Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $15.55B | $11.35B | $6.21B | $4.25B | $8.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.64B | $12.37B | $5.36B | $6.58B | $3.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $937M | $737M | $506M | $283M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | 18.3% | 29.8% | 17.4% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 13.2% | 13.5% | 9.8% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 12.5x | 12.4x | 10.6x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $7.01B | $6.17B | $4.10B | $4.62B | $1.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.21B | $879M | $344M | $1.08B | $402M |
BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball Corporation (BALL) | 100 | 82.0 | -18.0% |
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 154.5 | +54.5% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) | 100 | 112.3 | +12.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BALL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 1.11x
- 11.6% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6%
CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
- PEG 0.82 vs SEE's 9.73
SEE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 0.32, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.91x
- Beta 0.32 vs SLGN's 0.66
- +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7%
SLGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 22.5x)
- 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs ATR's 1.4%
ATR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 10.0% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
- 7.6% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 10.7% vs 8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs SLGN's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs SLGN's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs ATR's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 10.7% vs 8.7% |
BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLGN leads 1 • ATR leads 1 • CCK leads 1 • BALL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BALL is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 3.5x ATR's $3.9B. ATR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, BALL holds the edge at +16.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.6B | $12.4B | $5.4B | $6.6B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $2.1B | $965M | $966M | $801M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $937M | $737M | $506M | $283M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $596M | $1.1B | $459M | $307M | $325M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +18.3% | +29.8% | +17.4% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +13.2% | +13.5% | +9.8% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +6.0% | +9.4% | +4.3% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +8.9% | +8.6% | +4.7% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.2% | +7.7% | +2.1% | +6.5% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | -56.6% | +16.4% | -6.3% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SLGN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 42% valuation discount to ATR's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCK offers better value at 1.05x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.6B | $11.3B | $6.2B | $4.3B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.4B | $16.6B | $10.0B | $7.8B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.70x | 15.85x | 12.29x | 14.91x | 21.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.74x | 12.46x | 12.38x | 10.60x | 22.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.31x | 1.05x | 9.66x | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | 7.96x | 14.33x | 7.97x | 11.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 0.92x | 1.16x | 0.66x | 2.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 3.36x | 5.02x | 1.89x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.74x | 10.34x | 13.54x | 10.07x | 26.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. ATR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs ATR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.2% | +21.8% | +48.4% | +12.5% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +5.2% | +7.1% | +3.0% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +14.1% | +11.2% | +8.7% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +16.0% | +14.1% | +9.9% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 1.77x | 3.31x | 2.03x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.8B | $5.3B | $3.8B | $3.5B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $879M | $344M | $1.1B | $402M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.0B | $6.2B | $4.1B | $4.6B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.99x | 4.00x | 1.95x | 3.36x | 16.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,876 for BALL. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCK at 7.3% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.9% | -2.6% | +2.0% | -1.9% | +2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.9% | +5.3% | +44.2% | -23.7% | -16.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.4% | +23.5% | +2.4% | -11.1% | +7.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.2% | -6.9% | -19.1% | +1.4% | -15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.5% | +98.0% | +4.4% | +80.8% | +83.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.8% | +7.3% | +0.8% | -3.8% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLGN's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 0.48x | 0.32x | 0.66x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.29 | $116.62 | $44.27 | $57.04 | $164.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.83 | $89.21 | $28.15 | $36.15 | $103.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +86.7% | +95.2% | +70.6% | +76.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.7 | 46.9 | 64.0 | 51.1 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 984K | 3.0M | 769K | 473K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLGN and ATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BALL as "Buy", CCK as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", SLGN as "Buy", ATR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.6% upside for ATR (target: $170) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, SLGN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs CCK's 1.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.25 | $120.50 | $43.50 | $50.50 | $169.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 25 | 27 | 21 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.0% | +1.9% | +2.0% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 0 | 21 | 33 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.04 | $0.81 | $0.80 | $1.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.5% | +4.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +4.5% |
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SLGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BALL vs CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs ATR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ball Corporation (BALL) is the stronger pick with 11.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ball Corporation (BALL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus AptarGroup, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Crown Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR?
Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -31. 2% for Ball Corporation (BALL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Silgan Holdings Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning SLGN is approximately 104% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ball Corporation (BALL) is pulling ahead at 11.
6% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for Ball Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR?
AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATR leads at 13. 6% versus 10. 2% for SLGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for AptarGroup, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATR: 35. 6% to $169. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).
09Is BALL or CCK or SEE or SLGN or ATR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, SLGN: +80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BALL and CCK and SEE and SLGN and ATR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BALL (Consumer Cyclical) and CCK (Consumer Cyclical) and SEE (Consumer Cyclical) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical) and ATR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.