Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BBT vs CFG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BBT
Beacon Financial Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.43B
5Y Perf.+166.9%
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$27.70B
5Y Perf.+166.4%

BBT vs CFG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BBT logoBBT
CFG logoCFG
IndustryAsset ManagementBanks - Regional
Market Cap$2.43B$27.70B
Revenue (TTM)$759M$12.35B
Net Income (TTM)$59M$1.70B
Gross Margin51.1%57.6%
Operating Margin16.0%15.3%
Forward P/E8.3x12.4x
Total Debt$879M$12.40B
Cash & Equiv.$2.04B$11.24B

BBT vs CFGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BBT
CFG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Beacon Financial Co… (BBT)100266.9+166.9%
Citizens Financial … (CFG)100266.4+166.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BBT vs CFG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BBT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BBT
Beacon Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

BBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.84
  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 44.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 35.2%, current ratio 0.19x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 257.8% 10Y total return vs BBT's 39.1%
  • NIM 2.6% vs BBT's 2.2%
  • 2.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBBT logoBBT18.0% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3%
ValueBBT logoBBTLower P/E (8.3x vs 12.4x)
Quality / MarginsBBT logoBBTEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBBT logoBBTBeta 0.84 vs CFG's 1.33, lower leverage
DividendsCFG logoCFG2.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CFG logoCFG+73.3% vs BBT's +18.2%
Efficiency (ROA)BBT logoBBTEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFG's 0.4%

BBT vs CFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BBTBeacon Financial Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CFGCitizens Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Service Charges and Fees
53.5%$417M
Card Fees
46.5%$362M

BBT vs CFG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBBTLAGGINGCFG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BBT and CFG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

CFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 16.3x BBT's $759M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (CFG) to 11.9% (BBT).

MetricBBT logoBBTBeacon Financial …CFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$759M$12.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$87M$2.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$59M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$54M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.1%+57.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.0%+15.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.9%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+178.3%+38.2%
Evenly matched — BBT and CFG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 21.2x trailing earnings, CFG trades at a 24% valuation discount to BBT's 28.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBT's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CFG's 12.1x.

MetricBBT logoBBTBeacon Financial …CFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$27.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$28.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.04x21.19x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.30x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.62x12.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.20x2.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.01x1.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.74x
BBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CFG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CFG delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $3 for BBT. BBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFG's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFG scores 7/9 vs BBT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBBT logoBBTBeacon Financial …CFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.0%+3.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.1%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.2B$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.0B$11.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$879M$12.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.25x0.55x
CFG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CFG five years ago would be worth $14,687 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,040 for BBT. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +73.3% total return vs BBT's +18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFG at 39.1% vs BBT's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBBT logoBBTBeacon Financial …CFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%+9.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.2%+73.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.2%+169.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+30.4%+46.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.1%+257.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.5%+39.1%
CFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BBT and CFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFG currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs BBT's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBBT logoBBTBeacon Financial …CFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.84x1.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.83$68.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.81$37.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.0%+93.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.760.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded759K4.5M
Evenly matched — BBT and CFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BBT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BBT as "Hold" and CFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.4% upside for BBT (target: $37) vs 12.8% for CFG (target: $72). CFG is the only dividend payer here at 2.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBBT logoBBTBeacon Financial …CFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.50$72.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts1238
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises53
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.70
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.9%
BBT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CFG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallBeacon Financial Corp. (BBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BBT vs CFG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BBT or CFG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Beacon Financial Corp.

(BBT) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) offers the better valuation at 21. 2x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BBT or CFG?

On trailing P/E, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) is the cheapest at 21. 2x versus Beacon Financial Corp. at 28. 0x. On forward P/E, Beacon Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BBT or CFG?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to +30. 4% for Beacon Financial Corp. (BBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFG returned +257. 8% versus BBT's +39. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BBT or CFG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Beacon Financial Corp.

(BBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning CFG is approximately 58% more volatile than BBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beacon Financial Corp. (BBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 51% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BBT or CFG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beacon Financial Corp.

(BBT) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beacon Financial Corp. grew EPS 44. 1% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BBT or CFG?

Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 11. 9% for Beacon Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBT leads at 16. 0% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CFG leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BBT or CFG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Beacon Financial Corp.

(BBT) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBT: 26. 4% to $36. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BBT or CFG?

In this comparison, CFG (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. BBT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BBT or CFG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 6% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFG: +257. 8%, BBT: +39. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BBT and CFG?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CFG pays a dividend while BBT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CFG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BBT and CFG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BBT: 18.0% · CFG: 1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(BBT: 11.9% · CFG: 12.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BBT: 28.0x · CFG: 21.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.