Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Regulated Gas
Agricultural - Machinery
BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Regulated Gas | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $17.07B | $416.75B | $157.32B | $4.70B | $13.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.01B | $70.75B | $45.88B | $3.63B | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $417M | $9.42B | $4.08B | $-753M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 63.5% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 25.2% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 61.2% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 38.8x | 32.5x | — | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $64.50B | $43.33B | $63.94B | $13.27B | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.20B | $9.98B | $8.28B | $430M | $3.23B |
BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIPC) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 176.3 | +76.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- PEG 0.92 vs DE's 1.99
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.48x
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.7%
- 13.3% margin vs BIPC's -20.7%
- +181.5% vs CNH's -9.1%
- 10.0% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 15.9% vs 12.0%
DE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54
Among these 5 stocks, BIPC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% revenue growth vs CNH's -8.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs BIPC's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs CNH's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs CNH's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 15.9% vs 12.0% |
BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
BIP leads 2 • DE leads 0 • BIPC leads 0 • CNH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 19.5x BIPC's $3.6B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIPC's -20.7%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.0B | $70.8B | $45.9B | $3.6B | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.2B | $14.0B | $9.5B | $2.9B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $417M | $9.4B | $4.1B | -$753M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13.7B | $11.4B | $5.5B | -$556M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +63.5% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +16.6% | +17.0% | +61.2% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +13.3% | +8.9% | -20.7% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.2% | +16.2% | +12.0% | -15.3% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | +22.2% | +16.3% | -5.9% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | +30.2% | -24.1% | -125.4% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BIP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, CNH trades at a 44% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIP offers better value at 1.12x vs DE's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.1B | $416.8B | $157.3B | $4.7B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78.4B | $450.1B | $213.0B | $17.5B | $37.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.69x | 47.57x | 31.37x | -19.00x | 26.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.91x | 38.79x | 32.53x | — | 26.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.12x | 1.69x | 1.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.98x | 33.41x | 20.01x | 5.90x | 10.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 1.26x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 2.33x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 40.56x | 48.69x | 21.47x | 6.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-36 for BIPC. BIP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIPC's 6.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIP scores 8/9 vs BIPC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +47.5% | +15.5% | -36.2% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +10.0% | +3.9% | -3.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +12.0% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +14.2% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 6.63x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61.3B | $33.4B | $55.7B | $12.8B | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $10.0B | $8.3B | $430M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $64.5B | $43.3B | $63.9B | $13.3B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.81x | 9.22x | 2.74x | 1.92x | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,270 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs CNH's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs CNH's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +50.2% | +24.7% | -12.6% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +5.8% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.8% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +0.2% | -19.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | +282.5% | +54.1% | -4.7% | -27.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.1% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +122.4% | +87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.6% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +0.1% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs BIPC's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 0.62x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $51.72 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.63 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $34.18 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +75.7% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 47.3 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 2.4M | 1.2M | 1.1M | 15.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIP as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", BIPC as "Buy", CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.6% upside for BIPC (target: $57) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.26% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.20 | $824.80 | $680.54 | $57.00 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 53 | 46 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.3% | +0.7% | +1.1% | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.79 | $5.86 | $6.33 | — | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BIP vs CAT vs DE vs BIPC vs CNH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the stronger pick with 9. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (26. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH?
On trailing P/E, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, CNH Industrial N. V. is actually cheaper at 26. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. wins at 0. 92x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to -27. 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus CNH's +87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 173% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 182% versus 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is pulling ahead at 9. 8% versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIPC leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -6. 6% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPC leads at 61. 5% versus 15. 4% for CNH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIPC leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) trades at 26. 1x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIPC: 45. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH?
In this comparison, BIP (10.
3% yield), CNH (2. 5% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BIPC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIP or CAT or DE or BIPC or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, BIPC: +122. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIP and CAT and DE and BIPC and CNH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BIP (Utilities) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and BIPC (Utilities) and CNH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BIP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BIPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BIP, CAT, DE, CNH pay a dividend while BIPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.