Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $86M | $225M | $46M | $753M | $803M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $523M | $353M | $51M | $565M | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $47M | $4M | $43M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 29.2% | 96.7% | 84.4% | 70.0% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 50.5% | 11.0% | 28.1% | 33.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 8.0x | 13.3x | 21.1x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $316M | $6M | $526M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $202M | $21M | $10M | $104M |
AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Vanguard C… (AVD) | 100 | 22.6 | -77.4% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 25.9x)
MFIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- Rev growth 21.1%, EPS growth 17.1%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs AVD's -5.9%
HGBL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.66 vs PRAA's 1.82
- 4.1% ROA vs AVD's -7.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 1.3%
WRLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 266.2% 10Y total return vs MFIN's 60.3%
- NIM 41.9% vs HGBL's 0.2%
- 15.9% margin vs PRAA's -24.6%
PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +57.2% vs HGBL's -32.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs AVD's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs PRAA's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs PRAA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AVD's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.2% vs HGBL's -32.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs AVD's -7.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 1.3% |
AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
AVD leads 1 • HGBL leads 0 • WRLD leads 0 • PRAA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WRLD and PRAA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 24.3x HGBL's $51M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $523M | $353M | $51M | $565M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $111M | $7M | $61M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $47M | $4M | $43M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $126M | -$2M | $252M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +96.7% | +84.4% | +70.0% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +50.5% | +11.0% | +28.1% | +33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +12.2% | +7.0% | +15.9% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +35.7% | -4.6% | +44.3% | -7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.3% | +16.3% | — | -107.8% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AVD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 60% valuation discount to HGBL's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVD's 10.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $86M | $225M | $46M | $753M | $803M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $340M | $31M | $1.3B | $731M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.71x | 5.37x | 13.30x | 9.17x | -2.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.89x | 7.97x | — | 21.15x | 25.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.45x | 1.90x | 4.65x | 7.53x | 1.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.64x | 0.91x | 1.33x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 0.46x | 0.70x | 1.87x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.78x | — | 3.01x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HGBL and WRLD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WRLD's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs PRAA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.9% | +9.4% | +5.4% | +10.8% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.1% | +1.6% | +4.1% | +4.0% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +17.2% | +6.0% | +12.1% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +10.0% | +8.0% | +16.3% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.62x | 0.09x | 1.20x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | $115M | -$15M | $516M | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $202M | $21M | $10M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $316M | $6M | $526M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | 1.07x | 41.70x | 1.13x | 0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFIN five years ago would be worth $12,317 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,664 for AVD. Over the past 12 months, PRAA leads with a +57.2% total return vs HGBL's -32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFIN at 16.7% vs AVD's -44.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.3% | -4.9% | +8.1% | +5.5% | +19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.4% | +8.2% | -32.8% | +12.8% | +57.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.9% | +58.9% | -53.5% | +32.8% | -39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | +23.2% | -57.4% | +11.3% | -46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | +60.3% | +639.3% | +266.2% | -32.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.5% | +16.7% | -22.5% | +9.9% | -15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HGBL and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HGBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs AVD's 50.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.15x | 0.66x | 1.27x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.92 | $11.00 | $2.32 | $185.48 | $22.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.05 | $7.88 | $1.13 | $110.00 | $10.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.7% | +86.9% | +57.3% | +80.6% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 55.0 | 45.0 | 53.8 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 364K | 59K | 66K | 160K | 449K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVD as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", WRLD as "Hold", PRAA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 466.7% upside for AVD (target: $17) vs 24.5% for PRAA (target: $26). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs AVD's 2.94%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | — | — | — | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 9 | — | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +4.7% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.45 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.4% | +5.7% | +7.2% | +2.5% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). AVD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AVD vs MFIN vs HGBL vs WRLD vs PRAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Vanguard Corporation (AVD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Heritage Global Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, American Vanguard Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA?
Over the past 5 years, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -83. 4% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HGBL returned +639. 3% versus AVD's -71. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heritage Global Inc.
(HGBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus PRA Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning PRAA is approximately 175% more volatile than HGBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 120% for World Acceptance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -5. 9% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Vanguard Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 1. 3% for AVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Vanguard Corporation (AVD) trades at 7.
9x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for PRA Group, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVD: 466. 7% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), AVD (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. HGBL, WRLD, PRAA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVD or MFIN or HGBL or WRLD or PRAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heritage Global Inc.
(HGBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +639. 3% 10Y return). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HGBL: +639. 3%, PRAA: -32. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVD and MFIN and HGBL and WRLD and PRAA?
These companies operate in different sectors (AVD (Basic Materials) and MFIN (Financial Services) and HGBL (Financial Services) and WRLD (Financial Services) and PRAA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AVD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HGBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AVD, MFIN pay a dividend while HGBL, WRLD, PRAA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.