Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $275M | $513M | $2.38B | $1.08B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $97M | $344M | $867M | $656M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $32M | $169M | $71M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | 44.1% | 72.1% | 54.5% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | 9.0% | 25.3% | 14.1% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x | 10.9x | 9.9x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $324M | $1.26B | $327M | $1.63B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $167M | $185M | $135M | $599M |
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) | 100 | 106.9 | +6.9% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 62.8 | -37.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 92.6 | -7.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLFY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth 7.3%
- 11.2% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 5.4%
- Beta 0.82, yield 5.4%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +35.0% vs FIS's -42.1%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 104.0% 10Y total return vs OCFC's 45.0%
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
Among these 5 stocks, OCFC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.28 vs OCFC's 3.55
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.28 vs 1.55
- 22.9% margin vs BLFY's -10.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.2% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.28 vs 1.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs BLFY's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BLFY's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.0% vs FIS's -42.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs BLFY's -0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -1.1% |
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • BLFY leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 120.2x BLFY's $97M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLFY's -10.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $97M | $344M | $867M | $656M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $43M | $241M | $103M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $32M | $169M | $71M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $40M | $225M | $80M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +44.1% | +72.1% | +54.5% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +9.0% | +25.3% | +14.1% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +7.6% | +19.5% | +10.8% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +6.2% | +25.2% | +12.1% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.2% | +50.0% | +39.5% | -36.1% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.95x vs OCFC's 5.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $275M | $513M | $2.4B | $1.1B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $597M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.07x | 19.43x | 13.69x | 16.07x | 58.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.06x | 10.94x | 9.89x | 6.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.95x | 5.78x | 2.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.66x | 10.46x | 27.65x | 7.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.15x | 1.49x | 2.74x | 1.65x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 0.69x | 1.22x | 0.65x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.84x | 23.99x | 10.87x | 13.57x | 8.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BLFY. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNY scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +4.3% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +0.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.1% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +2.2% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +2.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 1.68x | 0.17x | 0.98x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $271M | $1.1B | $142M | $1.5B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $167M | $185M | $135M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $324M | $1.3B | $327M | $1.6B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.21x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.33x | 15.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $13,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,487 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +35.0% total return vs FIS's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 15.9% vs FIS's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +14.0% | +10.5% | +7.6% | -33.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.5% | +35.0% | +8.6% | +17.4% | -42.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +33.8% | +55.7% | +55.1% | -13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | -19.6% | +33.5% | +2.1% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | -8.4% | +104.0% | +45.0% | -18.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +10.2% | +15.9% | +15.8% | -4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLFY's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.82x | 0.88x | 1.03x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.74 | $8.50 | $46.92 | $20.61 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.61 | $5.76 | $39.20 | $16.09 | $43.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +96.0% | +97.2% | +91.2% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 54.5 | 56.2 | 51.3 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 274K | 301K | 237K | 662K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLFY as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -9.4% for BLFY (target: $12). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs NBTB's 3.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $9.50 | $46.00 | $19.67 | $67.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% | +3.1% | +4.5% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 | $1.43 | $0.84 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +7.6% | +6.3% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BLFY vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) is the stronger pick with 11.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +33. 5%, compared to -65. 1% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +104. 0% versus FIS's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Blue Foundry Bancorp's 1. 36β — meaning BLFY is approximately 110% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) is pulling ahead at 11.
2% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -10. 3% for Blue Foundry Bancorp — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -10. 3% for BLFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
4% yield), OCFC (4. 5% yield), FIS (3. 8% yield), NBTB (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BLFY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLFY or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -18. 4%, BLFY: +2. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLFY and KRNY and NBTB and OCFC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLFY (Financial Services) and KRNY (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and OCFC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. KRNY, NBTB, OCFC, FIS pay a dividend while BLFY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.