Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.33B
5Y Perf.+185.9%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.-58.8%
ALKS
Alkermes plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$5.90B
5Y Perf.+116.4%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.32B
5Y Perf.+19.5%
MCK
McKesson Corporation

Medical - Distribution

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$92.15B
5Y Perf.+374.1%

AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AXSM logoAXSM
DBVT logoDBVT
ALKS logoALKS
IQV logoIQV
MCK logoMCK
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Distribution
Market Cap$11.33B$1712.35T$5.90B$30.32B$92.15B
Revenue (TTM)$708M$0.00$1.56B$16.63B$403.43B
Net Income (TTM)$-188M$-168M$153M$1.39B$4.76B
Gross Margin92.6%65.4%26.1%3.6%
Operating Margin-24.8%12.3%13.9%1.5%
Forward P/E24.8x14.1x19.3x
Total Debt$241M$22M$70M$16.17B$7.39B
Cash & Equiv.$323M$194M$1.12B$1.98B$5.69B

AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AXSM
DBVT
ALKS
IQV
MCK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM)100285.9+185.9%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10041.2-58.8%
Alkermes plc (ALKS)100216.4+116.4%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100119.5+19.5%
McKesson Corporation (MCK)100474.1+374.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCK leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. DBVT, ALKS, and IQV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

AXSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
  • 18.9% 10Y total return vs MCK's 348.1%
  • 65.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Momentum Pick

DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +110.4% vs MCK's +4.6%
Best for: momentum
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Defensive Pick

ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
  • 9.8% margin vs AXSM's -26.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Pick

IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.35 vs MCK's 0.49
  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 19.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.49
Best for: valuation efficiency
MCK
McKesson Corporation
The Income Pick

MCK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 0.4%
  • Beta 0.04, yield 0.4%, current ratio 0.90x
  • Beta 0.04 vs IQV's 1.33
  • 0.4% yield; 17-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAXSM logoAXSM65.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueIQV logoIQVLower P/E (14.1x vs 19.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.49
Quality / MarginsALKS logoALKS9.8% margin vs AXSM's -26.6%
Stability / SafetyMCK logoMCKBeta 0.04 vs IQV's 1.33
DividendsMCK logoMCK0.4% yield; 17-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+110.4% vs MCK's +4.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MCK logoMCK5.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AXSMAxsome Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$634M
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALKSAlkermes plc
FY 2025
Vivitrol
39.8%$468M
Aristada And Aristada Initio
31.5%$370M
Manufactured Product And Royalty
24.8%$291M
Manufacturing Revenue
3.9%$46M
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M
MCKMcKesson Corporation
FY 2025
U.S. Pharmaceutical Segment
91.3%$327.7B
International Segment
4.1%$14.7B
Medical-Surgical Solutions Segment
3.2%$11.4B
Prescription Technology Solutions
1.5%$5.2B

AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCKLAGGINGALKS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — AXSM and ALKS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MCK and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $403.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXSM's -26.6%. On growth, AXSM holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcIQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$708M$0$1.6B$16.6B$403.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$167M-$112M$212M$3.5B$6.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$188M-$168M$153M$1.4B$4.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$71M-$151M$392M$2.7B$6.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+92.6%+65.4%+26.1%+3.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-24.8%+12.3%+13.9%+1.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-26.6%+9.8%+8.3%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.0%+25.1%+16.1%+1.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.4%+28.2%+8.4%+6.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.3%+91.5%-4.1%+15.0%+37.0%
Evenly matched — AXSM and ALKS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 22% valuation discount to MCK's 29.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs MCK's 0.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcIQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
Market CapShares × price$11.3B$1712.35T$5.9B$30.3B$92.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.2B$1712.35T$4.9B$44.5B$93.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-59.81x-0.76x24.76x22.79x29.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.06x19.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.56x0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.25x12.97x18.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue17.74x4.00x1.86x0.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share124.01x0.66x3.28x4.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.28x14.78x17.63x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXSM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs IQV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcIQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.6%-130.2%+8.8%+22.1%+3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-27.8%-89.0%+5.4%+4.7%+5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-19.1%+18.9%+8.7%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-52.1%-145.7%+14.2%+11.0%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944746
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.73x0.13x0.04x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$82M-$172M-$1.0B$14.2B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$323M$194M$1.1B$2.0B$5.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$241M$22M$70M$16.2B$7.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-34.13x-189.82x32.30x3.10x33.79x
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AXSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $38,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs MCK's +4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXSM at 41.5% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcIQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.2%+4.9%+25.3%-20.7%-8.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+98.5%+110.4%+16.5%+16.5%+4.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+183.2%+19.7%+14.5%-5.9%+106.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+286.4%-69.1%+60.9%-23.8%+286.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1886.5%-87.0%-11.0%+166.5%+348.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+41.5%+6.2%+4.6%-2.0%+27.3%
AXSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ALKS and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCK is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQV's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcIQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.69x1.26x1.06x1.33x0.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$233.75$26.18$36.60$247.05$999.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$96.09$7.53$25.17$134.65$637.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.2%+76.3%+96.7%+72.3%+75.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10078.848.160.258.516.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded667K252K2.3M1.6M757K
Evenly matched — ALKS and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MCK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AXSM as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 2.6% for AXSM (target: $226). MCK is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcIQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$225.86$46.33$44.00$225.63$1006.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2515284431
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00217
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.69
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.5%+4.1%+3.4%
MCK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MCK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMcKesson Corporation (MCK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AXSM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV vs MCK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(AXSM) is the stronger pick with 65. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. (AXSM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK?

On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus McKesson Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus McKesson Corporation's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK?

Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +286.

9%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +1886% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning IQV is approximately 2991% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(AXSM) is pulling ahead at 65. 5% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 38. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXSM leads at 133. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK?

Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

4% net margin versus -28. 7% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -26. 5% for AXSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus McKesson Corporation's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for McKesson Corporation — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK?

In this comparison, MCK (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. AXSM, DBVT, ALKS, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AXSM or DBVT or ALKS or IQV or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), +1886% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +1886%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AXSM and DBVT and ALKS and IQV and MCK?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AXSM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IQV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.