Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$439M
5Y Perf.+1062.4%
AAPL
Apple Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31T
5Y Perf.+98.1%
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • TW
Market Cap$2.14T
5Y Perf.+396.1%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$230.92B
5Y Perf.+73.2%

ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALMU logoALMU
AAPL logoAAPL
TSM logoTSM
QCOM logoQCOM
IndustrySemiconductorsConsumer ElectronicsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$439M$4.31T$2.14T$230.92B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$451.44B$3.82T$44.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$122.58B$1.72T$9.92B
Gross Margin50.2%47.9%59.9%54.8%
Operating Margin-105.0%32.6%50.8%25.5%
Forward P/E33.7x0.8x20.4x
Total Debt$941K$112.38B$990.36B$16.37B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$35.93B$2.76T$7.84B

ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALMU
AAPL
TSM
QCOM
StockNov 22May 26Return
Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU)1001162.4+1062.4%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100198.1+98.1%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)100496.1+396.1%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100173.2+73.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TSM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Apple Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ALMU and QCOM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc.
The Growth Leader

ALMU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 407.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
Best for: growth
AAPL
Apple Inc.
The Defensive Choice

AAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and efficiency is your priority.

  • Beta 1.04 vs ALMU's 2.89
  • 34.0% ROA vs ALMU's -6.4%, ROIC 67.4% vs -18.6%
Best for: stability and efficiency
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Growth Play

TSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 33.0%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
  • 17.3% 10Y total return vs ALMU's 11.2%
  • PEG 0.03 vs QCOM's 9.80
  • Lower P/E (0.8x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.89
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Income Pick

QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 77.2%, current ratio 2.82x
  • Beta 1.64, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
  • 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TSM's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALMU logoALMU407.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
ValueTSM logoTSMLower P/E (0.8x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.89
Quality / MarginsTSM logoTSM45.1% margin vs ALMU's -52.5%
Stability / SafetyAAPL logoAAPLBeta 1.04 vs ALMU's 2.89
DividendsQCOM logoQCOM1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TSM's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TSM logoTSM+136.8% vs AAPL's +49.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AAPL logoAAPL34.0% ROA vs ALMU's -6.4%, ROIC 67.4% vs -18.6%

ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALMUAeluma, Inc.
FY 2024
Sampling Purchases Member
100.0%$64,756
AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
FY 2024
Other Products
100.0%$379.8B
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B

ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAAPLLAGGINGTSM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 730374.1x ALMU's $5M. TSM is the more profitable business, keeping 45.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALMU's -52.5%. On growth, TSM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$451.4B$3.82T$44.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$160.0B$2.79T$12.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3M$122.6B$1.72T$9.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$772,780$129.2B$1.02T$12.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.2%+47.9%+59.9%+54.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-105.0%+32.6%+50.8%+25.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-52.5%+27.2%+45.1%+22.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.8%+28.6%+26.7%+28.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.1%+16.6%+21.6%-3.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.2%+21.8%+42.0%+173.0%
TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 38.6x trailing earnings, TSM trades at a 12% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TSM offers better value at 1.39x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Market CapShares × price$439M$4.31T$2.14T$230.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$437M$4.38T$2.08T$239.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-106.13x39.31x38.58x43.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.33.71x0.82x20.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.20x1.39x21.03x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.27x24.59x17.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue94.20x10.35x17.40x5.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.96x59.68x12.30x11.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.59x61.01x18.01x
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ALMU. ALMU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs QCOM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.7%+146.7%+31.6%+40.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%+34.0%+21.8%+18.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.6%+67.4%+42.7%+29.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.5%+69.6%+33.0%+28.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96886
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x1.52x0.18x0.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$76.4B-$1.77T$8.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$35.9B$2.76T$7.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$941,000$112.4B$990.4B$16.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.00x315.91x17.60x
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ALMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALMU five years ago would be worth $122,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,229 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, TSM leads with a +136.8% total return vs AAPL's +49.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALMU at 82.7% vs AAPL's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.1%+8.3%+29.1%+27.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+94.2%+49.0%+136.8%+53.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+510.3%+70.8%+389.0%+111.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1120.5%+134.8%+275.1%+82.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1120.5%+1199.3%+1729.1%+382.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+82.7%+19.5%+69.7%+28.4%
ALMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALMU's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs ALMU's 85.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.89x1.04x1.90x1.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.73$294.76$420.00$228.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.20$193.46$173.66$121.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.0%+99.5%+98.0%+96.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.369.365.582.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M40.0M13.3M15.6M
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ALMU as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", TSM as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for AAPL (target: $319) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.57% vs AAPL's 0.35%.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$319.44$427.50$185.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts11102569
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.7%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14523
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.03$90.94$3.44
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%0.0%+3.8%
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

QCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AAPL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallApple Inc. (AAPL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALMU vs AAPL vs TSM vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) is the stronger pick with 407. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the better valuation at 38. 6x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?

On trailing P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the cheapest at 38.

6x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0. 03x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?

Over the past 5 years, Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) delivered a total return of +1121%, compared to +82. 3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSM returned +1729% versus QCOM's +382. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Aeluma, Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning ALMU is approximately 178% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) is pulling ahead at 407. 9% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited grew EPS 49. 8% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSM leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more profitable company, earning 45.

1% net margin versus -64. 8% for Aeluma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSM leads at 50. 8% versus -45. 9% for ALMU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Apple Inc. — 32. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AAPL: 8. 9% to $319. 44.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM?

In this comparison, QCOM (1.

6% yield), TSM (0. 7% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ALMU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ALMU or AAPL or TSM or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1199% 10Y return). Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1199%, ALMU: +1120%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALMU and AAPL and TSM and QCOM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALMU is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TSM is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TSM, QCOM pay a dividend while ALMU, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ALMU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAPL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TSM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QCOM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ALMU and AAPL and TSM and QCOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ALMU: -21.1% · AAPL: 16.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.