Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Staffing & Employment Services
Information Technology Services
ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $265M | $1.74B | $1.44B | $790M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.82B | $1.14B | $951M | $1.33B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-79M | $141M | $133M | $35M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 59.2% | 46.4% | 27.2% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 19.5% | 19.1% | 3.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.3x | 6.0x | 18.0x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $1.12B | $1.13B | $70M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $759M | $306M | $2M | $599M |
ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Equipment Grou… (ALTG) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB) | 100 | 64.5 | -35.5% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALTG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +80.5% vs BLKB's -39.8%
BLKB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.10 vs EVTC's 0.66
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.10 vs 0.31
EVTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 10.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 13.9% margin vs ALTG's -4.3%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs EVTC's 89.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
Among these 5 stocks, FIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.10 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs ALTG's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ALTG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ALTG's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs BLKB's -39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs ALTG's -5.7%, ROIC 19.1% vs 1.4% |
ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLKB leads 1 • ALTG leads 0 • EVTC leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLKB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 11.5x EVTC's $951M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALTG's -4.3%. On growth, EVTC holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.1B | $951M | $1.3B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $307M | $316M | $56M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$79M | $141M | $133M | $35M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $292M | $145M | $43M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +59.2% | +46.4% | +27.2% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +19.5% | +19.1% | +3.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +12.4% | +13.9% | +2.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +25.6% | +15.2% | +3.3% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +3.9% | +8.4% | +0.1% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +5.8% | -24.0% | +2.2% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALTG and BLKB and EVTC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 83% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BLKB offers better value at 0.22x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $265M | $1.7B | $1.4B | $790M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $858M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.20x | 15.95x | 10.62x | 22.05x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.27x | 5.97x | 17.96x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.22x | 1.18x | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.27x | 7.57x | 7.34x | 15.42x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.54x | 1.54x | 0.59x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 21.55x | 2.11x | 6.17x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.09x | 6.74x | 10.62x | 16.88x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLKB delivers a 179.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $179 in annual profit, vs $-33 for ALTG. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLKB's 13.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLKB scores 8/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.5% | +179.0% | +18.7% | +27.2% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | +6.1% | +6.1% | +9.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +17.6% | +10.2% | +19.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +15.6% | +10.5% | +20.1% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 13.16x | 1.58x | 0.56x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $360M | $824M | $68M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $759M | $306M | $2M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $70M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 3.45x | 3.10x | — | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALTG and KFRC and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, ALTG leads with a +80.5% total return vs BLKB's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIS at -2.2% vs BLKB's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.8% | -36.5% | -18.4% | +39.2% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.5% | -39.8% | -31.9% | +18.9% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | -46.1% | -31.7% | -13.8% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.1% | -43.6% | -43.3% | -16.8% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.9% | -35.0% | +89.5% | +195.5% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.8% | -18.6% | -11.9% | -4.8% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALTG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs BLKB's 50.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 0.86x | 0.76x | 0.53x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.99 | $74.88 | $38.56 | $47.48 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.16 | $33.95 | $22.83 | $24.49 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +50.5% | +60.6% | +91.0% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 37.4 | 40.6 | 65.6 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 212K | 550K | 431K | 305K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALTG as "Buy", BLKB as "Hold", EVTC as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 1.2% for ALTG (target: $8). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs EVTC's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $52.50 | $37.00 | $71.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 | 18 | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | +0.8% | +3.6% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | $0.20 | $1.55 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +12.5% | +4.8% | +6.4% | 0.0% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BLKB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ALTG vs BLKB vs EVTC vs KFRC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blackbaud, Inc. wins at 0. 10x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus BLKB's -35. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Alta Equipment Group Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning ALTG is approximately 335% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 13% for Blackbaud, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackbaud, Inc. grew EPS 142. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVTC leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alta Equipment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 1. 3% for ALTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLKB leads at 58. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), ALTG (1. 1% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BLKB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALTG or BLKB or EVTC or KFRC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, ALTG: -8. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALTG and BLKB and EVTC and KFRC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALTG (Industrials) and BLKB (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and KFRC (Industrials) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALTG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLKB is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ALTG, EVTC, KFRC, FIS pay a dividend while BLKB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.