Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Renewable Utilities
Financial - Capital Markets
Electrical Equipment & Parts
BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Software - Infrastructure | Renewable Utilities | Financial - Capital Markets | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $170K | $74M | $716M | $19M | $23M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $387K | $153M | $217M | $60M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $144M | $-115M | $-2M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | -5.3% | 36.3% | 22.1% | 79.7% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | -30.4% | -35.1% | -35.8% | -19.2% | -1.9% |
| Total Debt | $6M | $369M | $95M | $68M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $49M | $58M | $9M | $1M |
BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brenmiller Energy L… (BNRG) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BNRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.75
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 1.75, current ratio 1.33x
- 8.4% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 94.2% margin vs BNRG's -32.7%
- 43.2% ROA vs BNRG's -119.0%, ROIC -57.1% vs -199.0%
NRGV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- -57.1% 10Y total return vs FLUX's -69.0%
- +447.1% vs BNRG's -98.8%
GREE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, FLUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs BNRG's -32.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.75 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs BNRG's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs BNRG's -119.0%, ROIC -57.1% vs -199.0% |
BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STEM leads in 1 of 6 categories
NRGV leads 1 • BNRG leads 0 • GREE leads 0 • FLUX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STEM and GREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRGV is the larger business by revenue, generating $217M annually — 560.8x BNRG's $387,000. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BNRG's -32.7%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $387,000 | $153M | $217M | $60M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$16M | -$72M | $4M | -$212,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $144M | -$115M | -$2M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$8M | -$98M | -$20M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +36.3% | +22.1% | +79.7% | +32.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.4% | -35.1% | -35.8% | -19.2% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.7% | +94.2% | -53.0% | -33.2% | -12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.9% | -5.5% | -45.2% | -37.7% | -14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.8% | +156.4% | — | -60.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | +27.2% | -42.9% | +2.3% | -25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BNRG and NRGV and GREE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $170,073 | $74M | $716M | $19M | $23M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $394M | $752M | $79M | $37M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.95x | -6.37x | -0.65x | -3.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 38.86x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 0.48x | 3.52x | 0.32x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | — | 7.50x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.82x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STEM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NRGV delivers a -146.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-147 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FLUX. NRGV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BNRG's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STEM scores 6/9 vs GREE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | — | -146.8% | — | -7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.0% | +43.2% | -40.3% | -3.2% | -21.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -199.0% | -57.1% | -49.5% | -57.2% | -30.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -155.5% | -23.9% | -53.7% | -23.9% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.67x | — | 1.07x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $897,999 | $320M | $36M | $59M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $49M | $58M | $9M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $369M | $95M | $68M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.58x | 14.43x | -10.33x | 0.70x | -2.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRGV five years ago would be worth $4,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for BNRG. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs BNRG's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs BNRG's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -87.6% | -48.6% | -15.3% | -25.6% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.8% | -16.2% | +447.1% | +29.0% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -89.5% | +140.7% | -71.0% | -66.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.8% | -57.7% | -99.2% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -95.5% | -57.1% | -62.9% | -69.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.5% | -52.9% | +34.0% | -33.8% | -30.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BNRG and NRGV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BNRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRGV currently trades 65.2% from its 52-week high vs BNRG's 1.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.75x | 3.66x | 3.08x | 3.33x | 2.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.75 | $32.23 | $6.35 | $2.42 | $7.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $5.93 | $0.65 | $0.87 | $0.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.1% | +27.0% | +65.2% | +50.4% | +17.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 51.2 | 53.3 | 52.9 | 57.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 225K | 155K | 3.7M | 138K | 114K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STEM as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 137.2% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.67 | $2.75 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 7 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
STEM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NRGV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BNRG vs STEM vs NRGV vs GREE vs FLUX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Brenmiller Energy Ltd (BNRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRGV returned -57. 1% versus BNRG's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brenmiller Energy Ltd (BNRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
75β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 109% more volatile than BNRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 167% for Brenmiller Energy Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -532. 8% for Brenmiller Energy Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUX leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -35. 9% for Brenmiller Energy Ltd — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUX leads at -7. 6% versus -32. 9% for BNRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BNRG or STEM or NRGV or GREE or FLUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brenmiller Energy Ltd (BNRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BNRG: -100. 0%, STEM: -95. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BNRG and STEM and NRGV and GREE and FLUX?
These companies operate in different sectors (BNRG (Utilities) and STEM (Technology) and NRGV (Utilities) and GREE (Financial Services) and FLUX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BNRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.