Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Education & Training Services
BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1.86B | $6.12B | $2.50B | $5.93B | $1.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $717M | $995M | $871M | $1.73B | $774M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $152M | $180M | $258M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | 75.3% | 63.2% | 85.0% | 69.3% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 17.1% | 1.8% | 21.3% | -11.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 25.0x | 15.9x | 14.0x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $940M | $71M | $67M | $218M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $390M | $107M | $632M | $398M | $793M |
BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackLine, Inc. (BL) | 100 | 26.4 | -73.6% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 141.3 | +41.3% |
| Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
| Coursera, Inc. (COUR) | 100 | 19.8 | -80.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 14.0x)
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs PCTY's 218.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.20x
FRSH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 20.7% margin vs COUR's -8.2%
PCTY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 0.43
- Beta 0.43 vs FRSH's 1.15
Among these 5 stocks, COUR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs BL's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs COUR's -8.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs FRSH's 1.15 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.7% vs PCTY's -40.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs COUR's -6.4% |
BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRSH leads in 1 of 6 categories
COUR leads 1 • APPF leads 1 • BL leads 0 • PCTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRSH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.4x BL's $717M. FRSH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COUR's -8.2%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $717M | $995M | $871M | $1.7B | $774M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $192M | $41M | $394M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $152M | $180M | $258M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | $234M | $254M | $470M | $84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.3% | +63.2% | +85.0% | +69.3% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +17.1% | +1.8% | +21.3% | -11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +15.3% | +20.7% | +14.9% | -8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +23.5% | +29.2% | +27.2% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +20.4% | +16.5% | +10.5% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.2% | +37.2% | — | +26.7% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
COUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, FRSH trades at a 82% valuation discount to BL's 79.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCTY's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPF's 34.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $6.1B | $2.5B | $5.9B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $6.1B | $1.9B | $5.8B | $274M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.92x | 43.83x | 14.33x | 27.14x | -20.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.95x | 24.99x | 15.87x | 14.05x | 15.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.96x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.11x | 34.66x | 27.13x | 14.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.65x | 6.44x | 2.98x | 3.72x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.01x | 11.39x | 2.57x | 5.00x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.50x | 25.62x | 10.18x | 17.31x | 9.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — APPF and PCTY and COUR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-10 for COUR. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BL's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs APPF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +30.9% | +18.5% | +22.4% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +24.2% | +11.9% | +4.9% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +22.4% | +2.0% | +26.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +25.9% | +1.2% | +23.3% | -12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.53x | 0.13x | 0.06x | 0.18x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $550M | -$36M | -$566M | -$180M | -$788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $390M | $107M | $632M | $398M | $793M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $940M | $71M | $67M | $218M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.69x | — | — | 23.29x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,735 for COUR. Over the past 12 months, APPF leads with a -20.7% total return vs PCTY's -40.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 7.3% vs COUR's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.0% | -26.2% | -22.2% | -25.1% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.5% | -20.7% | -36.5% | -40.6% | -28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | +23.4% | -33.0% | -37.1% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +30.6% | -81.0% | -35.2% | -82.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.5% | +1277.1% | -81.0% | +218.2% | -86.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.1% | +7.3% | -12.5% | -14.3% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRSH and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRSH's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRSH currently trades 55.9% from its 52-week high vs COUR's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.71x | 1.15x | 0.43x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.57 | $326.04 | $16.14 | $201.97 | $13.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.78 | $142.72 | $6.79 | $92.99 | $5.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.3% | +52.2% | +55.9% | +54.0% | +46.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 53.2 | 57.4 | 45.7 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 349K | 7.8M | 733K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BL as "Hold", APPF as "Buy", FRSH as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", COUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for PCTY (target: $168) vs 24.2% for COUR (target: $8).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $236.67 | $11.43 | $168.08 | $7.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 13 | 18 | 41 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.7% | +3.1% | +15.5% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
FRSH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). COUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BL vs APPF vs FRSH vs PCTY vs COUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for BlackLine, Inc. (BL). Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR?
On trailing P/E, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus BlackLine, Inc. at 79. 9x. On forward P/E, BlackLine, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -82. 7% for Coursera, Inc. (COUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus COUR's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Freshworks Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning FRSH is approximately 169% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for BlackLine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 7. 2% for BlackLine, Inc. (BL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshworks Inc. grew EPS 296. 9% year-over-year, compared to -73. 1% for BlackLine, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR?
Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus -6. 7% for Coursera, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCTY leads at 19. 1% versus -10. 3% for COUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSH leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BlackLine, Inc.
(BL) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for AppFolio, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCTY: 54. 0% to $168. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BL or APPF or FRSH or PCTY or COUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, FRSH: -81. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BL and APPF and FRSH and PCTY and COUR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BL (Technology) and APPF (Technology) and FRSH (Technology) and PCTY (Technology) and COUR (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.