Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
Specialty Retail
REIT - Mortgage
Specialty Retail
ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | REIT - Residential | Specialty Retail | REIT - Mortgage | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $753M | $103M | $10.75B | $74M | $31.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.59B | $26M | $19.68B | $132M | $16.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $12M | $554M | $-40M | $650M |
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 79.9% | 5.5% | 47.3% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 53.4% | 4.3% | -4.3% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 25.8x | 6.6x | 19.8x | — | 47.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.95B | $122M | $3.25B | $1.17B | $2.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $6M | $29M | $66M | $327M |
ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arko Corp. (ARKO) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.8% |
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 100 | 115.1 | +15.1% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Casey's General Sto… (CASY) | 100 | 219.4 | +119.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARKO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.14, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.66x
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 15.3%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 47.1x)
- 46.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
- 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2%
MUSA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs CASY's 6.4%
- PEG 1.53 vs CASY's 3.02
- 11.7% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.6%
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs ARKO's -12.5%
CASY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 84.3%, current ratio 0.92x
- Beta 0.29 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage
- +83.1% vs GPMT's -19.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs ARKO's -12.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 47.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.1% vs GPMT's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.6% |
ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUNS leads in 1 of 6 categories
MUSA leads 1 • CASY leads 1 • ARKO leads 0 • GPMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MUSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.7B annually — 746.1x SUNS's $26M. SUNS is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.6B | $26M | $19.7B | $132M | $17.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $264M | $16M | $1.1B | -$8M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $12M | $554M | -$40M | $650M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$3M | $555M | $463,000 | $667M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +79.9% | +5.5% | +47.3% | +23.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +53.4% | +4.3% | -4.3% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +46.0% | +2.8% | -30.5% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -13.0% | +2.8% | +0.4% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +108.1% | +6.5% | +157.8% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | -55.6% | +176.8% | +40.9% | +49.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARKO and SUNS and GPMT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SUNS trades at a 86% valuation discount to CASY's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MUSA offers better value at 1.85x vs CASY's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $753M | $103M | $10.8B | $74M | $31.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $219M | $14.0B | $1.2B | $34.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.73x | 8.12x | 24.12x | -1.34x | 58.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.81x | 6.58x | 19.84x | — | 47.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.77x | — | 1.85x | — | 3.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.58x | 12.93x | 13.71x | 20.75x | 28.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 3.92x | 0.55x | 0.51x | 1.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.10x | 0.54x | 18.20x | 0.13x | 9.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.54x | — | 28.73x | 27.85x | 54.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MUSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MUSA delivers a 89.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. SUNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKO's 10.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARKO scores 6/9 vs SUNS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +6.6% | +89.5% | -7.1% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +4.6% | +11.7% | -2.3% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +6.0% | +15.8% | +2.6% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +5.4% | +20.0% | +4.6% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.76x | 0.67x | 5.22x | 2.12x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $116M | $3.2B | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $6M | $29M | $66M | $327M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $122M | $3.3B | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 3.53x | 7.47x | 0.58x | 13.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $41,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, CASY leads with a +83.1% total return vs GPMT's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.0% vs GPMT's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.8% | -13.4% | +43.5% | -32.5% | +53.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.2% | -12.3% | +15.3% | -19.7% | +83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.5% | -10.5% | +106.0% | -34.3% | +272.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.7% | -10.5% | +318.2% | -65.3% | +285.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | -10.5% | +803.3% | -50.0% | +638.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.4% | -3.6% | +27.2% | -13.1% | +55.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MUSA and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MUSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.86x | -0.23x | 1.44x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.08 | $11.78 | $609.82 | $3.12 | $867.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $7.39 | $345.23 | $1.24 | $430.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +65.4% | +95.3% | +49.7% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 47.0 | 64.0 | 49.4 | 76.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 919K | 105K | 354K | 154K | 545K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SUNS and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARKO as "Hold", SUNS as "Hold", MUSA as "Hold", GPMT as "Hold", CASY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.8% upside for SUNS (target: $15) vs -19.1% for CASY (target: $688). For income investors, SUNS offers the higher dividend yield at 15.25% vs CASY's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.58 | $15.25 | $504.25 | $2.50 | $688.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +15.3% | +0.4% | +14.0% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.18 | $2.13 | $0.22 | $1.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | 0.0% | +6.0% | +7.6% | +0.0% |
SUNS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MUSA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ARKO vs SUNS vs MUSA vs GPMT vs CASY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is the stronger pick with 187. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY?
On trailing P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Murphy USA Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. 's 3. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY?
Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) delivered a total return of +318. 2%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +803. 3% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 23β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately -721% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 11% for Arko Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is pulling ahead at 187. 8% versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. grew EPS 73. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the more profitable company, earning 46. 0% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 46. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUNS leads at 64. 2% versus 1. 3% for ARKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. 's 3. 02x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 47. 1x for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUNS: 97. 8% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the highest yield at 15. 3%, versus 0. 2% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).
09Is ARKO or SUNS or MUSA or GPMT or CASY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 23), +803. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +803. 3%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARKO and SUNS and MUSA and GPMT and CASY?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARKO (Consumer Cyclical) and SUNS (Real Estate) and MUSA (Consumer Cyclical) and GPMT (Real Estate) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARKO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MUSA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CASY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ARKO, SUNS, GPMT pay a dividend while MUSA, CASY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.