Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Auto - Dealerships
BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $4M | $5M | $539M | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $359K | $95K | $189M | $3.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-66M | $-62M | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | -89.3% | -20.4% | 52.8% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | -91.5% | -303.1% | -33.9% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $685K | $1M | $12M | $170M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $2M | $77M | $1.29B |
BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baosheng Media Grou… (BAOS) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Jumia Technologies … (JMIA) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAOS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.73
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.98x
- Beta 1.73, current ratio 1.98x
- Beta 1.73 vs JMIA's 2.89, lower leverage
KXIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JMIA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.8%, EPS growth 37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.4%
- 12.8% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0%
- +262.5% vs KXIN's -98.8%
CANG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -44.9% 10Y total return vs JMIA's -65.8%
- -5.2% margin vs KXIN's -694.9%
- -2.3% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 4.6% vs -36.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.8% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.2% margin vs KXIN's -694.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs JMIA's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +262.5% vs KXIN's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 4.6% vs -36.0% |
BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories
JMIA leads 1 • BAOS leads 0 • KXIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 36417.5x KXIN's $95,000. CANG is the more profitable business, keeping -5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KXIN's -694.9%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $358,520 | $95,000 | $189M | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$24M | -$56M | $333M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$66M | -$62M | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$3M | -$53M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | -20.4% | +52.8% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -91.5% | -303.1% | -33.9% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -91.7% | -694.9% | -32.6% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -32.4% | -27.8% | -154.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | — | +34.3% | +58.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -140.7% | +88.7% | +46.9% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BAOS and JMIA and CANG each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $5M | $539M | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $4M | $474M | $85M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | -0.10x | -8.53x | 5.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.81x | — | 2.85x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.30x | 20.70x | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CANG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CANG delivers a -4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KXIN. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JMIA's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAOS scores 4/9 vs KXIN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -5.9% | -135.2% | -4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -163.4% | -3.2% | -40.1% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.5% | -36.0% | -33.0% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.5% | -44.5% | -97.8% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.08x | 0.46x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$795,531 | -$1M | -$65M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2M | $77M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,997 | $1M | $12M | $170M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -180.82x | -88.45x | -8.73x | -1.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JMIA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for KXIN. Over the past 12 months, JMIA leads with a +262.5% total return vs KXIN's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JMIA at 44.1% vs KXIN's -96.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -95.0% | -32.2% | -62.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.0% | -98.8% | +262.5% | -73.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.0% | -100.0% | +199.0% | +1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -100.0% | -67.4% | -14.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -100.0% | -65.8% | -44.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.5% | -96.7% | +44.1% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAOS and JMIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAOS is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JMIA's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JMIA currently trades 59.1% from its 52-week high vs KXIN's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 2.11x | 2.89x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.30 | $832.50 | $14.72 | $2.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $4.10 | $2.13 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +0.5% | +59.1% | +18.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 33.0 | 54.0 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 38K | 2.0M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JMIA as "Buy", CANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 99.2% for JMIA (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $17.33 | $3.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% |
CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JMIA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BAOS vs KXIN vs JMIA vs CANG: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) is the stronger pick with 12.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus KXIN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Jumia Technologies AG's 2. 89β — meaning JMIA is approximately 67% more volatile than BAOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 46% for Jumia Technologies AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) is pulling ahead at 12.
8% versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1359. 2% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, JMIA leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -694. 9% for Kaixin Auto Holdings — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -303. 1% for KXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BAOS or KXIN or JMIA or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAOS: -94. 8%, KXIN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BAOS and KXIN and JMIA and CANG?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAOS (Communication Services) and KXIN (Consumer Cyclical) and JMIA (Consumer Cyclical) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BAOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KXIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JMIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.