Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2.62B | $3.15B | $20.83B | $36.50B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $732M | $1.16B | $1.02B | $5.06B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $42M | $449M | $385M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 31.5% | -18.4% | 34.5% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 10.1% | -3.4% | 20.0% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 56.8x | 57.5x | 38.1x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $837M | $1.20B | $0.00 | $4.06B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $112M | $43M | $1.05B | $831M | $9.03B |
BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRK) | 100 | 233.2 | +133.2% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 274.4 | +174.4% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 405.3 | +305.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, BATRK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +83.6% vs NFLX's -23.6%
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- 43.8% margin vs BATRK's -3.2%
- Beta 0.35 vs MSGE's 0.94
- 42.6% ROA vs BATRK's -1.4%
TKO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 418.1%
- 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
- 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- PEG 0.75 vs TKO's 31.98
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 38.1x), PEG 0.75 vs 31.98
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 38.1x), PEG 0.75 vs 31.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs BATRK's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs MSGE's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs BATRK's -1.4% |
BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
BATRK leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • FWONK leads 0 • TKO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FWONK and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 61.7x BATRK's $732M. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BATRK's -3.2%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732M | $1.2B | $1.0B | $5.1B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $245M | $231M | $1.5B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $42M | $449M | $385M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$120M | $289M | $279M | $1.8B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +31.5% | -18.4% | +34.5% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +10.1% | -3.4% | +20.0% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +3.6% | +43.8% | +7.6% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +25.0% | +27.3% | +35.0% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.7% | +59.4% | -2.6% | +25.9% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -109.7% | -123.5% | +100.0% | +62.3% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 60% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs TKO's 69.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $3.2B | $20.8B | $36.5B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $4.3B | $19.8B | $39.7B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -138.32x | 86.64x | — | 82.98x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.83x | 57.49x | 38.12x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 69.62x | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.31x | 23.97x | — | 27.47x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.58x | 3.35x | — | 7.71x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.07x | — | — | 3.93x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.88x | 22.94x | 31.50x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BATRK. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BATRK's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +7.7% | — | +4.1% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +1.8% | +42.6% | +2.5% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +8.5% | — | +6.1% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +11.0% | -0.5% | +7.5% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | — | — | 0.44x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $726M | $1.2B | -$1.1B | $3.2B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $43M | $1.1B | $831M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $837M | $1.2B | $0 | $4.1B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 4.43x | 3.35x | 6.00x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TKO and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $35,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,384 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs FWONK's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | +22.8% | -4.7% | -9.0% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.7% | +83.6% | -0.1% | +12.1% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.0% | +94.8% | +30.5% | +83.0% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.0% | -26.2% | +117.7% | +256.4% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +222.7% | -24.6% | +418.1% | +1060.3% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +24.9% | +9.3% | +22.3% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATRK and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRK currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.94x | 0.35x | 0.64x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.05 | $69.86 | $109.36 | $226.94 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.76 | $35.31 | $80.15 | $152.29 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +95.5% | +85.5% | +82.6% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.9 | 67.6 | 54.6 | 50.5 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 354K | 312K | 2.1M | 1.3M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FWONK and TKO each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BATRK as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", FWONK as "Buy", TKO as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -3.3% for BATRK (target: $50). TKO is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $66.29 | $116.33 | $236.67 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 12 | 24 | 19 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
BATRK vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 31. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) delivered a total return of +256. 4%, compared to -26. 2% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1060% versus MSGE's -24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 166% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 156% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus -3. 2% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TKO leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 31. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Formula One Group — 32. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX?
In this comparison, TKO (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BATRK, MSGE, FWONK, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BATRK or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 8% yield, +1060% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1060%, MSGE: -24. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BATRK and MSGE and FWONK and TKO and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BATRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. TKO pays a dividend while BATRK, MSGE, FWONK, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.