REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AOMR vs SACH vs GPMT vs TPVG vs BXMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
Asset Management
REIT - Mortgage
AOMR vs SACH vs GPMT vs TPVG vs BXMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $220M | $53M | $70M | $234M | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $38M | $132M | $97M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $6M | $-40M | $-12M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 67.7% | 98.1% | 47.3% | 83.5% | 62.6% |
| Operating Margin | 43.7% | 42.0% | -4.3% | 77.9% | 58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 28.1x | — | 6.2x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $308M | $278M | $1.17B | $469M | $16.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $11M | $66M | $20M | $453M |
AOMR vs SACH vs GPMT vs TPVG vs BXMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angel Oak Mortgage,… (AOMR) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 10.0 | -90.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 38.0 | -62.0% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AOMR vs SACH vs GPMT vs TPVG vs BXMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AOMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.06 vs TPVG's 6.14
- Better valuation composite
SACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.40, yield 18.4%, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.40 vs GPMT's 1.42, lower leverage
GPMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 91.2% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 50.4%
- 50.6% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
Among these 5 stocks, BXMT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs GPMT's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs GPMT's 1.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, vs BXMT's 9.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs GPMT's -23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.6% |
AOMR vs SACH vs GPMT vs TPVG vs BXMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPMT leads in 1 of 6 categories
AOMR leads 1 • SACH leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GPMT and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 40.6x SACH's $38M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $38M | $132M | $97M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $17M | -$8M | -$22M | $948M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $6M | -$40M | -$12M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$136M | $3M | $463,000 | -$59M | $335M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.7% | +98.1% | +47.3% | +83.5% | +62.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +42.0% | -4.3% | +77.9% | +58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +16.7% | -30.5% | +50.6% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -131.8% | +6.6% | +0.4% | -58.7% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.0% | +145.2% | +157.8% | — | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -134.5% | -79.9% | +40.9% | -2.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 84% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AOMR offers better value at 0.04x vs TPVG's 4.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $220M | $53M | $70M | $234M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $486M | $320M | $1.2B | $683M | $18.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.90x | 28.06x | -1.27x | 4.73x | 29.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.23x | — | — | 6.23x | 12.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.04x | — | — | 4.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.30x | 11.33x | 20.68x | 9.02x | 16.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 1.12x | 0.48x | 2.41x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 0.29x | 0.13x | 0.66x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.82x | 21.11x | 26.41x | — | 11.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AOMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AOMR delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. AOMR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AOMR scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +3.6% | -7.1% | -3.4% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.3% | -2.3% | -1.5% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +4.8% | +2.6% | +7.2% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +6.2% | +4.6% | +9.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.15x | 1.59x | 2.12x | 1.33x | 4.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $266M | $267M | $1.1B | $449M | $15.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $11M | $66M | $20M | $453M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $308M | $278M | $1.2B | $469M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.43x | 1.25x | 0.58x | -1.02x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AOMR and SACH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BXMT five years ago would be worth $9,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,518 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +35.6% total return vs GPMT's -23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AOMR at 17.1% vs SACH's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +10.6% | -35.9% | -9.6% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.7% | +35.6% | -23.4% | +7.4% | +10.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.5% | -42.4% | -36.3% | -5.6% | +48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | -43.6% | -64.8% | -15.2% | -2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | -5.2% | -50.4% | +91.2% | +50.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.1% | -16.8% | -13.9% | -1.9% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SACH and BXMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SACH is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.40x | 1.42x | 0.77x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.34 | $1.35 | $3.12 | $7.53 | $20.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.96 | $0.80 | $1.24 | $4.48 | $17.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +81.5% | +47.1% | +76.6% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 64.9 | 54.4 | 67.6 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 158K | 152K | 501K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AOMR as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", BXMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.1% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 10.5% for AOMR (target: $10). For income investors, SACH offers the higher dividend yield at 18.42% vs BXMT's 9.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.75 | — | $2.50 | $8.95 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 12 | 12 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.4% | +18.4% | +14.7% | +17.8% | +9.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $0.20 | $0.22 | $1.02 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.0% | 0.0% | +3.4% |
GPMT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AOMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
AOMR vs SACH vs GPMT vs TPVG vs BXMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is the stronger pick with 187. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) delivered a total return of -2. 3%, compared to -64. 8% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus GPMT's -50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
(SACH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning GPMT is approximately 252% more volatile than SACH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 115% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is pulling ahead at 187. 8% versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to 48. 8% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AOMR leads at 110. 8% versus 43. 6% for GPMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 70. 1% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 9. 9% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).
09Is AOMR or SACH or GPMT or TPVG or BXMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
(SACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SACH: -5. 2%, GPMT: -50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AOMR and SACH and GPMT and TPVG and BXMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (AOMR (Real Estate) and SACH (Real Estate) and GPMT (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and BXMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AOMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.