Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $1.10B | $1.69B | $24.95B | $7.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $361M | $55M | $3.17B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-24M | $-164M | $1.29B | $317M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 79.3% | 99.6% | 86.6% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | -279.8% | 4.1% | -237.9% | 45.3% | 58.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 217.8x | — | 19.4x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $473M | $149M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $75M | $15M | $1.56B | $134M |
ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avenue Therapeutics… (ATXI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| United Therapeutics… (UTHR) | 100 | 482.6 | +382.6% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATXI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MNKD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.2% vs MNKD's -26.8%
UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- 40.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
HALO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs UTHR's 410.0%
- PEG 0.35 vs UTHR's 1.01
- 37.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 19.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.2% ROA vs ATXI's -105.8% |
ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories
UTHR leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • ATXI leads 0 • MNKD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2257.7x ATXI's $1M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $361M | $55M | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $25M | -$130M | $1.6B | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$24M | -$164M | $1.3B | $317M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $13M | -$209M | $1.0B | $645M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +79.3% | +99.6% | +86.6% | +81.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +4.1% | -2.4% | +45.3% | +58.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -6.6% | -3.0% | +40.6% | +22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -124.1% | +3.6% | -3.8% | +32.1% | +46.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.1% | -25.3% | -1.6% | +51.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.1% | -2.2% | -4.5% | -12.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, UTHR trades at a 88% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UTHR offers better value at 1.06x vs HALO's 1.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $1.1B | $1.7B | $24.9B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$842,479 | $1.5B | $1.8B | $23.4B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | 177.50x | -8.57x | 20.43x | 25.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 217.79x | — | 19.38x | 8.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.06x | 1.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.26x | — | 14.82x | 8.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.14x | 30.64x | 7.84x | 5.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.84x | — | 15.66x | 3.84x | 165.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 80.08x | — | 23.97x | 11.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UTHR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UTHR scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -160.6% | — | -4.0% | +19.2% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -105.8% | -3.9% | -62.8% | +17.2% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +21.6% | -57.2% | +21.1% | +73.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.0% | +8.3% | -55.7% | +21.4% | +38.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.66x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $399M | $134M | -$1.6B | -$134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $75M | $15M | $1.6B | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $473M | $149M | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | -4.74x | 125.37x | 46.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UTHR five years ago would be worth $29,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for ATXI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs ATXI's -80.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.8% | -36.6% | +92.0% | +14.6% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +150.1% | -26.8% | +818.2% | +85.4% | -7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -8.5% | +621.8% | +170.4% | +115.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -17.2% | -72.3% | +191.3% | +37.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -46.2% | -59.1% | +410.0% | +570.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.7% | -2.9% | +93.3% | +39.3% | +29.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATXI and UTHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATXI is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTHR currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs MNKD's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.11x | 0.90x | 1.85x | 0.19x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.97 | $6.51 | $109.00 | $609.35 | $82.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $2.23 | $7.99 | $272.12 | $47.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.7% | +54.5% | +76.5% | +93.4% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 74.3 | 53.4 | 65.0 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 6.4M | 991K | 516K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNKD as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", HALO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.2% upside for MNKD (target: $7) vs 7.3% for UTHR (target: $611).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $132.83 | $610.67 | $78.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 33 | 30 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.5% |
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UTHR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ATXI vs MNKD vs NKTR vs UTHR vs HALO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO?
On trailing P/E, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the cheapest at 20.
4x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus United Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO?
Over the past 5 years, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) delivered a total return of +191.
3%, compared to -100. 0% for Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus ATXI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avenue Therapeutics, Inc.
(ATXI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately -1782% more volatile than ATXI relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 98. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO?
United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
9% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -279. 8% for ATXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATXI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus United Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 209. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 97. 2% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ATXI or MNKD or NKTR or UTHR or HALO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), +410. 0% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +410. 0%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATXI and MNKD and NKTR and UTHR and HALO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.