Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $387M | $2.35B | $775M | $2.58B | $240M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $148M | $867M | $634M | $1.12B | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $169M | $-128M | $224M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 72.1% | 3.2% | 71.0% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 25.3% | -26.9% | 25.5% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 10.8x | 14.9x | 11.2x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $288M | $327M | $147M | $1.12B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $185M | $12M | $668M | $78M |
AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.6 | +43.6% |
| Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 184.1 | +84.1% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 268.7 | +168.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.59 vs EGBN's 1.21
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.88, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
EGBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- +33.0% vs NBTB's +4.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBC's 0.6%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs EGBN's 2.6%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4%
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 281.8% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 120.3%
- PEG 0.75 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.2x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.39
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.2x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.39 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs EGBN's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.0% vs NBTB's +4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBC's 0.6% |
AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • AVBC leads 0 • EGBN leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRMK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 10.0x FUNC's $112M. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGBN's -20.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $867M | $634M | $1.1B | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $241M | -$168M | $323M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $169M | -$128M | $224M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $225M | -$6M | $230M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +72.1% | +3.2% | +71.0% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +25.3% | -26.9% | +25.5% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +19.5% | -20.2% | +20.0% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +25.2% | +3.3% | +20.7% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.6% | +39.5% | -50.0% | +5.4% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EGBN and FUNC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 13% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.04x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $387M | $2.3B | $775M | $2.6B | $240M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $659M | $2.5B | $910M | $3.0B | $350M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -107.06x | 13.51x | -6.03x | 11.84x | 11.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.71x | 10.80x | 14.92x | 11.22x | 8.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | — | 1.47x | 1.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.33x | — | 9.29x | 11.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.71x | 1.22x | 2.30x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.21x | 0.67x | 1.25x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.73x | 37.31x | 11.12x | 11.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-11 for EGBN. EGBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs AVBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.2% | +9.5% | -10.9% | +10.8% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.1% | -1.2% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +7.9% | -8.2% | +7.1% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.4% | -2.9% | +3.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.17x | 0.13x | 0.53x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $272M | $142M | $135M | $448M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $185M | $12M | $668M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $288M | $327M | $147M | $1.1B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.13x | 1.05x | -0.51x | 0.75x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,855 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,962 for EGBN. Over the past 12 months, EGBN leads with a +33.0% total return vs NBTB's +4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.1% vs AVBC's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +9.0% | +21.9% | +12.7% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.0% | +4.0% | +33.0% | +23.7% | +20.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | +51.1% | +66.8% | +125.5% | +212.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | +35.1% | -40.4% | +47.7% | +128.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | +101.0% | -33.1% | +120.3% | +281.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +14.7% | +18.6% | +31.1% | +46.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVBC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EGBN's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs EGBN's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.88x | 1.21x | 0.92x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.43 | $46.92 | $29.26 | $45.99 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.00 | $39.20 | $15.03 | $33.39 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +95.9% | +86.8% | +95.2% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.9 | 53.2 | 44.3 | 48.2 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 238K | 277K | 374K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", EGBN as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.9% upside for EGBN (target: $29) vs -32.4% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs EGBN's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $28.67 | $45.50 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 14 | 9 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +2.0% | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 | $0.51 | $0.97 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.7% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NBTB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
AVBC vs NBTB vs EGBN vs TRMK vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 75x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +128.
5%, compared to -40. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +281. 8% versus EGBN's -33. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avidia Bancorp, Inc.
(AVBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Eagle Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EGBN is approximately 106% more volatile than AVBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -169. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus -20. 2% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus -26. 9% for EGBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGBN: 12. 9% to $28. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), TRMK (2. 2% yield), EGBN (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. AVBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVBC or NBTB or EGBN or TRMK or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), 2. 2% yield, +281. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +281. 8%, EGBN: -33. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVBC and NBTB and EGBN and TRMK and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AVBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; EGBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. NBTB, EGBN, TRMK, FUNC pay a dividend while AVBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.