Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Agricultural - Machinery
Auto - Parts
Agricultural - Machinery
BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $2.24B | $4.06B | $317M | $3.72B | $60.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.49B | $9.93B | $1.47B | $2.15B | $27.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $300M | $-65M | $190M | $2.48B |
| Gross Margin | 21.0% | 14.0% | 2.0% | 40.7% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 4.5% | -3.1% | 15.6% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 18.5x | 1.5x | 15.0x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $90M | $923M | $443M | $633M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $587M | $32M | $49M | $9.25B |
BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Bird Corporati… (BLBD) | 100 | 493.7 | +393.7% |
| Thor Industries, In… (THO) | 100 | 89.2 | -10.8% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
| Dorman Products, In… (DORM) | 100 | 178.1 | +78.1% |
| PACCAR Inc (PCAR) | 100 | 231.6 | +131.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 22.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs PCAR's 269.8%
- PEG 0.24 vs THO's 4.97
- 9.9% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
Among these 5 stocks, THO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.93, yield 4.2%
- 4.2% yield, vs THO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
DORM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 42.9%, current ratio 3.09x
- Beta 0.85, current ratio 3.09x
- Beta 0.85 vs WNC's 1.93, lower leverage
PCAR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 9.1% margin vs WNC's -4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 19.9x), PEG 0.24 vs 1.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs WNC's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs WNC's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs THO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.7% vs WNC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.0% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 102.6% vs 37.4% |
BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLBD leads in 2 of 6 categories
WNC leads 1 • THO leads 0 • DORM leads 0 • PCAR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — THO and DORM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.2B annually — 18.6x WNC's $1.5B. PCAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNC's -4.4%. On growth, THO holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $9.9B | $1.5B | $2.2B | $27.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | $714M | -$2M | $377M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $300M | -$65M | $190M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $197M | $228M | -$38M | $71M | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +14.0% | +2.0% | +40.7% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +4.5% | -3.1% | +15.6% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +3.0% | -4.4% | +8.8% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +2.3% | -2.6% | +3.3% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | +5.3% | -20.4% | +4.2% | -16.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +35.0% | -120.7% | -23.5% | +19.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 94% valuation discount to PCAR's 25.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BLBD offers better value at 0.29x vs THO's 4.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $4.1B | $317M | $3.7B | $60.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $4.4B | $728M | $4.3B | $50.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.26x | 15.89x | 1.54x | 18.75x | 25.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.59x | 18.54x | — | 15.05x | 19.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | 4.26x | — | 1.25x | 2.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.49x | 6.38x | 1.92x | 10.41x | 13.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 0.42x | 0.21x | 1.75x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.12x | 0.96x | 0.88x | 2.59x | 3.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.59x | 8.93x | — | 49.18x | 19.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLBD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLBD delivers a 50.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WNC. THO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WNC's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLBD scores 7/9 vs PCAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.8% | +7.0% | -17.3% | +13.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.0% | +4.3% | -5.0% | +7.6% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +102.6% | +6.7% | +37.4% | +13.9% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +49.4% | +7.6% | +32.6% | +18.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.22x | 1.20x | 0.43x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | $336M | $411M | $584M | -$9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $587M | $32M | $49M | $9.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $90M | $923M | $443M | $633M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 394.69x | 9.82x | -0.97x | 8.24x | 129.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLBD five years ago would be worth $26,732 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,154 for WNC. Over the past 12 months, BLBD leads with a +87.7% total return vs WNC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLBD at 53.1% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.5% | -26.1% | -11.0% | +0.3% | +2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.7% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +0.5% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +258.7% | +0.3% | -63.9% | +41.6% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.3% | -40.8% | -48.5% | +19.2% | +105.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +557.8% | +43.7% | -22.6% | +129.7% | +269.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.1% | +0.1% | -28.8% | +12.3% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BLBD and DORM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DORM is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLBD currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs WNC's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.23x | 1.93x | 0.85x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.51 | $122.83 | $12.94 | $166.89 | $131.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.01 | $73.29 | $7.10 | $98.44 | $88.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +62.6% | +60.3% | +74.6% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 44.1 | 37.7 | 71.2 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 357K | 768K | 598K | 273K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — THO and WNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLBD as "Buy", THO as "Hold", WNC as "Hold", DORM as "Buy", PCAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -1.7% for BLBD (target: $70). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs THO's 2.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.67 | $114.25 | $17.50 | $140.00 | $124.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 41 | 18 | 16 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +4.2% | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 | $0.33 | — | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +1.3% | +10.6% | +1.1% | +0.1% |
BLBD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BLBD vs THO vs WNC vs DORM vs PCAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the stronger pick with 9.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus PACCAR Inc at 25. 3x. On forward P/E, Dorman Products, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blue Bird Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus Thor Industries, Inc. 's 4. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR?
Over the past 5 years, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) delivered a total return of +167.
3%, compared to -48. 5% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLBD returned +557. 8% versus WNC's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 126% more volatile than DORM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 120% for Wabash National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is pulling ahead at 9.
9% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -42. 9% for PACCAR Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLBD leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus 2. 7% for Thor Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus 4. 4% for THO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DORM leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Thor Industries, Inc. 's 4. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for PACCAR Inc — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), PCAR (3. 8% yield), THO (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. BLBD, DORM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLBD or THO or WNC or DORM or PCAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01), 3. 8% yield, +269. 8% 10Y return). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCAR: +269. 8%, WNC: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLBD and THO and WNC and DORM and PCAR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLBD (Consumer Cyclical) and THO (Consumer Cyclical) and WNC (Industrials) and DORM (Consumer Cyclical) and PCAR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLBD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; THO is a small-cap deep-value stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; DORM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCAR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. THO, WNC, PCAR pay a dividend while BLBD, DORM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.