Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BBOT
BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$180M
5Y Perf.-26.1%
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.01B
5Y Perf.+91.7%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+12.8%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.84B
5Y Perf.-3.6%
PTCT
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.11B
5Y Perf.+161.4%

BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BBOT logoBBOT
KRYS logoKRYS
FOLD logoFOLD
ACAD logoACAD
PTCT logoPTCT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$180M$9.01B$4.55B$3.84B$6.11B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$417M$634M$1.10B$827M
Net Income (TTM)$-134M$225M$-27M$376M$-187M
Gross Margin92.8%87.9%91.5%49.7%
Operating Margin42.8%5.2%7.4%-8.3%
Forward P/E39.4x40.6x55.6x9.5x
Total Debt$3M$9M$483M$52M$492M
Cash & Equiv.$374M$496M$214M$178M$985M

BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BBOT
KRYS
FOLD
ACAD
PTCT
StockFeb 24May 26Return
BridgeBio Oncology … (BBOT)10073.9-26.1%
Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS)100191.7+91.7%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100112.8+12.8%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10096.4-3.6%
PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT)100261.4+161.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOLD and PTCT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. PTC Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. KRYS and ACAD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BBOT
BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BBOT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 12.14x
  • Beta 0.96, current ratio 12.14x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

KRYS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 27.7% 10Y total return vs PTCT's 8.5%
  • 53.9% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.

  • beta 0.61
  • Beta 0.61 vs ACAD's 1.11
  • +138.3% vs BBOT's -29.4%
Best for: income & stability
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Niche Pick

ACAD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 26.2% ROA vs BBOT's -41.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -96.3%
Best for: efficiency
PTCT
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
  • 114.5% revenue growth vs BBOT's -80.5%
  • Lower P/E (9.5x vs 55.6x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPTCT logoPTCT114.5% revenue growth vs BBOT's -80.5%
ValuePTCT logoPTCTLower P/E (9.5x vs 55.6x)
Quality / MarginsKRYS logoKRYS53.9% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.61 vs ACAD's 1.11
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+138.3% vs BBOT's -29.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs BBOT's -41.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -96.3%

BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BBOTBridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
PTCTPTC Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration and License Revenue
54.6%$998M
Product
32.1%$587M
Royalty
13.4%$244M

BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKRYSLAGGINGACAD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD and BBOT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBBOT logoBBOTBridgeBio Oncolog…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$417M$634M$1.1B$827M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$166M$185M$40M$96M-$37M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$134M$225M-$27M$376M-$187M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$95M$237M$30M$212M-$169M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+92.8%+87.9%+91.5%+49.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.8%+5.2%+7.4%-8.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+53.9%-4.3%+34.3%-22.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+56.9%+4.7%+19.4%-20.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.9%+23.7%+9.7%-76.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.2%+52.5%-89.0%-81.8%-100.3%
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 79% valuation discount to KRYS's 44.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricBBOT logoBBOTBridgeBio Oncolog…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
Market CapShares × price$180M$9.0B$4.5B$3.8B$6.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$191M$8.5B$4.8B$3.7B$5.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.78x44.69x-164.85x9.78x9.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.39.44x40.62x55.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple50.79x114.88x26.71x6.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue23.16x7.17x3.58x3.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.58x7.51x16.29x3.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF47.71x152.43x36.48x8.70x
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-66 for BBOT. BBOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs FOLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBBOT logoBBOTBridgeBio Oncolog…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-65.5%+19.3%-12.0%+35.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.9%+17.6%-3.2%+26.2%-6.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-96.3%+18.0%+5.3%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.0%+14.8%+5.1%+10.1%+55.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.01x1.76x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$371M-$487M$269M-$126M-$492M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$374M$496M$214M$178M$985M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$9M$483M$52M$492M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.00x-1.67x
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $46,397 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,517 for BBOT. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +138.3% total return vs BBOT's -29.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 51.7% vs BBOT's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBBOT logoBBOTBridgeBio Oncolog…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.7%+23.8%+1.5%-14.3%-4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-29.4%+122.9%+138.3%+32.3%+73.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.8%+248.8%+19.0%+3.9%+32.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.8%+364.0%+54.3%+6.6%+89.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.8%+2773.2%+119.2%-23.4%+852.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-9.1%+51.7%+6.0%+1.3%+9.9%
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACAD's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs BBOT's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBBOT logoBBOTBridgeBio Oncolog…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.96x1.02x0.61x1.11x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.87$306.10$14.50$27.81$87.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.63$122.80$5.51$14.68$39.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.5%+99.9%+99.9%+80.5%+84.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.468.072.253.840.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded301K269K2.9M1.7M1.1M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: BBOT as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 182.9% upside for BBOT (target: $22) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricBBOT logoBBOTBridgeBio Oncolog…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.67$326.20$14.50$34.78$98.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts317243726
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PTCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallKrystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BBOT vs KRYS vs FOLD vs ACAD vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc. (BBOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?

On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 44. 7x. On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?

Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) delivered a total return of +364. 0%, compared to -24. 8% for BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc. (BBOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +27. 7% versus BBOT's -24. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning ACAD is approximately 82% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc. (BBOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1034. 8% for BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?

Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus 0. 0% for BBOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) trades at 39. 4x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBOT: 182. 9% to $21. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BBOT or KRYS or FOLD or ACAD or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, ACAD: -23. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BBOT and KRYS and FOLD and ACAD and PTCT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BBOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BBOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRYS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PTCT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.