Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ANNX
Annexon, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$604M
5Y Perf.-73.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.-36.5%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-51.4%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.23B
5Y Perf.-7.9%

ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ANNX logoANNX
PRAX logoPRAX
ACAD logoACAD
BEAM logoBEAM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$604M$9.63B$3.86B$3.23B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$-92K$1.10B$132M
Net Income (TTM)$-207M$-327M$376M$-65M
Gross Margin91.5%-64.2%
Operating Margin7.4%-281.0%
Forward P/E50.9x
Total Debt$29M$110K$52M$294M
Cash & Equiv.$49M$357M$178M$295M

ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ANNX
PRAX
ACAD
BEAM
StockOct 20May 26Return
Annexon, Inc. (ANNX)10026.5-73.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10063.5-36.5%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10048.6-51.4%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)10092.1-7.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. BEAM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ANNX
Annexon, Inc.
The Secondary Option

ANNX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • +7.7% vs ACAD's +52.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Income Pick

ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 1.26
  • 34.3% margin vs BEAM's -49.2%
  • Beta 1.26 vs ANNX's 2.25, lower leverage
  • 26.2% ROA vs ANNX's -72.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -70.2%
Best for: income & stability
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Play

BEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
  • 67.8% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
  • Beta 2.14, current ratio 13.09x
  • 120.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBEAM logoBEAM120.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs BEAM's -49.2%
Stability / SafetyACAD logoACADBeta 1.26 vs ANNX's 2.25, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs ACAD's +52.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs ANNX's -72.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -70.2%

ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ANNXAnnexon, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
BEAMBeam Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGANNX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEAM's -49.2%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricANNX logoANNXAnnexon, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0-$92,000$1.1B$132M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$216M-$357M$96M-$355M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$207M-$327M$376M-$65M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$177M-$283M$212M-$384M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.5%-64.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%-2.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+34.3%-49.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.4%-2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-48.0%+2.7%-81.8%+26.6%
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricANNX logoANNXAnnexon, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$604M$9.6B$3.9B$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$583M$9.3B$3.7B$3.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.47x-24.72x9.85x-38.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.50.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.61x23.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.59x8.54x3.15x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.74x
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-92 for ANNX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEAM's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricANNX logoANNXAnnexon, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-92.3%-43.0%+35.6%-5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-72.2%-40.2%+26.2%-4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-70.2%-65.0%+10.0%-31.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-51.4%-49.3%+10.1%-33.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93364
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.00x0.04x0.24x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$21M-$357M-$126M-$1M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$49M$357M$178M$295M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$29M$110,000$52M$294M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.08x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,770 for ANNX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs ACAD's +52.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs BEAM's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricANNX logoANNXAnnexon, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.7%+16.4%-13.7%+16.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+226.6%+775.0%+52.4%+93.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.1%+1976.5%+4.7%-5.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.3%-20.8%+7.1%-55.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.9%-20.1%-22.9%+67.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.7%+174.9%+1.5%-1.9%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANNX's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ANNX's 76.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricANNX logoANNXAnnexon, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.25x1.55x1.26x2.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.18$356.00$27.81$36.44
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.60$35.18$14.45$15.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.9%+93.6%+81.1%+86.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.855.644.260.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M378K1.8M2.0M
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ANNX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 189.9% upside for ANNX (target: $16) vs 29.7% for BEAM (target: $41).

MetricANNX logoANNXAnnexon, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.00$544.40$34.78$40.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts10163727
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BEAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ANNX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM?

Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -72. 3% for Annexon, Inc. (ANNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEAM returned +67. 8% versus ANNX's -68. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Annexon, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning ANNX is approximately 79% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 24% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -57. 2% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -274. 6% for BEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANNX: 189.

9% to $16. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is ANNX or PRAX or ACAD or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -22. 9%, ANNX: -68. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ANNX and PRAX and ACAD and BEAM?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ANNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ANNX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BEAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.