Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $421M | $828M | $2.76B | $2.22B | $7.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $177M | $266M | $643M | $819M | $3.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $48M | $209M | $195M | $550M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 72.6% | 79.9% | 79.0% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 25.4% | 43.8% | 29.5% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 13.3x | 14.1x | 10.5x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $40M | $991M | $373M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $22M | $108M | $183M | $511M |
BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Marin Banco… (BMRC) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Heritage Commerce C… (HTBK) | 100 | 153.5 | +53.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 123.3 | +23.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 51.8%, EPS growth 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 473.15x
- Beta 0.94, yield 3.9%, current ratio 473.15x
- 51.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
HTBK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +51.6% vs BANR's +7.1%
CVBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 4.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COLB's 3.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5%
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 101.4% 10Y total return vs HTBK's 75.1%
- PEG 0.91 vs CVBF's 4.44
- NIM 3.6% vs BMRC's 2.8%
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.91 vs 4.44
Among these 5 stocks, COLB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.91 vs 4.44 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs COLB's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COLB's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.6% vs BANR's +7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5% |
BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories
BMRC leads 1 • HTBK leads 1 • BANR leads 0 • COLB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 18.2x BMRC's $177M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $177M | $266M | $643M | $819M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71M | $71M | $294M | $253M | $895M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $48M | $209M | $195M | $550M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $61M | $217M | $248M | $724M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +72.6% | +79.9% | +79.0% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +25.4% | +43.8% | +29.5% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +18.0% | +32.5% | +23.8% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +22.8% | +33.8% | +30.3% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.7% | +47.1% | +11.1% | +11.2% | +5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BMRC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, BMRC trades at a 45% valuation discount to HTBK's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs CVBF's 4.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $421M | $828M | $2.8B | $2.2B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $847M | $3.6B | $2.4B | $10.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.57x | 17.24x | 13.38x | 11.64x | 13.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.94x | 13.32x | 14.12x | 10.51x | 9.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.27x | 3.00x | 4.21x | 1.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.93x | 11.89x | 12.93x | 9.56x | 11.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 3.11x | 4.29x | 2.71x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.17x | 1.20x | 1.16x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.40x | 13.63x | 12.70x | 8.97x | 10.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BMRC and HTBK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRC delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTBK. HTBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLB's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTBK scores 8/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +6.8% | +9.3% | +10.3% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +6.9% | +6.8% | +7.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +3.1% | +9.3% | +10.1% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.06x | 0.43x | 0.19x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$156M | $18M | $883M | $190M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $22M | $108M | $183M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $40M | $991M | $373M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.02x | 0.95x | 2.12x | 1.11x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTBK five years ago would be worth $13,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,419 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, HTBK leads with a +51.6% total return vs BANR's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTBK at 29.3% vs BANR's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.2% | +13.7% | +10.0% | +6.8% | +7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.3% | +51.6% | +9.7% | +7.1% | +31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.1% | +116.3% | +92.5% | +61.0% | +77.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | +32.4% | +12.8% | +31.1% | -15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.7% | +75.1% | +66.5% | +101.4% | +52.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.2% | +29.3% | +24.4% | +17.2% | +21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTBK and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTBK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs BMRC's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.03x | 0.92x | 0.79x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.48 | $13.83 | $21.48 | $69.83 | $32.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.25 | $8.92 | $17.95 | $57.05 | $21.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +97.3% | +94.6% | +94.0% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 56.5 | 55.5 | 54.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 739K | 1.6M | 288K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BMRC as "Hold", HTBK as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", COLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 6.6% for BANR (target: $70). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.02% vs BANR's 2.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.25 | $14.50 | $24.75 | $70.00 | $32.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 12 | 16 | 13 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +3.8% | +4.0% | +3.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | $0.52 | $0.82 | $1.96 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.5% | +2.9% | +1.6% | +1.5% |
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BMRC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BMRC vs HTBK vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is the stronger pick with 51.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
On trailing P/E, Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Heritage Commerce Corp at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 91x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) delivered a total return of +32.
4%, compared to -15. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +101. 4% versus BMRC's +41. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning COLB is approximately 72% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 51% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is pulling ahead at 51.
8% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of Marin Bancorp grew EPS 625. 0% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 17. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 23. 4% for COLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 21. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 0% for Banner Corporation (BANR).
09Is BMRC or HTBK or CVBF or BANR or COLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 0% yield, +101. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 4%, COLB: +52. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BMRC and HTBK and CVBF and BANR and COLB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BMRC is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.