Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $432M | $12.11B | $29.53B | $2.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $58M | $1.06B | $9.86B | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $-151M | $-327M | $1.37B | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.8% | 98.3% | 69.8% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -217.9% | -33.3% | 15.6% | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 176.7x | — | 13.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $14M | $2.61B | $6.95B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $308M | $372M | $3.01B | $434M |
AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA) | 100 | 24.2 | -75.8% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.40
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 14.27x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 14.27x
- +164.3% vs RARE's -38.0%
PRTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IONS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 241.3% 10Y total return vs AMLX's -13.6%
- 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
BIIB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 13.9% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
- Beta 0.40 vs PRTA's 1.50
- 4.7% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -132.2%
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs PRTA's -260.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs PRTA's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.3% vs RARE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIIB leads in 4 of 6 categories
IONS leads 1 • AMLX leads 1 • PRTA leads 0 • RARE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. BIIB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTA's -2.6%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $58M | $1.1B | $9.9B | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | -$124M | $4.5B | $2.4B | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | -$151M | -$327M | $1.4B | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$81M | -$971M | $2.6B | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +46.8% | +98.3% | +69.8% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.2% | -33.3% | +15.6% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% | -30.9% | +13.9% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -140.6% | -91.8% | +26.6% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.1% | +87.0% | +1.9% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +153.6% | +39.8% | +31.1% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $432M | $12.1B | $29.5B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $992M | $138M | $14.4B | $33.5B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.54x | -1.82x | -30.79x | 22.66x | -4.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 176.66x | — | 13.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 11.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 44.60x | 12.83x | 3.01x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.52x | 1.58x | 23.97x | 1.61x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.40x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs PRTA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | -49.9% | -58.6% | +7.5% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | -42.3% | -10.1% | +4.7% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | -21.0% | -12.8% | +6.5% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | -47.0% | -14.1% | +7.7% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.05x | 5.35x | 0.38x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | -$294M | $2.2B | $3.9B | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $308M | $372M | $3.0B | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $14M | $2.6B | $6.9B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -3.64x | 6.91x | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,731 for PRTA. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +164.3% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 20.7% vs PRTA's -51.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | -10.3% | -8.0% | +12.5% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +164.3% | +62.7% | +105.7% | +51.2% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.2% | -88.7% | +76.0% | -36.2% | -52.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | -82.7% | +93.9% | -50.7% | -76.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.6% | -82.0% | +241.3% | -18.1% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.2% | -51.7% | +20.7% | -13.9% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTA's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.50x | 0.42x | 0.40x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $11.80 | $86.74 | $205.97 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $4.95 | $34.78 | $121.05 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +69.9% | +84.5% | +97.1% | +57.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 35.6 | 46.2 | 57.5 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 447K | 1.6M | 1.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AMLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", PRTA as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.3% upside for PRTA (target: $19) vs 9.1% for BIIB (target: $218).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $19.00 | $107.27 | $218.16 | $48.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 28 | 32 | 48 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIIB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IONS leads in 1 (Total Returns).
AMLX vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). Biogen Inc. (BIIB) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE?
On forward P/E, Biogen Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +93. 9%, compared to -82. 7% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus PRTA's -82. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Prothena Corporation plc's 1. 50β — meaning PRTA is approximately 271% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 65. 5% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RARE leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 176. 7x for Prothena Corporation plc — 163. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTA: 130. 3% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMLX or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +241. 3% 10Y return). Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +241. 3%, PRTA: -82. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMLX and PRTA and IONS and BIIB and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.