Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Food Distribution
Packaged Foods
Grocery Stores
BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution | Packaged Foods | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $7M | $75M | $3.35B | $1.22B | $41.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $1.51B | $31.54B | $1.45B | $147.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-544M | $-78M | $91M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 25.8% | 20.0% | 13.3% | 34.0% | 22.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | -31.8% | 0.3% | 14.4% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 20.4x | 7.4x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $779M | $3.45B | $304M | $24.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $54M | $44M | $98M | $3.33B |
BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bon Natural Life Li… (BON) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| United Natural Food… (UNFI) | 100 | 141.5 | +41.5% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 171.3 | +71.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BON lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, HAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UNFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.02
- +92.0% vs SMPL's -65.8%
SMPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 3.64x
- 9.0% revenue growth vs BON's -21.7%
KR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 106.5% 10Y total return vs UNFI's 49.7%
- 2.1% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs BON's -21.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs HAIN's 2.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.0% vs SMPL's -65.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -23.7% |
BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
UNFI leads 1 • KR leads 1 • BON leads 0 • HAIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KR is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.6B annually — 3472.7x BON's $43M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, KR holds the edge at +1.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $1.5B | $31.5B | $1.4B | $147.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$430M | $417M | $231M | $5.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$544M | -$78M | $91M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $5M | $395M | $174M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +20.0% | +13.3% | +34.0% | +22.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | -31.8% | +0.3% | +14.4% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -36.1% | -0.2% | +6.3% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.1% | +0.3% | +1.3% | +12.0% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.5% | -6.7% | -2.6% | -0.3% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -11.3% | +7.4% | -31.6% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 72% valuation discount to KR's 42.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UNFI's 23.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $75M | $3.3B | $1.2B | $41.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $800M | $6.8B | $1.4B | $62.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.67x | -0.11x | -26.69x | 12.02x | 42.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 20.43x | 7.39x | 12.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.50x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 23.29x | 5.89x | 10.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 0.05x | 0.11x | 0.84x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 0.13x | 2.03x | 0.69x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.01x | 7.74x | 12.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KR delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs BON's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -164.7% | -5.0% | +5.2% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.4% | -36.8% | -1.0% | +3.7% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | -23.7% | -0.5% | +8.1% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | -29.2% | -0.6% | +9.4% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.64x | 2.22x | 0.17x | 4.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $725M | $3.4B | $206M | $21.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $54M | $44M | $98M | $3.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $779M | $3.5B | $304M | $24.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.53x | -8.60x | 0.47x | 6.77x | 2.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UNFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KR five years ago would be worth $18,320 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for BON. Over the past 12 months, UNFI leads with a +92.0% total return vs SMPL's -65.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UNFI at 24.8% vs BON's -79.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.8% | -37.1% | +56.6% | -37.3% | +4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.9% | -57.1% | +92.0% | -65.8% | -6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -96.3% | +94.6% | -68.3% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -98.4% | +47.3% | -64.4% | +83.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -98.6% | +49.7% | +2.2% | +106.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -79.8% | -66.5% | +24.8% | -31.8% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UNFI and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNFI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 2.19x | 1.02x | 0.34x | -0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.40 | $2.22 | $52.68 | $36.92 | $76.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.13 | $0.55 | $20.78 | $10.21 | $58.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.3% | +29.7% | +99.3% | +33.2% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.3 | 47.0 | 60.2 | 41.0 | 41.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 1.2M | 696K | 2.8M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAIN as "Hold", UNFI as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", KR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.3% upside for HAIN (target: $1) vs -24.2% for UNFI (target: $40). KR is the only dividend payer here at 2.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.17 | $39.67 | $18.33 | $74.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 43 | 24 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +4.2% | +6.5% |
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UNFI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BON vs HAIN vs UNFI vs SMPL vs KR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 7% for Bon Natural Life Limited (BON). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
0x versus The Kroger Co. at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR?
Over the past 5 years, The Kroger Co.
(KR) delivered a total return of +83. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for Bon Natural Life Limited (BON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KR returned +106. 5% versus BON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 65β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 19β — meaning HAIN is approximately -436% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -21. 7% for Bon Natural Life Limited (BON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Natural Foods, Inc. grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.
4x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for United Natural Foods, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAIN: 77. 3% to $1. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR?
In this comparison, KR (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BON, HAIN, UNFI, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BON or HAIN or UNFI or SMPL or KR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 65), 2. 1% yield, +106. 5% 10Y return). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +106. 5%, HAIN: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BON and HAIN and UNFI and SMPL and KR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UNFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KR pays a dividend while BON, HAIN, UNFI, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.