Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
LPRO
Open Lending Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$192M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.62B
5Y Perf.+32.6%
SNEX
StoneX Group Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.51B
5Y Perf.+524.2%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.

Investment - Banking & Investment Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$37.30B
5Y Perf.+358.4%

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATCH logoATCH
LPRO logoLPRO
PFSI logoPFSI
SNEX logoSNEX
IBKR logoIBKR
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - Capital MarketsInvestment - Banking & Investment Services
Market Cap$2M$192M$4.62B$9.51B$37.30B
Revenue (TTM)$15M$93M$4.36B$132.38B$10.23B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-5M$507M$462M$984M
Gross Margin54.8%75.5%91.4%2.0%89.8%
Operating Margin-42.1%6.4%34.6%1.6%86.0%
Forward P/E14.9x7.2x21.0x33.6x
Total Debt$1.00B$88M$23.06B$18.52B$19M
Cash & Equiv.$7.53B$177M$302M$1.61B$4.96B

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATCH
LPRO
PFSI
SNEX
IBKR
StockMar 21May 26Return
AtlasClear Holdings… (ATCH)1000.0-100.0%
Open Lending Corpor… (LPRO)1004.6-95.4%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)100132.6+32.6%
StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX)100624.2+524.2%
Interactive Brokers… (IBKR)100458.4+358.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ATCH and PFSI are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. SNEX and LPRO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

ATCH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 12.1% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
  • 2.3% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
LPRO
Open Lending Corporation
The Banking Pick

LPRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 288.0%, EPS growth 96.8%
  • 288.0% NII/revenue growth vs IBKR's 9.8%
Best for: growth exposure
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (7.2x vs 21.0x)
  • Beta 0.93 vs ATCH's 2.58
Best for: value and stability
SNEX
StoneX Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

SNEX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 2.9%
  • 14.5% 10Y total return vs IBKR's 8.2%
  • Beta 1.08, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.57x
  • 2.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IBKR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

IBKR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.93, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 1.13x
  • PEG 1.13 vs SNEX's 2.33
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLPRO logoLPRO288.0% NII/revenue growth vs IBKR's 9.8%
ValuePFSI logoPFSILower P/E (7.2x vs 21.0x)
Quality / MarginsATCH logoATCH12.1% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
Stability / SafetyPFSI logoPFSIBeta 0.93 vs ATCH's 2.58
DividendsSNEX logoSNEX2.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IBKR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SNEX logoSNEX+92.6% vs PFSI's -8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ATCH logoATCH2.3% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0%

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATCHAtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LPROOpen Lending Corporation
FY 2025
Program Fee
64.9%$54M
Profit Share
35.1%$29M
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M
SNEXStoneX Group Inc.
FY 2025
Precious Metals Trading
96.4%$121.8B
Precious Metals Retail Sales
1.7%$2.1B
Commission And Clearing Fees
0.6%$728M
Sales Based Commissions
0.4%$478M
Exchange-Traded Futures And Options
0.3%$341M
Clearing Service
0.2%$207M
Consulting, Management And Account Fees
0.2%$206M
Other (16)
0.3%$416M
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Commissions
89.4%$2.1B
Risk Exposure Fees
3.3%$80M
Market Data Fees
3.3%$79M
Payments For Order Flow
2.1%$51M
Others
1.8%$44M

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSNEXLAGGINGPFSI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ATCH and IBKR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

SNEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $132.4B annually — 9058.6x ATCH's $15M. ATCH is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPRO's -4.5%.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SNEX logoSNEXStoneX Group Inc.IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$93M$4.4B$132.4B$10.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M-$5M$1.0B$47.1B$8.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$5M$507M$462M$984M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$425,000-$3.8B$6.5B$15.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.8%+75.5%+91.4%+2.0%+89.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-42.1%+6.4%+34.6%+1.6%+86.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%-4.5%+11.5%+0.2%+9.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.6%-3.5%-32.4%+3.3%+153.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+84.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%+7.7%+46.8%+26.0%
Evenly matched — ATCH and IBKR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PFSI and IBKR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 75% valuation discount to IBKR's 37.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBKR offers better value at 1.27x vs SNEX's 2.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SNEX logoSNEXStoneX Group Inc.IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
Market CapShares × price$2M$192M$4.6B$9.5B$37.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$6.5B$103M$27.4B$26.4B$32.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.70x-45.38x9.53x20.53x37.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.92x7.17x20.99x33.59x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.28x1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.25x18.11x12.28x3.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.15x2.05x1.06x0.07x3.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.56x1.11x2.55x1.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.02x2.20x2.37x
Evenly matched — PFSI and IBKR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SNEX delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for LPRO. IBKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNEX's 7.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATCH scores 6/9 vs SNEX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SNEX logoSNEXStoneX Group Inc.IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.1%-7.0%+12.0%+19.3%+5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.3%-2.0%+1.8%+1.0%+0.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+4.4%+9.1%+24.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.0%+2.7%+10.4%+10.7%+22.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.17x5.35x7.79x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6.5B-$89M$22.8B$16.9B-$4.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.5B$177M$302M$1.6B$5.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$88M$23.1B$18.5B$19M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.07x-0.56x1.35x0.95x2.13x
IBKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SNEX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SNEX five years ago would be worth $64,791 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for ATCH. Over the past 12 months, SNEX leads with a +92.6% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNEX at 69.8% vs ATCH's -92.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SNEX logoSNEXStoneX Group Inc.IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.0%+3.8%-32.4%+86.2%+24.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.2%+4.5%-8.0%+92.6%+86.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-78.2%+59.2%+389.3%+332.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-95.8%+63.7%+547.9%+386.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-83.2%+603.4%+1454.0%+823.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-92.4%-39.8%+16.8%+69.8%+62.9%
SNEX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PFSI and SNEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATCH's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNEX currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ATCH's 13.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SNEX logoSNEXStoneX Group Inc.IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.58x2.27x0.93x1.08x1.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.92$2.70$160.36$124.19$87.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$1.17$82.67$53.53$44.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.9%+60.0%+55.3%+97.3%+95.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.557.140.468.474.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.1M582K604K874K4.5M
Evenly matched — PFSI and SNEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SNEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LPRO as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", SNEX as "Buy", IBKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 146.9% upside for LPRO (target: $4) vs 4.7% for IBKR (target: $88). For income investors, SNEX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.94% vs IBKR's 0.36%.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SNEX logoSNEXStoneX Group Inc.IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$143.00$87.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1220219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+2.9%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12233
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.16$3.55$0.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%+0.1%0.0%+0.2%
SNEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SNEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). IBKR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallStoneX Group Inc. (SNEX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SNEX vs IBKR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is the stronger pick with 288.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?

On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. wins at 1. 13x versus StoneX Group Inc. 's 2. 33x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?

Over the past 5 years, StoneX Group Inc.

(SNEX) delivered a total return of +547. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNEX returned +1454% versus ATCH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning ATCH is approximately 177% more volatile than PFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for StoneX Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is pulling ahead at 288.

0% versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Open Lending Corporation grew EPS 96. 8% year-over-year, compared to -670. 6% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?

AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

(ATCH) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus -4. 5% for Open Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus -45. 3% for ATCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFSI leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus StoneX Group Inc. 's 2. 33x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 33. 6x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPRO: 146. 9% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR?

In this comparison, SNEX (2.

9% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield), IBKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ATCH, LPRO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SNEX or IBKR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, StoneX Group Inc.

(SNEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 2. 9% yield, +1454% 10Y return). AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNEX: +1454%, ATCH: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ATCH and LPRO and PFSI and SNEX and IBKR?

These companies operate in different sectors (ATCH (Technology) and LPRO (Financial Services) and PFSI (Financial Services) and SNEX (Financial Services) and IBKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATCH is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPRO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SNEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PFSI, SNEX pay a dividend while ATCH, LPRO, IBKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ATCH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 42%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPRO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 144%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNEX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBKR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ATCH and LPRO and PFSI and SNEX and IBKR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ATCH: 84.1% · LPRO: 288.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.