Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AMTB logo
AMTB
BUSE logo
BUSE
FULT logo
FULT
IBCP logo
IBCP
SFNC logo
SFNC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$991M
5Y Perf.+56.9%
BUSE
First Busey Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.41B
5Y Perf.+51.4%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.41B
5Y Perf.+117.5%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$706M
5Y Perf.+131.0%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+28.0%

AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMTB logoAMTB
BUSE logoBUSE
FULT logoFULT
IBCP logoIBCP
SFNC logoSFNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$991M$2.41B$4.41B$706M$3.18B
Revenue (TTM)$521M$1.04B$1.89B$310M$618M
Net Income (TTM)$58M$135M$392M$69M$-398M
Gross Margin55.6%64.2%67.4%69.1%4.5%
Operating Margin9.7%17.9%25.7%26.2%-85.4%
Forward P/E13.1x11.4x11.3x9.7x10.6x
Total Debt$1.04B$490M$1.30B$117M$641M
Cash & Equiv.$470M$181M$271M$52M$380M

AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMTB
BUSE
FULT
IBCP
SFNC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB)100156.9+56.9%
First Busey Corpora… (BUSE)100151.4+51.4%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100217.5+117.5%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100231.0+131.0%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100128.0+28.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FULT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Amerant Bancorp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. BUSE, IBCP, and SFNC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇FULT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

AMTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.

  • Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
  • NIM 3.7% vs SFNC's 2.9%
  • +44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
BUSE
First Busey Corporation
The Banking Pick

BUSE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
Best for: growth
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.81 vs IBCP's 1.83
  • Lower P/E (11.3x vs 11.4x)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9%
Best for: valuation efficiency
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 186.7% 10Y total return vs FULT's 112.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
  • 3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FULT's 3.4%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBUSE logoBUSE57.6% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueFULT logoFULTLower P/E (11.3x vs 11.4x)
Quality / MarginsFULT logoFULTEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsSFNC logoSFNC3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FULT's 3.4%
Momentum (1Y)AMTB logoAMTB+44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5%
Efficiency (ROA)FULT logoFULTEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9%

AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMTBAmerant Bancorp Inc.
FY 2018
Corporate LATAM
100.0%$1.0B
BUSEFirst Busey Corporation
FY 2025
Asset Management
72.5%$69M
Technology Service
20.9%$20M
Other Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
6.6%$6M
FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M

AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGFULT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 6.1x IBCP's $310M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…BUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$521M$1.0B$1.9B$310M$618M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$54M$220M$529M$89M-$444M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$58M$135M$392M$69M-$398M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$111M$172M$267M$70M$410M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.6%+64.2%+67.4%+69.1%+4.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.7%+17.9%+25.7%+26.2%-85.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%+13.0%+20.7%+22.1%-64.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.4%+16.5%+14.1%+22.6%+66.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.1%+28.6%+47.2%+2.3%+42.1%
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 45% valuation discount to BUSE's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.79x vs IBCP's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…BUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Market CapShares × price$991M$2.4B$4.4B$706M$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$2.7B$5.4B$771M$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.73x19.20x11.01x10.49x-7.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.13x11.44x11.30x9.66x10.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.79x1.99x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.07x13.30x10.26x9.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.51x2.31x2.33x2.24x5.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.03x1.02x1.20x1.42x0.86x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.12x13.89x15.50x10.07x7.52x
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMTB's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…BUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+5.7%+11.6%+14.2%-11.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+0.7%+1.2%+1.3%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%+5.8%+7.5%+10.2%-9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%+2.3%+9.5%+2.6%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975684
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.11x0.20x0.37x0.23x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$571M$309M$1.0B$65M$261M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$470M$181M$271M$52M$380M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$490M$1.3B$117M$641M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.29x0.58x0.84x0.91x-1.01x
IBCP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $18,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs IBCP's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.6% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…BUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.6%+20.3%+18.6%+8.3%+18.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.5%+30.1%+38.2%+16.5%+25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.9%+52.1%+98.3%+112.6%+34.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.7%+33.8%+70.1%+85.3%-8.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.4%+74.2%+112.4%+186.7%+25.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.8%+15.0%+25.6%+28.6%+10.5%
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…BUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x0.74x0.94x0.68x0.84x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.38$29.10$23.66$39.16$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.62$21.63$16.60$29.63$17.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.8%+97.0%+96.8%+87.6%+96.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.457.058.349.352.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded226K558K1.7M139K1.1M
Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", BUSE as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs AMTB's 1.18%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…BUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$29.00$23.50$38.00$23.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts7112079
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+3.6%+3.4%+3.0%+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0151114
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.28$1.02$0.77$1.03$0.85
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%+2.9%+1.5%+1.8%0.0%
SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

5x versus First Busey Corporation at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC?

Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +85.

3%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +186. 7% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

68β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning FULT is approximately 39% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 111% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.

6% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC?

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 10. 8% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).

09

Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

68), 3. 0% yield, +186. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +186. 7%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMTB and BUSE and FULT and IBCP and SFNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.