Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $339M | $1.64B | $5.53B | $358.42B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $66M | $0.00 | $61.16B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-219M | $-423M | $-464M | $4.23B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -13.3% | 82.1% | — | 70.2% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -381.6% | -7.2% | — | 26.7% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.3x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $62M | $98K | $69.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $628M | $89M | $714M | $5.23B | $1.98B |
BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bicycle Therapeutic… (BCYC) | 100 | 27.4 | -72.6% |
| Agios Pharmaceutica… (AGIO) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCYC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 105.8%, EPS growth -9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 71.2%
- 105.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
AGIO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 11.46x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 11.46x
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +96.1% vs BCYC's -37.1%
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- Beta 0.34 vs BCYC's 1.65
- 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 14.3x)
- 8.3% margin vs AGIO's -6.4%
- 4.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 105.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs AGIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs BCYC's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +96.1% vs BCYC's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • BCYC leads 0 • AGIO leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGIO's -6.4%. On growth, AGIO holds the edge at +137.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $66M | $0 | $61.2B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$238M | -$470M | -$487M | $24.5B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$219M | -$423M | -$464M | $4.2B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$229M | -$385M | -$423M | $18.7B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -13.3% | +82.1% | — | +70.2% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -7.2% | — | +26.7% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -6.4% | — | +6.9% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -5.8% | — | +30.6% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.1% | +137.7% | — | +10.0% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -9.0% | +19.7% | +57.4% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 73% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $339M | $1.6B | $5.5B | $358.4B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$272M | $1.6B | $4.8B | $422.3B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.55x | -3.87x | -9.97x | 85.50x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.28x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 14.96x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.67x | 30.30x | — | 5.86x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 1.34x | 5.83x | — | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 20.12x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.7% | -34.1% | -47.1% | +62.1% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.5% | -31.7% | -44.1% | +3.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -26.3% | — | +23.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.0% | -33.8% | -66.1% | +21.5% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.05x | 0.00x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$611M | -$27M | -$714M | $63.8B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $628M | $89M | $714M | $5.2B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $62M | $98,000 | $69.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1465.53x | — | — | 3.28x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,540 for BCYC. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +96.1% total return vs BCYC's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs BCYC's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.8% | +1.3% | +5.1% | -10.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.1% | -2.4% | +96.1% | +11.3% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.4% | +8.3% | +40.9% | +50.4% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | -50.7% | +62.4% | +101.3% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | -42.2% | +173.6% | +295.5% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.1% | +2.7% | +12.1% | +14.6% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCYC's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs BCYC's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.12x | 1.37x | 0.34x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.36 | $46.00 | $30.09 | $244.81 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.24 | $22.24 | $13.36 | $176.57 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.2% | +59.8% | +90.5% | +82.8% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 41.9 | 60.2 | 46.8 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 464K | 1.0M | 1.4M | 5.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCYC as "Buy", AGIO as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.2% upside for BCYC (target: $11) vs 26.3% for IQV (target: $226). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.67 | $37.75 | $45.50 | $256.64 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 29 | 23 | 41 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 13 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.57 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +4.1% |
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BCYC vs AGIO vs IMVT vs ABBV vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) is the stronger pick with 105.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -84. 6% for Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus BCYC's -59. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Bicycle Therapeutics plc's 1. 65β — meaning BCYC is approximately 389% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) is pulling ahead at 105.
8% versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IQVIA Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -161. 2% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCYC leads at 71. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -764. 0% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -873. 9% for AGIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCYC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for AbbVie Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCYC: 118. 2% to $10. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BCYC, AGIO, IMVT, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BCYC or AGIO or IMVT or ABBV or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, BCYC: -59. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCYC and AGIO and IMVT and ABBV and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCYC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while BCYC, AGIO, IMVT, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.