Travel Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $132.72B | $84.21B | $29.58B | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.69B | $12.65B | $15.17B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.15B | $2.52B | $1.56B | $19M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 82.9% | 88.8% | 66.2% |
| Operating Margin | 34.3% | 20.5% | 14.7% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 28.3x | 13.0x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $19.29B | $2.07B | $6.67B | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.20B | $6.56B | $6.98B | $1.03B |
BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs EXPE's 130.6%
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
ABNB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 25.2%, current ratio 1.38x
EXPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +52.8% vs TRIP's -21.8%
TRIP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 13.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs TRIP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs TRIP's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs TRIP's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EXPE's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs TRIP's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7% |
BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRIP leads 1 • ABNB leads 1 • EXPE leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 14.8x TRIP's $1.9B. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.7B | $12.6B | $15.2B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.2B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.2B | $2.5B | $1.6B | $19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.0B | $4.5B | $4.9B | $198M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +82.9% | +88.8% | +66.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +20.5% | +14.7% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +19.9% | +10.3% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +36.0% | +32.1% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.2% | +17.9% | +14.7% | -3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +4.0% | +96.8% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TRIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, EXPE trades at a 29% valuation discount to TRIP's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRIP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $132.7B | $84.2B | $29.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $134.8B | $79.7B | $29.3B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.87x | 34.85x | 25.77x | 36.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.32x | 28.35x | 13.02x | 7.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.41x | 31.33x | 10.22x | 8.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.93x | 6.88x | 2.01x | 0.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.67x | 13.10x | 2.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.61x | 18.12x | 9.51x | 8.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +31.2% | +68.7% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.1% | +10.2% | +6.0% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +50.6% | +40.2% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +75.4% | +26.3% | +23.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 2.62x | 1.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | -$4.5B | -$307M | $202M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $6.6B | $7.0B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.3B | $2.1B | $6.7B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.21x | — | 16.35x | 4.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,762 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs TRIP's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | +5.6% | -10.5% | -23.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.8% | +14.1% | +52.8% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.4% | +11.8% | +175.6% | -30.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.6% | -7.1% | +46.9% | -74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.7% | -2.9% | +130.6% | -76.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +3.8% | +40.2% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKNG and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.33x | 1.47x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5129.83 | $147.25 | $303.80 | $20.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $150.62 | $110.81 | $148.55 | $9.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.3% | +95.4% | +83.2% | +55.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 56.2 | 50.2 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 3.5M | 1.9M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BKNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKNG as "Buy", ABNB as "Hold", EXPE as "Hold", TRIP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for BKNG (target: $232) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). For income investors, BKNG offers the higher dividend yield at 0.89% vs EXPE's 0.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $231.72 | $145.44 | $272.35 | $13.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 71 | 44 | 75 | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.53 | — | $1.52 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.9% | +4.5% | +6.5% | +39.9% |
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TRIP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BKNG vs ABNB vs EXPE vs TRIP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP?
On trailing P/E, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Tripadvisor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +87. 6%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 156% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Booking Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKNG leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tripadvisor, Inc.
(TRIP) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Airbnb, Inc. — 20. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKNG: 35. 3% to $231. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield), EXPE (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ABNB, TRIP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BKNG or ABNB or EXPE or TRIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKNG and ABNB and EXPE and TRIP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BKNG, EXPE pay a dividend while ABNB, TRIP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.