Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Broadcasting
Consumer Electronics
Specialty Retail
ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting | Consumer Electronics | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $24M | $87.98B | $880M | $4.22T | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $17.60B | $3.86B | $451.44B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $2.72B | $-473M | $122.58B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | -30.8% | 32.3% | 78.5% | 47.9% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -79.6% | 13.7% | -0.5% | 32.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.0x | — | 33.8x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $2.32B | $5.79B | $112.38B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $5.26B | $271K | $35.93B | $86.81B |
ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anghami Inc. (ANGH) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Spotify Technology … (SPOT) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 61.5 | -38.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 222.7 | +122.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 157.2 | +57.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANGH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 88.7%, EPS growth -266.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.1%
- 88.7% revenue growth vs IHRT's 0.3%
SPOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 27.9%, current ratio 1.72x
- Lower P/E (33.0x vs 33.8x)
- Beta 0.66 vs IHRT's 1.82
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +415.5% vs SPOT's -35.0%
AAPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Beta 0.99, yield 0.4%, current ratio 0.89x
- 27.2% margin vs ANGH's -81.4%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.24 vs AAPL's 1.89
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 88.7% revenue growth vs IHRT's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.0x vs 33.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs ANGH's -81.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs SPOT's -35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 67.4% vs -0.4% |
ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
IHRT leads 1 • ANGH leads 0 • SPOT leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN and ANGH operate at a comparable scale, with $742.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANGH's -81.4%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $17.6B | $3.9B | $451.4B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $2.5B | $339M | $160.0B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $2.7B | -$473M | $122.6B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$777,324 | $3.2B | $11M | $129.2B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.8% | +32.3% | +78.5% | +47.9% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.6% | +13.7% | -0.5% | +32.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -81.4% | +15.5% | -12.2% | +27.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -60.7% | +18.1% | +0.3% | +28.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.0% | +0.8% | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +2.3% | -20.8% | +21.8% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IHRT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.6x trailing earnings, SPOT trades at a 10% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $88.0B | $880M | $4.22T | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $84.5B | $6.7B | $4.30T | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | 34.61x | -1.86x | 38.53x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.95x | — | 33.78x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.16x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 31.28x | 19.65x | 29.68x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 4.36x | 0.23x | 10.14x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 9.20x | — | 58.49x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.07x | 80.64x | 42.72x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ANGH. ANGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs ANGH's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | +35.3% | — | +146.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | +19.3% | -12.0% | +34.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +40.5% | -0.4% | +67.4% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +26.7% | -0.5% | +69.6% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.28x | — | 1.52x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$2.9B | $5.8B | $76.4B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $5.3B | $270,900 | $35.9B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $2.3B | $5.8B | $112.4B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -744.75x | 84.99x | -0.17x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SPOT and IHRT and AAPL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $368 for ANGH. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs SPOT's -35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOT at 43.5% vs ANGH's -31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | -25.7% | +36.6% | +6.2% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | -35.0% | +415.5% | +47.0% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | +195.7% | +85.9% | +67.4% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +78.5% | -75.0% | +124.4% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +186.8% | -68.5% | +1174.1% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.4% | +43.5% | +23.0% | +18.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPOT and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs ANGH's 51.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.66x | 1.82x | 0.99x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.05 | $785.00 | $6.56 | $292.13 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $405.00 | $1.08 | $193.25 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.8% | +54.4% | +86.4% | +98.4% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 32.1 | 68.6 | 69.4 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.0M | 986K | 39.8M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPOT as "Buy", IHRT as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.5% upside for SPOT (target: $631) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, AAPL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.36% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $630.64 | $3.50 | $317.11 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 | 10 | 110 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 14 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | $1.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +2.1% | 0.0% |
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IHRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ANGH vs SPOT vs IHRT vs AAPL vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Anghami Inc.
(ANGH) is the stronger pick with 88. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) offers the better valuation at 34. 6x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the cheapest at 34. 6x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Spotify Technology S. A. is actually cheaper at 33. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -96. 3% for Anghami Inc. (ANGH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus ANGH's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 176% more volatile than SPOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anghami Inc. (ANGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anghami Inc.
(ANGH) is pulling ahead at 88. 7% versus 0. 3% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spotify Technology S. A. grew EPS 91. 1% year-over-year, compared to -266. 7% for Anghami Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANGH leads at 30. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -81. 4% for Anghami Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus -79. 6% for ANGH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) trades at 33. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOT: 47. 5% to $630. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.
4% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ANGH, SPOT, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANGH or SPOT or IHRT or AAPL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1174% 10Y return). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1174%, IHRT: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANGH and SPOT and IHRT and AAPL and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANGH (Communication Services) and SPOT (Communication Services) and IHRT (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANGH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.