Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $11.84B | $2.64B | $5.29B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.79B | $1.12B | $1.45B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $317M | $224M | $458M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 7.0% | 71.0% | 65.6% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 25.5% | 36.0% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 11.5x | 10.8x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.72B | $1.12B | $1.20B | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $639M | $668M | $910M | $380M |
ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aramark (ARMK) | 100 | 241.1 | +141.1% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARMK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.99x
- Beta 0.71, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.99x
- Beta 0.71 vs SFNC's 1.02
- 2.4% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 7.3% vs -9.1%
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
- PEG 1.42 vs HOMB's 3.55
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
- 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 7.3% vs -9.1% |
ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
ARMK leads 1 • TRMK leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 30.0x SFNC's $627M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.8B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $323M | $601M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $317M | $224M | $458M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $257M | $230M | $354M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +71.0% | +65.6% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +25.5% | +36.0% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +20.0% | +27.7% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +20.7% | +29.1% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | +5.4% | +26.0% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 67% valuation discount to ARMK's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $2.6B | $5.3B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.9B | $3.1B | $5.6B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.93x | 12.13x | 13.36x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.26x | 11.50x | 10.82x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 4.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.35x | 9.49x | 10.12x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 2.36x | 3.64x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.81x | 1.28x | 1.36x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.06x | 11.39x | 12.53x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARMK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARMK's 1.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARMK scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +10.8% | +10.9% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +1.2% | +2.0% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +7.1% | +7.2% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +3.2% | +9.8% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.81x | 0.53x | 0.30x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | $448M | $292M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $639M | $668M | $910M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.20x | 0.75x | 1.44x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARMK five years ago would be worth $17,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | +15.5% | -3.0% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.0% | +32.5% | -1.9% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.4% | +118.5% | +42.0% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.5% | +47.6% | +6.6% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +127.7% | +58.2% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.3% | +29.8% | +12.4% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARMK and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.94x | 0.82x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.88 | $45.99 | $30.83 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.07 | $33.39 | $25.68 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +97.6% | +87.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 56.0 | 50.3 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 392K | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARMK as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs ARMK's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.20 | $45.50 | $32.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 9 | 19 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 21 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | $0.97 | $0.75 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +3.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ARMK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aramark (ARMK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Aramark at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Aramark (ARMK) delivered a total return of +70.
5%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aramark (ARMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 45% more volatile than ARMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 181% for Aramark — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aramark grew EPS 23. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Aramark — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Aramark (ARMK).
09Is ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aramark (ARMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMK: +97. 1%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARMK and TRMK and HOMB and SFNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARMK (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.