Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BBW vs FUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
BBW vs FUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $484M | $1.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $526M | $3.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $-1.75B |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | -41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $97M | $5.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $83M |
BBW vs FUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build-A-Bear Worksh… (BBW) | 100 | 1639.4 | +1539.4% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBW vs FUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 2.2%
- 207.5% 10Y total return vs FUN's -37.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 69.7%, current ratio 1.59x
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs BBW's 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs BBW's 2.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.59 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FUN's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs FUN's -44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 26.4% vs 5.1% |
BBW vs FUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBW vs FUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 6.0x BBW's $526M. BBW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, BBW holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $526M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | -$828M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | -41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -55.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BBW's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FUN's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $484M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $553M | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.79x | -8.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.64x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.82x | 11.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.64x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.41x | 37.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBW leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBW delivers a 38.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. BBW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBW scores 5/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.7% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | -22.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.4% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.2% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $69M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $97M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBW five years ago would be worth $52,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,558 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, BBW leads with a +7.7% total return vs FUN's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBW at 21.7% vs FUN's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.6% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.7% | -44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.3% | -48.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +426.1% | -54.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.5% | -37.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.7% | -19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BBW and FUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BBW is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.85 | $38.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.10 | $12.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.1% | +51.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 418K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
BBW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BBW as "Buy" and FUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.1% upside for BBW (target: $70) vs 16.2% for FUN (target: $23). For income investors, BBW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs FUN's 1.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $22.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.5% | 0.0% |
BBW leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BBW vs FUN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBW or FUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW). Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BBW or FUN?
Over the past 5 years, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) delivered a total return of +426. 1%, compared to -54. 4% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBW returned +207. 5% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BBW or FUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 59β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 15% more volatile than BBW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BBW or FUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus 2. 1% for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. grew EPS 4. 1% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BBW or FUN?
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBW leads at 13. 4% versus 11. 5% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BBW or FUN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBW: 88.
1% to $70. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BBW or FUN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 6% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN).
08Is BBW or FUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 2% yield, +207. 5% 10Y return). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBW: +207. 5%, FUN: -37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BBW and FUN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BBW is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.