Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $23.52B | $150.63B | $19.25B | $73.68B | $108.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.86B | $63.31B | $2.23B | $14.92B | $12.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.13B | $7.49B | $-3.19B | $4.42B | $4.34B |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 69.3% | -13.9% | 84.5% | 86.3% |
| Operating Margin | -45.9% | 23.4% | -153.3% | 24.3% | 39.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.9x | — | 15.3x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $267M | $67.42B | $1.92B | $2.71B | $3.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.67B | $1.14B | $2.60B | $3.12B | $5.09B |
BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioNTech SE (BNTX) | 100 | 187.8 | +87.8% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 147.6 | +47.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BNTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 22.2x)
- Beta 0.54 vs MRNA's 1.82
MRNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +101.7% vs VRTX's -2.3%
REGN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.43 vs VRTX's 2.68
VRTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 382.6% 10Y total return vs BNTX's 5.7%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
- 35.4% margin vs MRNA's -143.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs MRNA's -143.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs MRNA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +101.7% vs VRTX's -2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -26.1% |
BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
PFE leads 3 • BNTX leads 0 • MRNA leads 0 • REGN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 28.5x MRNA's $2.2B. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRNA's -143.6%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $63.3B | $2.2B | $14.9B | $12.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$931M | $21.0B | -$3.2B | $4.2B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.1B | $7.5B | -$3.2B | $4.4B | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $277M | $9.5B | -$1.6B | $4.2B | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +69.3% | -13.9% | +84.5% | +86.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -45.9% | +23.4% | -153.3% | +24.3% | +39.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.6% | +11.8% | -143.6% | +29.6% | +35.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +15.0% | -71.1% | +27.9% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.5% | +5.4% | +2.6% | +19.0% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -9.5% | -34.9% | -7.2% | +61.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 38% valuation discount to VRTX's 27.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.70x vs VRTX's 3.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.5B | $150.6B | $19.3B | $73.7B | $108.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.8B | $216.9B | $18.6B | $73.3B | $106.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.55x | 19.47x | -6.69x | 17.09x | 27.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.94x | — | 15.35x | 22.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.70x | 3.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.66x | — | 17.78x | 21.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.26x | 2.41x | 9.90x | 5.14x | 8.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 1.74x | 2.18x | 2.46x | 5.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 74.19x | 16.60x | — | 18.06x | 33.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX delivers a 23.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MRNA. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFE's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs MRNA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.0% | +8.3% | -36.7% | +14.3% | +23.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +3.6% | -26.6% | +11.1% | +17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.3% | +7.5% | -26.1% | +8.9% | +23.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +9.0% | -27.6% | +10.2% | +23.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.78x | 0.22x | 0.09x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7.4B | $66.3B | -$679M | -$412M | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.7B | $1.1B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $267M | $67.4B | $1.9B | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -62.15x | 4.02x | -1803.00x | 108.44x | 488.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $19,767 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,975 for MRNA. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +101.7% total return vs VRTX's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRTX at 7.3% vs MRNA's -28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | +6.9% | +57.3% | -8.5% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.2% | +23.7% | +101.7% | +27.1% | -2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | -18.4% | -63.2% | -5.1% | +23.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.2% | -13.3% | -70.2% | +43.6% | +97.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +568.1% | +29.6% | +161.0% | +90.0% | +382.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.9% | -6.6% | -28.3% | -1.7% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRNA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs BNTX's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.54x | 1.82x | 0.81x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $124.00 | $28.75 | $59.55 | $821.11 | $507.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.52 | $21.97 | $22.28 | $476.49 | $362.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +92.1% | +81.5% | +86.4% | +83.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 44.2 | 47.0 | 44.9 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 33.3M | 6.9M | 631K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BNTX as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", MRNA as "Hold", REGN as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for BNTX (target: $137) vs -25.8% for MRNA (target: $36). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $137.13 | $27.27 | $36.00 | $865.68 | $552.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 39 | 27 | 48 | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.5% | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.72 | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +1.9% |
VRTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
BNTX vs PFE vs MRNA vs REGN vs VRTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the stronger pick with 9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BioNTech SE (BNTX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +97.
7%, compared to -70. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +568. 1% versus PFE's +29. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Moderna, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning MRNA is approximately 234% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for Pfizer Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is pulling ahead at 9.
6% versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for BioNTech SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRTX leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -145. 2% for Moderna, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -158. 1% for MRNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc. (PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BNTX: 47. 4% to $137. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BNTX, MRNA, VRTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BNTX or PFE or MRNA or REGN or VRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 6. 5% yield). Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +29. 6%, MRNA: +161. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BNTX and PFE and MRNA and REGN and VRTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BNTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PFE pays a dividend while BNTX, MRNA, REGN, VRTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.