Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Real Estate - Services
ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $2.27B | $704M | $3.77B | $86.77B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.28B | $724M | $957M | $22.52B | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $835M | $27M | $149M | $1.60B | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 74.4% | 82.9% | 89.9% | 20.0% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 9.7% | 19.7% | 9.2% | -9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 5.8x | 15.1x | 51.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $468M | $191M | $633M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.25B | $56M | $191M | $2.33B | $962M |
ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autohome Inc. (ATHM) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Cars.com Inc. (CARS) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) | 100 | 150.5 | +50.5% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | 100 | 333.0 | +233.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 6.00x
- PEG 0.27 vs CARG's 0.85
- Beta 0.81, yield 9.5%, current ratio 6.00x
Among these 5 stocks, CARS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CARG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 15.6% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
- 23.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 36.2% vs -15.8%
CVNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth 431.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.3%
- 35.1% 10Y total return vs CARG's 38.4%
- 48.6% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs ATHM's -17.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 51.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 9.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs ATHM's -17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 36.2% vs -15.8% |
ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 1 • CVNA leads 1 • ATHM leads 1 • CARS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVNA is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.5B annually — 31.1x CARS's $724M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, ATHM holds the edge at +152.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $724M | $957M | $22.5B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $322M | $152M | $218M | $2.3B | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $835M | $27M | $149M | $1.6B | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $771M | $158M | $281M | $740M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.4% | +82.9% | +89.9% | +20.0% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +9.7% | +19.7% | +9.2% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +3.7% | +15.6% | +7.1% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +21.8% | +29.3% | +3.3% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.2% | +0.7% | +8.2% | +52.0% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +3.6% | -8.1% | +11.9% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.9x trailing earnings, ATHM trades at a 94% valuation discount to CVNA's 47.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATHM offers better value at 0.27x vs CARG's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $704M | $3.8B | $86.8B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $1.1B | $3.8B | $85.1B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.89x | 38.56x | 24.62x | 47.36x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.74x | 5.84x | 15.14x | 51.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.27x | — | 1.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.03x | 7.34x | 16.64x | 39.46x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 0.97x | 4.02x | 4.27x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 1.61x | 9.87x | 21.36x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.03x | 4.78x | 13.06x | 97.60x | 3.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA delivers a 45.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. CVNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARS's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARS scores 7/9 vs ATHM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +5.7% | +41.9% | +45.9% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +2.5% | +23.2% | +13.8% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +5.0% | +36.2% | +34.3% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +6.2% | +30.1% | +20.0% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.99x | 0.51x | 0.15x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | $412M | $315,000 | -$1.7B | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $56M | $191M | $2.3B | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $468M | $191M | $633M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.76x | — | -0.68x | -8.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVNA five years ago would be worth $16,150 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,697 for ATHM. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs ATHM's -17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVNA at 2.3% vs CARS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | +2.5% | +1.4% | -0.0% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.6% | +9.0% | +34.6% | +54.4% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | -31.3% | +134.8% | +3441.8% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.0% | -11.8% | +39.5% | +61.5% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.1% | -54.8% | +38.4% | +3505.6% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -11.8% | +32.9% | +2.3% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHM and CARG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHM is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.27x | 0.89x | 2.14x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.92 | $13.97 | $39.42 | $486.89 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.74 | $7.40 | $26.39 | $255.79 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +88.3% | +96.8% | +82.2% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 68.9 | 60.4 | 57.4 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 764K | 1.5M | 1.1M | 2.7M | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
ATHM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATHM as "Buy", CARS as "Buy", CARG as "Buy", CVNA as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 125.8% upside for ATHM (target: $44) vs -1.9% for CARG (target: $37). ATHM is the only dividend payer here at 9.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.67 | $13.00 | $37.42 | $484.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 16 | 23 | 44 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $12.55 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.8% | +12.4% | +9.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ATHM vs CARS vs CARG vs CVNA vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is the stronger pick with 48. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Autohome Inc. (ATHM) offers the better valuation at 2. 9x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Autohome Inc. (ATHM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN?
On trailing P/E, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the cheapest at 2. 9x versus Carvana Co. at 47. 4x. On forward P/E, Cars. com Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, Carvana Co.
(CVNA) delivered a total return of +61. 5%, compared to -73. 0% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVNA returned +35. 1% versus CARS's -54. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 282% more volatile than ATHM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 99% for Cars. com Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is pulling ahead at 48. 6% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVNA leads at 14. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN?
Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARG leads at 20. 7% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARG leads at 89. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cars.
com Inc. (CARS) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 4x for Carvana Co. — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATHM: 125. 8% to $43. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN?
In this comparison, ATHM (9.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CARS, CARG, CVNA, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATHM or CARS or CARG or CVNA or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 9. 5% yield). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHM: +0. 1%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATHM and CARS and CARG and CVNA and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATHM (Communication Services) and CARS (Consumer Cyclical) and CARG (Consumer Cyclical) and CVNA (Consumer Cyclical) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATHM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVNA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ATHM pays a dividend while CARS, CARG, CVNA, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.