Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.76B | $3.09B | $10.28B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $909M | $627M | $3.36B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $238M | $-398M | $537M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 5.8% | 57.1% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.3% | -84.2% | 19.8% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 10.3x | 13.0x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $641M | $4.45B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.55B | $380M | $1.43B | $910M |
BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 297.1 | +197.1% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 1.6%
- 323.2% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 168.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 0.33x
- PEG 1.59 vs BOKF's 4.38
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +44.8% vs BANF's -4.8%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.82 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs BANF's -4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
BANF leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 5.4x SFNC's $627M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $909M | $627M | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $324M | -$497M | $797M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $238M | -$398M | $537M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $196M | $755M | $1.5B | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +5.8% | +57.1% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | -84.2% | +19.8% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | -63.4% | +15.6% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +71.7% | +42.6% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +42.1% | +1.8% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 24% valuation discount to BANF's 17.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 1.81x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $3.1B | $10.3B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $294M | $3.4B | $13.3B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.58x | -7.24x | 16.39x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.48x | 10.35x | 13.05x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.81x | — | 5.51x | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.99x | — | 17.23x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.14x | 4.93x | 3.06x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 0.84x | 1.53x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.75x | 6.88x | 7.19x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | -11.6% | +8.9% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -1.6% | +1.1% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | -9.1% | +4.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | -4.2% | +5.5% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.19x | 0.80x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.5B | $261M | $3.0B | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $380M | $1.4B | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $641M | $4.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | -1.01x | 0.55x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANF five years ago would be worth $16,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs BANF's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOKF at 21.5% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | +14.6% | +13.0% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.8% | +16.7% | +44.8% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.4% | +53.4% | +79.4% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.3% | -15.4% | +59.4% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.2% | +25.2% | +168.5% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.0% | +15.3% | +21.5% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.02x | 1.03x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $138.77 | $22.18 | $139.73 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $101.48 | $17.00 | $91.35 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.6% | +96.3% | +95.5% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 62.3 | 58.9 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 135K | 1.2M | 317K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BANF as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -16.1% for BANF (target: $95). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs BANF's 1.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $95.00 | $22.67 | $131.57 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 9 | 21 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +4.0% | +1.7% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 6 | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.72 | $0.85 | $2.24 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +1.6% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BANF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BANF vs SFNC vs BOKF vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger pick with 12.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus BancFirst Corporation at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BancFirst Corporation wins at 1. 59x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +323. 2% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 26% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is pulling ahead at 12.
3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANF leads at 68. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for BancFirst Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 5% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is BANF or SFNC or BOKF or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 1. 5% yield, +323. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +323. 2%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BANF and SFNC and BOKF and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.