Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Entertainment
Leisure
Leisure
BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Leisure | Entertainment | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $38M | $2.32B | $374.00B | $244M | $3.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $2.45B | $45.18B | $299M | $1.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $23M | $10.98B | $-34M | $229M |
| Gross Margin | 73.0% | 52.0% | 48.5% | 83.2% | 54.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 5.5% | 29.5% | 7.8% | 29.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 36.5x | 24.8x | 10.9x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $1.98B | $14.46B | $525M | $443M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $1.04B | $9.03B | $46M | $346M |
BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Beachbody Compa… (BODI) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Peloton Interactive… (PTON) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 170.5 | +70.5% |
| Xponential Fitness,… (XPOF) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) | 100 | 58.5 | -41.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BODI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +186.6% vs PLNT's -56.7%
Among these 5 stocks, PTON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs PLNT's 203.6%
- PEG 0.75 vs PLNT's 1.80
- 15.9% revenue growth vs BODI's -39.9%
XPOF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.94, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PLNT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, current ratio 2.11x
- Beta 0.31, yield 0.0%, current ratio 2.11x
- Beta 0.31 vs XPOF's 1.94
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs BODI's -39.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.75 vs 1.80 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs XPOF's -11.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs XPOF's 1.94 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +186.6% vs PLNT's -56.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs XPOF's -9.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs 75.0% |
BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
BODI leads 1 • XPOF leads 1 • PTON leads 0 • PLNT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NFLX and PLNT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 179.5x BODI's $252M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPOF's -11.3%. On growth, PLNT holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $2.4B | $45.2B | $299M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $156M | $30.1B | $35M | $568M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $23M | $11.0B | -$34M | $229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $401M | $9.5B | -$3M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.0% | +52.0% | +48.5% | +83.2% | +54.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +5.5% | +29.5% | +7.8% | +29.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +0.9% | +24.3% | -11.3% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +16.4% | +20.9% | -1.1% | +19.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.7% | +1.1% | +17.6% | -21.0% | +21.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +150.0% | +31.1% | +79.1% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BODI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, PLNT trades at a 52% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs PLNT's 1.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $2.3B | $374.0B | $244M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $3.3B | $379.4B | $723M | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -34.32x | -18.87x | 34.89x | -4.45x | 16.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.47x | 24.80x | 10.90x | 13.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.06x | — | 1.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.09x | 60.85x | 12.61x | 7.89x | 6.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.93x | 8.28x | 0.78x | 2.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.13x | — | 14.32x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.21x | 7.16x | 39.53x | 9.86x | 13.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-11 for BODI. BODI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLNT scores 9/9 vs XPOF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | — | +41.3% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +1.1% | +19.8% | -9.5% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +46.7% | -3.9% | +29.8% | +75.0% | +35.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | -2.6% | +30.5% | +30.3% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | — | 0.54x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $937M | $5.4B | $479M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $1.0B | $9.0B | $46M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.0B | $14.5B | $525M | $443M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.61x | 1.52x | 17.33x | -0.24x | 6.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $279 for BODI. Over the past 12 months, BODI leads with a +186.6% total return vs PLNT's -56.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs XPOF's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.4% | -7.5% | -3.0% | -18.5% | -59.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +186.6% | -18.9% | -23.6% | -22.6% | -56.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.4% | -30.0% | +166.5% | -77.4% | -38.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -93.2% | +75.2% | -46.6% | -42.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -78.0% | +875.3% | -46.6% | +203.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.3% | -11.2% | +38.6% | -39.1% | -15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BODI and PLNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPOF's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BODI currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs PLNT's 38.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.89x | 0.39x | 1.94x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.79 | $9.20 | $134.12 | $11.14 | $114.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.38 | $3.65 | $75.01 | $3.83 | $37.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +61.5% | +65.8% | +58.7% | +38.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 57.4 | 35.3 | 48.4 | 32.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 72K | 13.1M | 44.0M | 626K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
XPOF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTON as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", XPOF as "Buy", PLNT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 170.8% upside for PLNT (target: $119) vs 22.3% for XPOF (target: $8). XPOF is the only dividend payer here at 2.50% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.10 | $116.29 | $8.00 | $119.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 40 | 99 | 14 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.5% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.16 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +14.2% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BODI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BODI vs PTON vs NFLX vs XPOF vs PLNT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 9% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT?
On trailing P/E, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Xponential Fitness, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Planet Fitness, Inc. 's 1. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -97. 2% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus BODI's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Xponential Fitness, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XPOF is approximately 520% more volatile than PLNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -39. 9% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beachbody Company, Inc. grew EPS 96. 1% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -10. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLNT leads at 29. 8% versus -1. 5% for PTON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLNT leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Planet Fitness, Inc. 's 1. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 36. 5x for Peloton Interactive, Inc. — 25. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLNT: 170. 8% to $119. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT?
In this comparison, XPOF (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BODI, PTON, NFLX, PLNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BODI or PTON or NFLX or XPOF or PLNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, PTON: -78. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BODI and PTON and NFLX and XPOF and PLNT?
These companies operate in different sectors (BODI (Communication Services) and PTON (Consumer Cyclical) and NFLX (Communication Services) and XPOF (Consumer Cyclical) and PLNT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BODI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; XPOF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLNT is a small-cap deep-value stock. XPOF pays a dividend while BODI, PTON, NFLX, PLNT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.