Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ARKO
Arko Corp.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$753M
5Y Perf.-32.6%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.75B
5Y Perf.+400.6%
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.59B
5Y Perf.+432.7%
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.71B
5Y Perf.+124.2%

ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ARKO logoARKO
MUSA logoMUSA
CASY logoCASY
DINO logoDINO
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$753M$10.75B$31.59B$12.71B
Revenue (TTM)$7.59B$19.68B$16.98B$27.62B
Net Income (TTM)$27M$554M$650M$1.23B
Gross Margin11.1%5.5%23.9%7.3%
Operating Margin1.7%4.3%6.3%6.1%
Forward P/E25.8x19.8x47.1x12.5x
Total Debt$3.95B$3.25B$2.96B$3.23B
Cash & Equiv.$305M$29M$327M$978M

ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ARKO
MUSA
CASY
DINO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Arko Corp. (ARKO)10067.4-32.6%
Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)100500.6+400.6%
Casey's General Sto… (CASY)100532.7+432.7%
HF Sinclair Corpora… (DINO)100224.2+124.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DINO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Murphy USA Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CASY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ARKO
Arko Corp.
The Secondary Option

ARKO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MUSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • 8.0% 10Y total return vs CASY's 6.4%
  • PEG 1.53 vs CASY's 3.02
  • Lower P/E (19.8x vs 47.1x), PEG 1.53 vs 3.02
  • 11.7% ROA vs ARKO's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
The Growth Play

CASY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • 7.3% revenue growth vs ARKO's -12.5%
  • Beta 0.29 vs ARKO's 1.14, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
The Income Pick

DINO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 34.9%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.31, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.94x
  • 4.5% margin vs ARKO's 0.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCASY logoCASY7.3% revenue growth vs ARKO's -12.5%
ValueMUSA logoMUSALower P/E (19.8x vs 47.1x), PEG 1.53 vs 3.02
Quality / MarginsDINO logoDINO4.5% margin vs ARKO's 0.4%
Stability / SafetyCASY logoCASYBeta 0.29 vs ARKO's 1.14, lower leverage
DividendsDINO logoDINO2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2%
Momentum (1Y)DINO logoDINO+121.7% vs MUSA's +15.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MUSA logoMUSA11.7% ROA vs ARKO's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3%

ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARKOArko Corp.
FY 2025
Fuel Products
79.0%$6.0B
Merchandise Products
19.4%$1.5B
Other Product
1.6%$122M
MUSAMurphy USA Inc.
FY 2025
Product
76.7%$14.9B
Merchandise
22.2%$4.3B
Product and Service, Other
1.1%$217M
CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.
FY 2020
Gasoline
60.5%$5.5B
Grocery And Other Merchandise
27.4%$2.5B
Prepared Food And Fountain
12.0%$1.1B
DINOHF Sinclair Corporation
FY 2025
Refined Product
49.2%$24.7B
Transportation Fuels
41.8%$20.9B
Lubricants and Specialty Products
4.6%$2.3B
Crude Oil
2.7%$1.3B
Product and Service, Other
1.5%$746M
Transportation And Logistic Services
0.2%$121M

ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDINOLAGGINGARKO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

DINO is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.6B annually — 3.6x ARKO's $7.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.5% (DINO) to 0.4% (ARKO). On growth, DINO holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricARKO logoARKOArko Corp.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…DINO logoDINOHF Sinclair Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7.6B$19.7B$17.0B$27.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$264M$1.1B$1.5B$2.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$27M$554M$650M$1.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$19M$555M$667M$1.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.1%+5.5%+23.9%+7.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.7%+4.3%+6.3%+6.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.4%+2.8%+3.8%+4.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.3%+2.8%+3.9%+4.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.1%+6.5%+0.3%+11.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.7%+176.8%+49.8%+135.3%
DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 22.7x trailing earnings, DINO trades at a 61% valuation discount to CASY's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MUSA offers better value at 1.85x vs CASY's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricARKO logoARKOArko Corp.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…DINO logoDINOHF Sinclair Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$753M$10.8B$31.6B$12.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$14.0B$34.2B$15.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS44.73x24.12x58.13x22.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.81x19.84x47.05x12.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.77x1.85x3.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.58x13.71x28.51x8.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x0.55x1.98x0.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.10x18.20x9.06x1.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.54x28.73x54.03x14.68x
DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MUSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MUSA delivers a 89.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $7 for ARKO. DINO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKO's 10.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARKO scores 6/9 vs MUSA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricARKO logoARKOArko Corp.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…DINO logoDINOHF Sinclair Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+89.5%+23.7%+13.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.8%+11.7%+10.0%+7.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+15.8%+11.3%+6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.3%+20.0%+12.5%+6.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage10.76x5.22x0.84x0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.6B$3.2B$2.6B$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$305M$29M$327M$978M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.0B$3.3B$3.0B$3.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.56x7.47x13.45x7.13x
MUSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CASY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $41,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,933 for ARKO. Over the past 12 months, DINO leads with a +121.7% total return vs MUSA's +15.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.0% vs ARKO's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricARKO logoARKOArko Corp.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…DINO logoDINOHF Sinclair Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+50.8%+43.5%+53.2%+51.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+66.2%+15.3%+83.1%+121.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-12.5%+106.0%+272.4%+95.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.7%+318.2%+285.1%+118.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.4%+803.3%+638.3%+202.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.4%+27.2%+55.0%+25.1%
CASY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MUSA and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MUSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARKO's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs DINO's 94.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricARKO logoARKOArko Corp.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…DINO logoDINOHF Sinclair Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x-0.23x0.29x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.08$609.82$867.40$74.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.71$345.23$430.00$32.39
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.8%+95.3%+98.1%+94.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.264.076.868.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded919K354K545K2.7M
Evenly matched — MUSA and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CASY and DINO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ARKO as "Hold", MUSA as "Hold", CASY as "Buy", DINO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.0% upside for ARKO (target: $8) vs -19.1% for CASY (target: $688). For income investors, DINO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.86% vs CASY's 0.23%.

MetricARKO logoARKOArko Corp.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…DINO logoDINOHF Sinclair Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.58$504.25$688.10$61.57
# AnalystsCovering analysts4112516
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%+0.4%+0.2%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05194
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12$2.13$1.94$2.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.7%+6.0%+0.0%+2.8%
Evenly matched — CASY and DINO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DINO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MUSA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallHF Sinclair Corporation (DINO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ARKO vs MUSA vs CASY vs DINO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Casey's General Stores, Inc.

(CASY) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO?

On trailing P/E, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) is the cheapest at 22.

7x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, HF Sinclair Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Murphy USA Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. 's 3. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO?

Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) delivered a total return of +318. 2%, compared to -30. 7% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +803. 3% versus ARKO's -27. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 23β versus Arko Corp. 's 1. 14β — meaning ARKO is approximately -590% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 11% for Arko Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casey's General Stores, Inc.

(CASY) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HF Sinclair Corporation grew EPS 241. 8% year-over-year, compared to -0. 0% for Murphy USA Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CASY leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO?

Casey's General Stores, Inc.

(CASY) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 0. 3% for Arko Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CASY leads at 5. 0% versus 1. 3% for ARKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASY leads at 23. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. 's 3. 02x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 47. 1x for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — 34. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARKO: 13. 0% to $7. 58.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 2% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).

09

Is ARKO or MUSA or CASY or DINO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 23), +803. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +803. 3%, ARKO: -27. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ARKO and MUSA and CASY and DINO?

These companies operate in different sectors (ARKO (Consumer Cyclical) and MUSA (Consumer Cyclical) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical) and DINO (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

ARKO, DINO pay a dividend while MUSA, CASY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ARKO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUSA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CASY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DINO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ARKO and MUSA and CASY and DINO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ARKO: -3.1% · MUSA: 6.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ARKO: 44.7x · MUSA: 24.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.