Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.56B | $1.70B | $29.86B | $5.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209.36B | $1.17B | $5.30B | $2.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.11B | $57M | $104M | $612M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 55.1% | 48.8% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 21.9% |
| Forward P/E | 27.4x | 7.0x | 36.3x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $701M | $847M | $1.08B | $164M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $232M | $682M | $379M |
BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +253.6% vs NICE's -40.4%
FIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 8.7x)
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs BAND's 143.3%
- 13.7% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7%
NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
- 20.8% margin vs TWLO's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 8.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs TWLO's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs NICE's -40.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs TWLO's 1.1%, ROIC 13.2% vs 1.6% |
BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
BAND leads 2 • FIVN leads 0 • TWLO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 178.2x FIVN's $1.2B. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWLO's 2.0%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $209.4B | $1.2B | $5.3B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4.6B | $140M | $415M | $845M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.1B | $57M | $104M | $612M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $206M | $1.0B | $665M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +55.1% | +48.8% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +4.7% | +4.7% | +21.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +4.9% | +2.0% | +20.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +17.6% | +19.0% | +22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1197.2% | +9.2% | +20.0% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.8% | +20.0% | +3.8% | +56.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BAND and FIVN and NICE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.7B | $29.9B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $2.3B | $30.3B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -113.15x | 48.26x | 938.43x | 9.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.36x | 6.96x | 36.33x | 8.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.39x | 16.84x | 77.16x | 6.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.07x | 1.48x | 5.89x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.65x | 2.46x | 4.03x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.02x | 8.45x | 28.91x | 8.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +7.4% | +1.3% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +3.2% | +1.1% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +1.7% | +1.6% | +13.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +2.2% | +1.9% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.75x | 1.08x | 0.14x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $598M | $615M | $399M | -$216M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $232M | $682M | $379M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $701M | $847M | $1.1B | $164M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.30x | 7.94x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,305 for FIVN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs NICE's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs FIVN's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +242.2% | +18.0% | +42.4% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +253.6% | -11.9% | +90.3% | -40.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +330.6% | -61.4% | +259.4% | -49.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | -87.0% | -35.8% | -59.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.3% | +125.4% | +584.5% | +50.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.7% | -27.2% | +53.2% | -20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAND and NICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs NICE's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.79x | 1.51x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.25 | $30.38 | $201.39 | $180.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.57 | $13.29 | $91.84 | $94.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +73.1% | +97.9% | +53.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 90.4 | 68.1 | 78.4 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 670K | 2.8M | 2.2M | 631K |
Analyst Outlook
BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BAND as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", NICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for NICE (target: $151) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $28.40 | $185.17 | $150.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 41 | 52 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +2.9% | +8.5% |
NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
BAND vs FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE?
Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) delivered a total return of -35. 8%, compared to -87. 0% for Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus NICE's +50. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 156% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE?
NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -1. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NICE: 57. 8% to $150. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BAND or FIVN or TWLO or NICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, BAND: +143. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAND and FIVN and TWLO and NICE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAND (Technology) and FIVN (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and NICE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.