Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Information Technology Services
ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $33M | $525M | $1.99B | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $335M | $927M | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-476K | $107M | $314M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.8% | 66.5% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.6% | 47.9% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 21.9x | 7.3x | 9.2x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $152M | $68M | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $199M | $1.21B | $1.35B |
ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlphaVest Acquisiti… (ATMV) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 642.5 | +542.5% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 354.0 | +254.0% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATMV plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ACIC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ACIC's -22.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.24x
PSFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 9.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs ATMV's -59.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.4% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs 3.6% |
ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 4 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • ATMV leads 0 • ACIC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and ATMV operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $335M | $927M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $154M | $454M | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$476,106 | $107M | $314M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51,618 | $71M | $431M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +63.8% | +66.5% | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.6% | +47.9% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.9% | +33.9% | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% | +46.4% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.3% | +11.9% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.0% | +4.3% | +23.4% | -183.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.0x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 77% valuation discount to ATMV's 21.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HCI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATMV's 20.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $525M | $2.0B | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $478M | $844M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.91x | 5.05x | 6.15x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.33x | 9.19x | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.13x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.05x | 2.93x | 1.92x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.56x | 2.20x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.43x | 1.70x | 1.77x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1082.23x | 7.40x | 4.47x | 2.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs PSFE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +35.7% | +32.0% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +9.0% | +13.2% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +41.0% | +6.8% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +26.0% | +40.6% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.48x | 0.06x | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$46M | -$1.1B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4,215 | $199M | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $152M | $68M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.20x | 67.24x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, HCI leads with a +2.4% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +1.9% | -16.7% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.5% | -0.3% | +2.4% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +159.1% | +209.6% | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +107.0% | +105.3% | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | -22.2% | +436.8% | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.1% | +37.3% | +45.7% | -13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACIC and HCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACIC currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs ATMV's 24.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.39x | 0.39x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.00 | $13.06 | $210.50 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.43 | $9.79 | $136.37 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.5% | +83.1% | +72.6% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 31.0 | 48.7 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.6M | 188K | 167K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
HCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", HCI as "Buy", PSFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for PSFE (target: $10) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). HCI is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.90 | $126.50 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.50 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +20.9% |
HCI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ATMV vs ACIC vs HCI vs PSFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 5. 0x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 5.
0x versus AlphaVest Acquisition Corp at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 501% more volatile than HCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 0. 0% for ATMV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for HCI Group, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSFE: 6. 5% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE?
In this comparison, HCI (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ATMV, ACIC, PSFE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATMV or ACIC or HCI or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 0% yield, +436. 8% 10Y return). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCI: +436. 8%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATMV and ACIC and HCI and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATMV (Financial Services) and ACIC (Financial Services) and HCI (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATMV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HCI pays a dividend while ATMV, ACIC, PSFE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.