluma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSM leads at 50. 8% versus -45. 9% for ALMU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Apple Inc. — 32. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AAPL: 8. 9% to $319. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
6% yield), TSM (0. 7% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ALMU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1199% 10Y return). Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1199%, ALMU: +1120%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALMU and AAPL and TSM and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALMU is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TSM is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TSM, QCOM pay a dividend while ALMU, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.