Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BANC vs EWBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
BANC vs EWBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $2.99B | $17.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $4.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $229M | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.02B | $3.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.31B | $656M |
BANC vs EWBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banc of California,… (BANC) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 358.3 | +258.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BANC vs EWBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BANC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.8x)
- 2.1% yield, vs EWBC's 1.9%
EWBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 14.3%
- 289.6% 10Y total return vs BANC's 19.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs BANC's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BANC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs BANC's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs EWBC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.8% vs BANC's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BANC's 0.4% |
BANC vs EWBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BANC vs EWBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 2.6x BANC's $1.8B. EWBC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BANC's 12.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $397M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $229M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $235M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.7% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +28.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +32.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +21.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BANC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, EWBC trades at a 20% valuation discount to BANC's 16.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BANC's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EWBC's 9.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $17.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.43x | 13.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.45x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.32x | 9.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 3.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.74x | 11.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for BANC. EWBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BANC's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs BANC's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $709M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $656M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EWBC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $17,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,521 for BANC. Over the past 12 months, EWBC leads with a +47.8% total return vs BANC's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EWBC at 43.4% vs BANC's 25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | +10.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +47.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +194.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | +72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +289.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EWBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EWBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANC's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EWBC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs BANC's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.61 | $127.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.24 | $86.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.7% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BANC and EWBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BANC as "Buy" and EWBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.4% upside for EWBC (target: $131) vs -9.7% for BANC (target: $18). For income investors, BANC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs EWBC's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $130.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $2.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.3% | +0.7% |
EWBC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BANC vs EWBC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BANC or EWBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC). East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BANC or EWBC?
On trailing P/E, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the cheapest at 13. 2x versus Banc of California, Inc. at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, Banc of California, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BANC or EWBC?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +72. 9%, compared to +15. 2% for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +289. 6% versus BANC's +19. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BANC or EWBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Banc of California, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning BANC is approximately 10% more volatile than EWBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 85% for Banc of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BANC or EWBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -3. 3% for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banc of California, Inc. grew EPS 126. 9% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for East West Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BANC or EWBC?
East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 12. 6% for Banc of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EWBC leads at 37. 4% versus 18. 0% for BANC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EWBC leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BANC or EWBC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for East West Bancorp, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EWBC: 4. 4% to $130. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BANC or EWBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 9% for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC).
09Is BANC or EWBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 9% yield, +289. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EWBC: +289. 6%, BANC: +19. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BANC and EWBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.