Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ARMK
Aramark

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.84B
5Y Perf.+141.1%
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.64B
5Y Perf.+88.7%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.29B
5Y Perf.+85.6%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+24.5%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.+145.7%

ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ARMK logoARMK
TRMK logoTRMK
HOMB logoHOMB
SFNC logoSFNC
IBCP logoIBCP
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$11.84B$2.64B$5.29B$3.09B$699M
Revenue (TTM)$18.79B$1.12B$1.45B$627M$315M
Net Income (TTM)$317M$224M$458M$-398M$69M
Gross Margin7.0%71.0%65.6%5.8%69.6%
Operating Margin4.2%25.5%36.0%-84.2%25.8%
Forward P/E20.3x11.5x10.8x10.3x9.6x
Total Debt$5.72B$1.12B$1.20B$641M$117M
Cash & Equiv.$639M$668M$910M$380M$52M

ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ARMK
TRMK
HOMB
SFNC
IBCP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Aramark (ARMK)100241.1+141.1%
Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK)100188.7+88.7%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100185.6+85.6%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100124.5+24.5%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100245.7+145.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TRMK leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Aramark is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. HOMB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ARMK
Aramark
The Defensive Pick

ARMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.99x
  • Beta 0.71 vs SFNC's 1.02
  • 2.4% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 7.3% vs -9.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
The Banking Pick

TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.42 vs HOMB's 3.55
  • 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
  • PEG 1.42 vs 3.55
  • +32.5% vs HOMB's -1.9%
Best for: valuation efficiency
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
  • Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
  • NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
  • 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Financial Play

SFNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 184.6% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
  • Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRMK logoTRMK34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueTRMK logoTRMKPEG 1.42 vs 3.55
Quality / MarginsHOMB logoHOMB27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
Stability / SafetyARMK logoARMKBeta 0.71 vs SFNC's 1.02
DividendsHOMB logoHOMB2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)TRMK logoTRMK+32.5% vs HOMB's -1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ARMK logoARMK2.4% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 7.3% vs -9.1%

ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARMKAramark
FY 2024
Food and Support Services - United States
72.3%$12.6B
Food and Support Services - International
27.7%$4.8B
TRMKTrustmark Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
52.3%$43M
Deposit Account
47.7%$39M
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M

ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGHOMB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 59.6x IBCP's $315M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.

MetricARMK logoARMKAramarkTRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$18.8B$1.1B$1.5B$627M$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.3B$323M$601M-$497M$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$317M$224M$458M-$398M$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$257M$230M$354M$755M$70M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+7.0%+71.0%+65.6%+5.8%+69.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.2%+25.5%+36.0%-84.2%+25.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.7%+20.0%+27.7%-63.4%+21.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.4%+20.7%+29.1%+71.7%+22.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.7%+5.4%+26.0%+42.1%+2.3%
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 72% valuation discount to ARMK's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricARMK logoARMKAramarkTRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Market CapShares × price$11.8B$2.6B$5.3B$3.1B$699M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.9B$3.1B$5.6B$3.4B$764M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.93x12.13x13.36x-7.24x10.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.26x11.50x10.82x10.35x9.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.50x4.39x1.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.35x9.49x10.12x9.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x2.36x3.64x4.93x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.81x1.28x1.36x0.84x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.06x11.39x12.53x6.88x9.96x
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARMK's 1.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricARMK logoARMKAramarkTRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+10.8%+10.9%-11.6%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.4%+1.2%+2.0%-1.6%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.3%+7.1%+7.2%-9.1%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.7%+3.2%+9.8%-4.2%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977748
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.81x0.53x0.30x0.19x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.1B$448M$292M$261M$65M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$639M$668M$910M$380M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.7B$1.1B$1.2B$641M$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.20x0.75x1.44x-1.01x0.91x
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARMK five years ago would be worth $17,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricARMK logoARMKAramarkTRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.5%+15.5%-3.0%+14.6%+7.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.0%+32.5%-1.9%+16.7%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+87.4%+118.5%+42.0%+53.4%+130.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.5%+47.6%+6.6%-15.4%+63.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+97.1%+127.7%+58.2%+25.2%+184.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.3%+29.8%+12.4%+15.3%+32.1%
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ARMK and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ARMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricARMK logoARMKAramarkTRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.94x0.82x1.02x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.88$45.99$30.83$22.18$37.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.07$33.39$25.68$17.00$29.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.1%+97.6%+87.1%+96.3%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.056.050.362.350.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M392K1.4M1.2M176K
Evenly matched — ARMK and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ARMK as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs ARMK's 0.92%.

MetricARMK logoARMKAramarkTRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$47.20$45.50$32.00$22.67$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2491997
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+2.2%+2.8%+4.0%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1121611
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.41$0.97$0.75$0.85$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%+3.0%+1.6%0.0%+1.8%
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ARMK vs TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aramark (ARMK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

4x versus Aramark at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

Over the past 5 years, Aramark (ARMK) delivered a total return of +70.

5%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aramark (ARMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

71β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 45% more volatile than ARMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 181% for Aramark — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aramark grew EPS 23. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Aramark — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Aramark (ARMK).

09

Is ARMK or TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aramark (ARMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

71), 0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMK: +97. 1%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ARMK and TRMK and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP?

These companies operate in different sectors (ARMK (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ARMK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRMK

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ARMK and TRMK and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ARMK: 6.1% · TRMK: 34.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ARMK: 36.9x · TRMK: 12.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.