Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Leisure
Leisure
Leisure
BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Entertainment | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $486M | $664M | $2.32B | $188M | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $526M | $2.11B | $2.90B | $121M | $571M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $300K | $-1.62B | $-13M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | 30.7% | 54.8% | 71.0% | 32.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 7.1% | -44.9% | -6.3% | 2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 82.9x | — | 22.8x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $97M | $3.14B | $5.43B | $24M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $7M | $91M | $38M | $54M |
BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build-A-Bear Worksh… (BBW) | 100 | 1451.2 | +1351.2% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 63.0 | -37.0% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 77.0 | -23.0% |
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 16.9 | -83.1% |
| JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) | 100 | 587.9 | +487.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 203.8% 10Y total return vs FUN's -33.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 69.7%, current ratio 1.59x
- 10.9% margin vs FUN's -56.0%
- Beta 1.59 vs PLAY's 2.24, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, PLAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FUN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.4%, EPS growth -5.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.5%
- 14.4% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4%
PLBY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +54.6% vs PLAY's -50.1%
JAKK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 4.2%
- Beta 1.79, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.82x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 22.8x)
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BBW's 2.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.4% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs FUN's -56.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.59 vs PLAY's 2.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BBW's 2.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.6% vs PLAY's -50.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs FUN's -18.5%, ROIC 26.4% vs -15.1% |
BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BBW leads in 3 of 6 categories
JAKK leads 2 • PLAY leads 0 • FUN leads 0 • PLBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 24.0x PLBY's $121M. BBW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -56.0%. On growth, BBW holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $526M | $2.1B | $2.9B | $121M | $571M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | $405M | -$810M | $684,000 | $24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $300,000 | -$1.6B | -$13M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | -$175M | $29M | -$1M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +30.7% | +54.8% | +71.0% | +32.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +7.1% | -44.9% | -6.3% | +2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +0.0% | -56.0% | -10.5% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -8.3% | +1.0% | -0.8% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -1.1% | -100.0% | -58.1% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -45.2% | -20.5% | +120.8% | +43.4% |
Valuation Metrics
JAKK leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, PLAY trades at a 74% valuation discount to JAKK's 27.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBW's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 34.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $486M | $664M | $2.3B | $188M | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $556M | $3.8B | $7.7B | $174M | $305M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.85x | 7.17x | -1.43x | -12.85x | 27.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.70x | 82.90x | — | 22.78x | 7.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.05x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 8.28x | — | 34.02x | 12.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 0.31x | 0.75x | 1.56x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.67x | 2.87x | 2.94x | 9.22x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.52x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBW delivers a 38.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PLBY. JAKK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 21.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLAY scores 6/9 vs JAKK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.7% | +0.2% | -50.4% | -2.5% | +4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | +0.0% | -18.5% | -4.6% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.4% | +5.1% | -15.1% | -2.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.2% | +6.4% | -17.7% | -1.4% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 21.53x | 6.92x | 1.30x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $69M | $3.1B | $5.3B | -$14M | $39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $7M | $91M | $38M | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $97M | $3.1B | $5.4B | $24M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.06x | -2.60x | -0.39x | 32.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBW five years ago would be worth $53,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $339 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, PLBY leads with a +54.6% total return vs PLAY's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBW at 21.9% vs PLAY's -33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.2% | -38.6% | +46.9% | -9.2% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.4% | -50.1% | -37.0% | +54.6% | +30.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.3% | -70.2% | -41.3% | -8.7% | +4.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +430.9% | -76.7% | -48.0% | -96.6% | +161.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.8% | -71.4% | -33.1% | -83.1% | -66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.9% | -33.2% | -16.3% | -3.0% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BBW and JAKK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BBW is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAKK currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 2.24x | 1.83x | 1.96x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.85 | $35.53 | $38.47 | $2.75 | $24.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.36 | $9.65 | $12.51 | $1.06 | $14.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.4% | +29.5% | +59.1% | +60.7% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 38.3 | 58.0 | 45.9 | 59.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 419K | 1.7M | 1.7M | 775K | 76K |
Analyst Outlook
JAKK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBW as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", FUN as "Buy", PLBY as "Buy", JAKK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 656.3% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs 0.6% for FUN (target: $23). For income investors, JAKK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs BBW's 2.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $20.25 | $22.88 | $12.63 | $41.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 | 29 | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — | — | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | — | — | — | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +26.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
BBW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JAKK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BBW vs PLAY vs FUN vs PLBY vs JAKK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 14.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (82. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK?
On trailing P/E, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
(PLAY) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus JAKKS Pacific, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK?
Over the past 5 years, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) delivered a total return of +430. 9%, compared to -96. 6% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBW returned +203. 8% versus PLBY's -83. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 59β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning PLAY is approximately 40% more volatile than BBW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 22% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 14.
4% versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Playboy, Inc. grew EPS 87. 5% year-over-year, compared to -591. 3% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK?
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -50. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBW leads at 13. 4% versus -43. 7% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 82. 9x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 75. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 656. 3% to $12. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK?
In this comparison, JAKK (4.
2% yield), BBW (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY, FUN, PLBY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BBW or PLAY or FUN or PLBY or JAKK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 2% yield, +203. 8% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBW: +203. 8%, PLAY: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBW and PLAY and FUN and PLBY and JAKK?
These companies operate in different sectors (BBW (Consumer Cyclical) and PLAY (Communication Services) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and PLBY (Consumer Cyclical) and JAKK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BBW is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JAKK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BBW, JAKK pay a dividend while PLAY, FUN, PLBY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.