Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$58.96B
5Y Perf.+209.7%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.75B
5Y Perf.+400.6%
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$79.13B
5Y Perf.+240.0%
WMT
Walmart Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+214.9%
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.43B
5Y Perf.-58.9%

AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AZO logoAZO
MUSA logoMUSA
ORLY logoORLY
WMT logoWMT
AAP logoAAP
IndustryAuto - PartsSpecialty RetailAuto - PartsSpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$58.96B$10.75B$79.13B$1.04T$3.43B
Revenue (TTM)$19.29B$19.68B$18.21B$703.06B$8.57B
Net Income (TTM)$2.46B$554M$2.60B$22.91B$44M
Gross Margin52.1%5.5%51.6%24.9%43.2%
Operating Margin18.4%4.3%19.6%4.1%1.9%
Forward P/E23.9x19.8x29.2x44.7x20.7x
Total Debt$12.29B$3.25B$8.49B$67.09B$5.22B
Cash & Equiv.$272M$29M$194M$10.73B$3.12B

AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AZO
MUSA
ORLY
WMT
AAP
StockMay 20May 26Return
AutoZone, Inc. (AZO)100309.7+209.7%
Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)100500.6+400.6%
O'Reilly Automotive… (ORLY)100340.0+240.0%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)100314.9+214.9%
Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP)10041.1-58.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ORLY leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. MUSA and WMT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AZO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MUSA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 8.0% 10Y total return vs WMT's 499.5%
  • PEG 1.53 vs WMT's 4.06
  • Lower P/E (19.8x vs 20.7x)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
The Growth Play

ORLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 9.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
  • 6.4% revenue growth vs AAP's -5.4%
  • 14.3% margin vs AAP's 0.5%
  • 15.9% ROA vs AAP's 0.4%, ROIC 37.2% vs 2.9%
Best for: growth exposure
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick

WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
  • Beta 0.12 vs AAP's 1.42, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

AAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.42, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.75x
  • 1.7% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +85.7% vs AZO's -5.1%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthORLY logoORLY6.4% revenue growth vs AAP's -5.4%
ValueMUSA logoMUSALower P/E (19.8x vs 20.7x)
Quality / MarginsORLY logoORLY14.3% margin vs AAP's 0.5%
Stability / SafetyWMT logoWMTBeta 0.12 vs AAP's 1.42, lower leverage
DividendsAAP logoAAP1.7% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AAP logoAAP+85.7% vs AZO's -5.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ORLY logoORLY15.9% ROA vs AAP's 0.4%, ROIC 37.2% vs 2.9%

AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AZOAutoZone, Inc.
FY 2025
Auto Parts Locations
100.0%$18.9B
MUSAMurphy USA Inc.
FY 2025
Product
76.7%$14.9B
Merchandise
22.2%$4.3B
Product and Service, Other
1.1%$217M
ORLYO'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive Aftermarket Parts Segment
100.0%$17.8B
WMTWalmart Inc.
FY 2025
Walmart U S
68.6%$462.4B
Walmart International
18.1%$121.9B
Sams Club
13.4%$90.2B
AAPAdvance Auto Parts, Inc.
FY 2025
parts and batteries
64.0%$5.5B
Accessories and chemicals
21.0%$1.8B
engine maintenance [Domain]
14.0%$1.2B
other products
1.0%$86M

AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLORLYLAGGINGWMT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ORLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 82.0x AAP's $8.6B. ORLY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAP's 0.5%. On growth, ORLY holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAZO logoAZOAutoZone, Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.ORLY logoORLYO'Reilly Automoti…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.AAP logoAAPAdvance Auto Part…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19.3B$19.7B$18.2B$703.1B$8.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4.2B$1.1B$4.1B$42.8B$433M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.5B$554M$2.6B$22.9B$44M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.9B$555M$1.9B$15.3B-$298M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.1%+5.5%+51.6%+24.9%+43.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.4%+4.3%+19.6%+4.1%+1.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.8%+2.8%+14.3%+3.3%+0.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.6%+2.8%+10.5%+2.2%-3.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%+6.5%+10.2%+5.8%-1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.6%+176.8%+15.6%+35.1%+101.4%
ORLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AAP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 24.1x trailing earnings, MUSA trades at a 69% valuation discount to AAP's 78.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AZO offers better value at 1.63x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAZO logoAZOAutoZone, Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.ORLY logoORLYO'Reilly Automoti…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.AAP logoAAPAdvance Auto Part…
Market CapShares × price$59.0B$10.8B$79.1B$1.04T$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$71.0B$14.0B$87.4B$1.09T$5.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.54x24.12x31.85x47.69x78.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.89x19.84x29.18x44.71x20.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.63x1.85x2.55x4.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.81x13.71x22.01x24.85x12.78x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.11x0.55x4.45x1.46x0.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share18.20x10.45x1.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.94x28.73x49.67x24.97x
AAP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MUSA delivers a 89.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $2 for AAP. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MUSA's 5.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AZO scores 6/9 vs AAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAZO logoAZOAutoZone, Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.ORLY logoORLYO'Reilly Automoti…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.AAP logoAAPAdvance Auto Part…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+89.5%+22.3%+2.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.0%+11.7%+15.9%+7.9%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+34.0%+15.8%+37.2%+14.7%+2.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+39.5%+20.0%+48.2%+17.5%+2.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965664
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage5.22x0.67x2.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12.0B$3.2B$8.3B$56.4B$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$272M$29M$194M$10.7B$3.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12.3B$3.3B$8.5B$67.1B$5.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.49x7.47x14.88x11.85x1.16x
ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — MUSA and WMT and AAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $41,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,460 for AAP. Over the past 12 months, AAP leads with a +85.7% total return vs AZO's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs AAP's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAZO logoAZOAutoZone, Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.ORLY logoORLYO'Reilly Automoti…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.AAP logoAAPAdvance Auto Part…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+7.6%+43.5%+4.7%+15.7%+48.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.1%+15.3%+2.9%+32.7%+85.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+31.2%+106.0%+49.9%+160.5%-52.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+135.9%+318.2%+152.3%+186.9%-65.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+353.6%+803.3%+431.0%+499.5%-52.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.5%+27.2%+14.4%+37.6%-21.8%
Evenly matched — MUSA and WMT and AAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MUSA and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MUSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAP's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs AZO's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAZO logoAZOAutoZone, Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.ORLY logoORLYO'Reilly Automoti…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.AAP logoAAPAdvance Auto Part…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.22x-0.23x0.14x0.12x1.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4388.11$609.82$108.72$134.69$70.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3210.72$345.23$86.77$91.89$30.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.0%+95.3%+87.0%+96.7%+81.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.164.053.455.955.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded172K354K5.2M17.2M1.3M
Evenly matched — MUSA and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WMT and AAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AZO as "Buy", MUSA as "Hold", ORLY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", AAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.2% upside for AZO (target: $4236) vs -13.2% for MUSA (target: $504). For income investors, AAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs MUSA's 0.37%.

MetricAZO logoAZOAutoZone, Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.ORLY logoORLYO'Reilly Automoti…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.AAP logoAAPAdvance Auto Part…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4235.71$504.25$110.80$137.04$58.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts4511476444
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.7%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5370
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.13$0.94$0.99
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.7%+6.0%+2.6%+0.8%0.0%
Evenly matched — WMT and AAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ORLY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AAP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallO'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AZO vs MUSA vs ORLY vs WMT vs AAP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) offers the better valuation at 24. 1x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP?

On trailing P/E, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the cheapest at 24. 1x versus Advance Auto Parts, Inc. at 78. 4x. On forward P/E, Murphy USA Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Murphy USA Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP?

Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) delivered a total return of +318. 2%, compared to -65. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +803. 3% versus AAP's -52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 23β versus Advance Auto Parts, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning AAP is approximately -713% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 5% for Murphy USA Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -5. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advance Auto Parts, Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 1% for AutoZone, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLY leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP?

O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 0. 5% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLY leads at 19. 5% versus 1. 9% for AAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AZO leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 24. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AZO: 19. 2% to $4235. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP?

In this comparison, AAP (1.

7% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield), MUSA (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AZO, ORLY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AZO or MUSA or ORLY or WMT or AAP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 23), +803. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +803. 3%, AAP: -52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AZO and MUSA and ORLY and WMT and AAP?

These companies operate in different sectors (AZO (Consumer Cyclical) and MUSA (Consumer Cyclical) and ORLY (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and AAP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

WMT, AAP pay a dividend while AZO, MUSA, ORLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AZO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUSA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ORLY

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 25%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AZO and MUSA and ORLY and WMT and AAP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AZO: 8.2% · MUSA: 6.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(AZO: 12.8% · MUSA: 2.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AZO: 24.5x · MUSA: 24.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.