Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Capital Markets
Investment - Banking & Investment Services
ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Capital Markets | Investment - Banking & Investment Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $192M | $4.62B | $9.51B | $37.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $93M | $4.36B | $132.38B | $10.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-5M | $507M | $462M | $984M |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 75.5% | 91.4% | 2.0% | 89.8% |
| Operating Margin | -42.1% | 6.4% | 34.6% | 1.6% | 86.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.9x | 7.2x | 21.0x | 33.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.00B | $88M | $23.06B | $18.52B | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.53B | $177M | $302M | $1.61B | $4.96B |
ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AtlasClear Holdings… (ATCH) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Open Lending Corpor… (LPRO) | 100 | 4.6 | -95.4% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) | 100 | 624.2 | +524.2% |
| Interactive Brokers… (IBKR) | 100 | 458.4 | +358.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATCH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 12.1% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
- 2.3% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0%
LPRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 288.0%, EPS growth 96.8%
- 288.0% NII/revenue growth vs IBKR's 9.8%
PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 21.0x)
- Beta 0.93 vs ATCH's 2.58
SNEX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 2.9%
- 14.5% 10Y total return vs IBKR's 8.2%
- Beta 1.08, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.57x
- 2.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IBKR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
IBKR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.93, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 1.13x
- PEG 1.13 vs SNEX's 2.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 288.0% NII/revenue growth vs IBKR's 9.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 21.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs LPRO's -4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs ATCH's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IBKR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.6% vs PFSI's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0% |
ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNEX leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBKR leads 1 • ATCH leads 0 • LPRO leads 0 • PFSI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ATCH and IBKR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $132.4B annually — 9058.6x ATCH's $15M. ATCH is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPRO's -4.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $93M | $4.4B | $132.4B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$5M | $1.0B | $47.1B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$5M | $507M | $462M | $984M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$425,000 | -$3.8B | $6.5B | $15.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +75.5% | +91.4% | +2.0% | +89.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | +6.4% | +34.6% | +1.6% | +86.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | -4.5% | +11.5% | +0.2% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | -3.5% | -32.4% | +3.3% | +153.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.1% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | — | +7.7% | +46.8% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PFSI and IBKR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 75% valuation discount to IBKR's 37.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBKR offers better value at 1.27x vs SNEX's 2.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $192M | $4.6B | $9.5B | $37.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$6.5B | $103M | $27.4B | $26.4B | $32.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.70x | -45.38x | 9.53x | 20.53x | 37.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.92x | 7.17x | 20.99x | 33.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.28x | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.25x | 18.11x | 12.28x | 3.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 2.05x | 1.06x | 0.07x | 3.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.56x | 1.11x | 2.55x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.02x | — | — | 2.20x | 2.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNEX delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for LPRO. IBKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNEX's 7.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATCH scores 6/9 vs SNEX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | -7.0% | +12.0% | +19.3% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | -2.0% | +1.8% | +1.0% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.3% | +4.4% | +9.1% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | +2.7% | +10.4% | +10.7% | +22.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.17x | 5.35x | 7.79x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6.5B | -$89M | $22.8B | $16.9B | -$4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.5B | $177M | $302M | $1.6B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $88M | $23.1B | $18.5B | $19M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.07x | -0.56x | 1.35x | 0.95x | 2.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNEX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNEX five years ago would be worth $64,791 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for ATCH. Over the past 12 months, SNEX leads with a +92.6% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNEX at 69.8% vs ATCH's -92.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | +3.8% | -32.4% | +86.2% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.2% | +4.5% | -8.0% | +92.6% | +86.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -78.2% | +59.2% | +389.3% | +332.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -95.8% | +63.7% | +547.9% | +386.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -83.2% | +603.4% | +1454.0% | +823.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.4% | -39.8% | +16.8% | +69.8% | +62.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFSI and SNEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATCH's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNEX currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ATCH's 13.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.58x | 2.27x | 0.93x | 1.08x | 1.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $2.70 | $160.36 | $124.19 | $87.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $1.17 | $82.67 | $53.53 | $44.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.9% | +60.0% | +55.3% | +97.3% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 57.1 | 40.4 | 68.4 | 74.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 582K | 604K | 874K | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SNEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPRO as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", SNEX as "Buy", IBKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 146.9% upside for LPRO (target: $4) vs 4.7% for IBKR (target: $88). For income investors, SNEX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.94% vs IBKR's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.00 | $143.00 | — | $87.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 20 | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | +2.9% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.16 | $3.55 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
SNEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). IBKR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is the stronger pick with 288.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?
On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. wins at 1. 13x versus StoneX Group Inc. 's 2. 33x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?
Over the past 5 years, StoneX Group Inc.
(SNEX) delivered a total return of +547. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNEX returned +1454% versus ATCH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning ATCH is approximately 177% more volatile than PFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for StoneX Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is pulling ahead at 288.
0% versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Open Lending Corporation grew EPS 96. 8% year-over-year, compared to -670. 6% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.
(ATCH) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus -4. 5% for Open Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus -45. 3% for ATCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFSI leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus StoneX Group Inc. 's 2. 33x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 33. 6x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPRO: 146. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?
In this comparison, SNEX (2.
9% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield), IBKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ATCH, LPRO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, StoneX Group Inc.
(SNEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 2. 9% yield, +1454% 10Y return). AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNEX: +1454%, ATCH: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATCH and LPRO and PFSI and SNEX and IBKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATCH (Technology) and LPRO (Financial Services) and PFSI (Financial Services) and SNEX (Financial Services) and IBKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATCH is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPRO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SNEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PFSI, SNEX pay a dividend while ATCH, LPRO, IBKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 16%
- Dividend Yield > 1.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.