Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $4.72B | $11.87B | $10.13B | $25.63B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.46B | $4.99B | $4.23B | $12.48B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475M | $982M | $824M | $2.21B | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 67.3% | 62.2% | 61.7% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 25.7% | 26.4% | 21.5% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 11.4x | 11.6x | 11.1x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.17B | $4.57B | $4.48B | $18.48B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $575M | $961M | $468M | $1.78B | $599M |
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) | 100 | 203.2 | +103.2% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
| Wintrust Financial … (WTFC) | 100 | 356.9 | +256.9% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.8%, EPS growth 284.7%
- 16.8% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0%
- 3.3% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FHN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 19.7% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- +34.9% vs FIS's -35.3%
- 1.2% ROA vs HBAN's 1.0%, ROIC 7.0% vs 5.1%
WTFC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 224.8% 10Y total return vs FHN's 119.6%
- NIM 3.1% vs ASB's 2.7%
Among these 5 stocks, HBAN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs ASB's 1.17
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.8% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.1x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.74 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs ASB's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.9% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs HBAN's 1.0%, ROIC 7.0% vs 5.1% |
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FHN leads in 1 of 6 categories
ASB leads 1 • FIS leads 1 • WTFC leads 1 • HBAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 5.1x ASB's $2.5B. FHN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $5.0B | $4.2B | $12.5B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $653M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $3.1B | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475M | $982M | $824M | $2.2B | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $579M | $628M | $915M | $2.3B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +67.3% | +62.2% | +61.7% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +25.7% | +26.4% | +21.5% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +19.7% | +19.5% | +17.7% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +12.6% | +21.5% | +18.2% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.9% | +79.3% | +25.5% | -11.8% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ASB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, ASB trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTFC offers better value at 0.66x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $11.9B | $10.1B | $25.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $15.5B | $14.1B | $42.3B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.28x | 13.02x | 13.08x | 11.65x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.69x | 11.41x | 11.62x | 11.10x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.24x | — | 0.66x | 0.77x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.40x | 11.58x | 11.71x | 15.75x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 2.38x | 2.39x | 2.05x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.33x | 1.41x | 1.00x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.08x | 18.90x | 11.12x | 11.25x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTFC delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASB's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +10.7% | +11.3% | +10.0% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +7.0% | +7.5% | +5.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +10.2% | +6.4% | +4.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.50x | 0.62x | 0.76x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $3.6B | $4.0B | $16.7B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $575M | $961M | $468M | $1.8B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $4.6B | $4.5B | $18.5B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 0.82x | 0.74x | 0.62x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTFC five years ago would be worth $20,287 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FHN leads with a +34.9% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTFC at 35.3% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +2.1% | +6.4% | -6.5% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.9% | +34.9% | +34.0% | +12.4% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.2% | +145.7% | +147.6% | +85.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.7% | +43.6% | +102.9% | +22.0% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | +119.6% | +224.8% | +121.5% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +34.9% | +35.3% | +22.8% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASB's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASB currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.10x | 1.16x | 1.09x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.52 | $26.56 | $162.96 | $19.46 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.40 | $18.58 | $113.75 | $14.87 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +92.1% | +92.8% | +83.2% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 62.0 | 63.5 | 53.4 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 5.0M | 438K | 24.3M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASB and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASB as "Hold", FHN as "Hold", WTFC as "Buy", HBAN as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 4.5% for ASB (target: $30). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs FHN's 2.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.75 | $28.00 | $174.57 | $20.38 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 35 | 22 | 48 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +2.6% | — | +3.7% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.93 | $0.63 | — | $0.60 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +7.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FHN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ASB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ASB vs FHN vs WTFC vs HBAN vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is the stronger pick with 16.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Associated Banc-Corp's 1. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) delivered a total return of +102.
9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTFC returned +224. 8% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Associated Banc-Corp's 1. 26β — meaning ASB is approximately 66% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 84% for Associated Banc-Corp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is pulling ahead at 16.
8% versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Associated Banc-Corp grew EPS 284. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS?
First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTFC leads at 26. 4% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Associated Banc-Corp's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Wintrust Financial Corporation — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS?
In this comparison, HBAN (3.
7% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), ASB (3. 3% yield), FHN (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. WTFC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASB or FHN or WTFC or HBAN or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, WTFC: +224. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASB and FHN and WTFC and HBAN and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASB (Financial Services) and FHN (Financial Services) and WTFC (Financial Services) and HBAN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WTFC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ASB, FHN, HBAN, FIS pay a dividend while WTFC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.