Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Telecommunications Services
Consumer Electronics
ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Telecommunications Services | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $1.05B | $7.20B | $230.92B | $10.56B | $4.31T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $829M | $44.49B | $283M | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $81M | $366M | $9.92B | $-14M | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 83.4% | 54.8% | 40.9% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 49.6% | 25.5% | 8.6% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 38.8x | 20.4x | — | 33.7x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $506M | $16.37B | $546M | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $739M | $7.84B | $447M | $35.93B |
ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterix Inc. (ATEX) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 508.7 | +408.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 270.9 | +170.9% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1840.6 | +1740.6% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 368.9 | +268.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 43.9%, EPS growth -24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.23x
- 43.9% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
- 18.7% margin vs GSAT's -5.0%
IDCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.74 vs QCOM's 9.80
- PEG 0.74 vs 1.89
QCOM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
- Beta 1.64, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
- 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
GSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +306.6% vs IDCC's +33.2%
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.0% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 438.2%
- 34.0% ROA vs GSAT's -0.6%, ROIC 67.4% vs 2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.9% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.74 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs GSAT's -5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs GSAT's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.6% vs IDCC's +33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs GSAT's -0.6%, ROIC 67.4% vs 2.3% |
ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATEX leads in 2 of 6 categories
IDCC leads 1 • AAPL leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • QCOM leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATEX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 103565.5x ATEX's $4M. ATEX is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -5.0%. On growth, GSAT holds the edge at +16.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $829M | $44.5B | $283M | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $84M | $489M | $12.8B | $108M | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $81M | $366M | $9.9B | -$14M | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $580M | $12.5B | $45M | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +83.4% | +54.8% | +40.9% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +49.6% | +25.5% | +8.6% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +44.2% | +22.3% | -5.0% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +70.0% | +28.1% | +15.8% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -2.4% | -3.5% | +16.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -185.4% | -38.0% | +173.0% | 0.0% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, IDCC trades at a 46% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $7.2B | $230.9B | $10.6B | $4.31T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $7.0B | $239.5B | $10.7B | $4.38T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -91.67x | 23.70x | 43.73x | -547.27x | 39.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.64x | 38.80x | 20.37x | — | 33.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 21.03x | — | 2.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.96x | 17.16x | 104.40x | 30.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 173.66x | 8.63x | 5.21x | 38.67x | 10.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.63x | 8.75x | 11.42x | 29.25x | 59.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.62x | 18.01x | 137.46x | 43.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GSAT. ATEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs ATEX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.5% | +33.4% | +40.2% | -3.9% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.5% | +17.7% | +18.4% | -0.6% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | +40.9% | +29.1% | +2.3% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.8% | +38.1% | +28.9% | +0.8% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.46x | 0.77x | 1.54x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | -$233M | $8.5B | $99M | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $739M | $7.8B | $447M | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $506M | $16.4B | $546M | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.48x | 17.60x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $50,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,628 for ATEX. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +306.6% total return vs IDCC's +33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.5% vs AAPL's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +151.6% | -13.9% | +27.2% | +28.3% | +8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +96.1% | +33.2% | +53.4% | +306.6% | +49.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | +252.7% | +111.7% | +488.5% | +70.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.3% | +312.8% | +82.3% | +402.1% | +134.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | +438.2% | +382.4% | +204.0% | +1199.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.8% | +52.2% | +28.4% | +80.5% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ATEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATEX is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSAT's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATEX currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs IDCC's 67.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.11x | 1.64x | 2.04x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.10 | $412.60 | $228.04 | $82.85 | $294.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.58 | $205.78 | $121.99 | $17.24 | $193.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +67.8% | +96.1% | +99.1% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 31.2 | 82.6 | 64.2 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 303K | 392K | 15.6M | 1.5M | 40.0M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATEX as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", GSAT as "Hold", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs -19.6% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.57% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $425.00 | $185.56 | $66.00 | $319.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 16 | 69 | 5 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +1.6% | +0.1% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 23 | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.76 | $3.44 | $0.08 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +1.4% | +3.8% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
ATEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). IDCC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ATEX vs IDCC vs QCOM vs GSAT vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Anterix Inc.
(ATEX) is the stronger pick with 43. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anterix Inc. (ATEX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Anterix Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InterDigital, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +402. 1%, compared to +16. 3% for Anterix Inc. (ATEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1199% versus ATEX's +45. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anterix Inc.
(ATEX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Globalstar, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning GSAT is approximately 100% more volatile than ATEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anterix Inc. (ATEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 154% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anterix Inc.
(ATEX) is pulling ahead at 43. 9% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Globalstar, Inc. grew EPS 74. 6% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATEX leads at 77. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -188. 6% for Anterix Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -194. 2% for ATEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Anterix Inc. (ATEX) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for InterDigital, Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 0% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
6% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ATEX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATEX or IDCC or QCOM or GSAT or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1199% 10Y return). Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1199%, GSAT: +204. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATEX and IDCC and QCOM and GSAT and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATEX (Communication Services) and IDCC (Technology) and QCOM (Technology) and GSAT (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. IDCC, QCOM pay a dividend while ATEX, GSAT, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.