Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $79.93B | $825.89B | $401.47B | $244.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.82B | $270.79B | $188.75B | $125.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.05B | $58.03B | $30.63B | $21.06B |
| Gross Margin | 108.6% | 58.6% | 55.4% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 27.7% | 18.5% | 18.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 13.8x | 11.9x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $219.94B | $751.15B | $365.90B | $281.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229.75B | $469.32B | $231.84B | $203.36B |
BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays PLC (BCS) | 100 | 411.5 | +311.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 314.8 | +214.8% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 299.1 | +199.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs WFC's 2.02
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.29 vs 2.02
- 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
- +49.0% vs WFC's +10.6%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
- 461.3% 10Y total return vs BCS's 187.7%
- 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 1.00, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 1.00 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage
WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.5% vs BCS's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.29 vs 2.02 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.0% vs WFC's +10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCS's 0.7% |
BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCS leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • BAC leads 1 • WFC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 10.1x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WFC's 15.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.8B | $270.8B | $188.8B | $125.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.0B | $81.3B | $36.6B | $31.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.1B | $58.0B | $30.6B | $21.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$119.7B | $12.6B | -$14.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +108.6% | +58.6% | +55.4% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +27.7% | +18.5% | +18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +21.6% | +16.2% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.1% | -15.5% | +6.7% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.0% | +16.0% | +18.3% | +16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BCS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, BCS trades at a 33% valuation discount to JPM's 15.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCS offers better value at 0.28x vs WFC's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $79.9B | $825.9B | $401.5B | $244.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66.6B | $1.11T | $535.5B | $323.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.44x | 15.51x | 13.81x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.90x | 13.79x | 11.86x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 1.19x | 0.90x | 2.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.66x | 13.34x | 14.63x | 10.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.19x | 3.05x | 2.13x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 2.56x | 1.31x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 31.83x | 80.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for BCS. BAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCS's 2.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +16.1% | +10.1% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +5.4% | +3.2% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +8.2% | +4.2% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.81x | 2.18x | 1.21x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9.8B | $281.8B | $134.1B | $78.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229.8B | $469.3B | $231.8B | $203.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $219.9B | $751.1B | $365.9B | $281.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.42x | 0.74x | 0.44x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCS five years ago would be worth $24,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,630 for BAC. Over the past 12 months, BCS leads with a +49.0% total return vs WFC's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs BAC's 26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | -5.0% | -5.2% | -16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.0% | +25.2% | +31.6% | +10.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +134.6% | +101.6% | +117.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.3% | +104.3% | +36.3% | +83.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.7% | +461.3% | +330.2% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.5% | +32.9% | +26.3% | +29.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCS's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.70 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $97.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.88 | $248.83 | $40.86 | $71.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +90.8% | +91.7% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 59.4 | 59.8 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 8.3M | 36.0M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", WFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs 10.6% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, BCS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs JPM's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $338.78 | $61.13 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 61 | 54 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.7% | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 14 | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $5.13 | $1.27 | $1.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.4% | +3.5% | +5.3% | +9.1% |
BCS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BCS vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). Barclays PLC (BCS) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Barclays PLC (BCS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC?
On trailing P/E, Barclays PLC (BCS) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 5x. On forward P/E, Barclays PLC is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Barclays PLC wins at 0. 29x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC?
Over the past 5 years, Barclays PLC (BCS) delivered a total return of +146.
3%, compared to +36. 3% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +461. 3% versus WFC's +90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Barclays PLC's 1. 39β — meaning BCS is approximately 40% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 3% for Barclays PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to 11. 2% for Wells Fargo & Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC?
Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
7% net margin versus 15. 7% for Wells Fargo & Company — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 18. 5% for BAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Barclays PLC (BCS) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Barclays PLC (BCS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is BCS or JPM or BAC or WFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +461. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +461. 3%, BCS: +187. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCS and JPM and BAC and WFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.