Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $2.27B | $2.91B | $704M | $3.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.28B | $1.93B | $724M | $957M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $835M | $178M | $27M | $149M |
| Gross Margin | 74.4% | 46.2% | 82.9% | 89.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 10.2% | 9.7% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 19.3x | 5.8x | 15.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.42B | $468M | $191M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.25B | $142M | $56M | $191M |
ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autohome Inc. (ATHM) | 100 | 25.1 | -74.9% |
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 198.7 | +98.7% |
| Cars.com Inc. (CARS) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
| CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 9.5%
- PEG 0.27 vs CARG's 0.85
- Beta 0.81, yield 9.5%, current ratio 6.00x
- Beta 0.81 vs CARS's 1.27
KAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 264.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- 99.2% 10Y total return vs CARG's 38.4%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs ATHM's -10.8%
- +43.1% vs ATHM's -17.6%
CARS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 15.1x)
CARG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 51.0%, current ratio 2.81x
- 15.6% margin vs CARS's 3.7%
- 23.2% ROA vs CARS's 2.5%, ROIC 36.2% vs 5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs ATHM's -10.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 15.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs CARS's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs CARS's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 9.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs KAR's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.1% vs ATHM's -17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.2% ROA vs CARS's 2.5%, ROIC 36.2% vs 5.0% |
ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CARS leads 1 • KAR leads 1 • ATHM leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 8.7x CARS's $724M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CARS's 3.7%. On growth, ATHM holds the edge at +152.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $1.9B | $724M | $957M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $322M | $288M | $152M | $218M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $835M | $178M | $27M | $149M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $771M | $337M | $158M | $281M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.4% | +46.2% | +82.9% | +89.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +10.2% | +9.7% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +9.2% | +3.7% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +17.4% | +21.8% | +29.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.2% | +0.5% | +0.7% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +89.7% | +3.6% | -8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CARS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.9x trailing earnings, ATHM trades at a 93% valuation discount to CARS's 38.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATHM offers better value at 0.27x vs CARG's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.9B | $704M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $4.2B | $1.1B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.89x | 16.73x | 38.56x | 24.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.74x | 19.31x | 5.84x | 15.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.27x | — | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.03x | 14.55x | 7.34x | 16.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 1.51x | 0.97x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 1.93x | 1.61x | 9.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.03x | 8.66x | 4.78x | 13.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $3 for ATHM. CARG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARS's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs ATHM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +11.6% | +5.7% | +41.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +3.8% | +2.5% | +23.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +6.9% | +5.0% | +36.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +9.4% | +6.2% | +30.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.93x | 0.99x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | $1.3B | $412M | $315,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $142M | $56M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.4B | $468M | $191M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.09x | 3.76x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KAR five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,697 for ATHM. Over the past 12 months, KAR leads with a +43.1% total return vs ATHM's -17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARG at 32.9% vs CARS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | -6.1% | +2.5% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.6% | +43.1% | +9.0% | +34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | +82.3% | -31.3% | +134.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.0% | +61.6% | -11.8% | +39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.1% | +99.2% | -54.8% | +38.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | +22.2% | -11.8% | +32.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHM and CARG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHM is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CARS's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ATHM's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.98x | 1.27x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.92 | $31.78 | $13.97 | $39.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.74 | $19.02 | $7.40 | $26.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +86.3% | +88.3% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 40.9 | 68.9 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 764K | 976K | 1.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ATHM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATHM as "Buy", KAR as "Buy", CARS as "Buy", CARG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.8% upside for ATHM (target: $44) vs -1.9% for CARG (target: $37). For income investors, ATHM offers the higher dividend yield at 9.54% vs KAR's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.67 | $32.00 | $13.00 | $37.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 18 | 16 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.5% | +1.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $12.55 | $0.36 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.8% | +1.6% | +12.4% | +9.3% |
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CARS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ATHM vs KAR vs CARS vs CARG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). Autohome Inc. (ATHM) offers the better valuation at 2. 9x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Autohome Inc. (ATHM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG?
On trailing P/E, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the cheapest at 2. 9x versus Cars. com Inc. at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, Cars. com Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG?
Over the past 5 years, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -73. 0% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KAR returned +99. 2% versus CARS's -54. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Cars. com Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning CARS is approximately 57% more volatile than ATHM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 99% for Cars. com Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -10. 8% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -55. 6% for Cars. com Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KAR leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG?
Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus 2. 8% for Cars. com Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARG leads at 20. 7% versus 8. 3% for CARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARG leads at 89. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cars.
com Inc. (CARS) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for OPENLANE, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATHM: 125. 8% to $43. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG?
In this comparison, ATHM (9.
5% yield), KAR (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CARS, CARG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATHM or KAR or CARS or CARG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 9. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHM: +0. 1%, CARS: -54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATHM and KAR and CARS and CARG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATHM (Communication Services) and KAR (Consumer Cyclical) and CARS (Consumer Cyclical) and CARG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATHM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ATHM, KAR pay a dividend while CARS, CARG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.