Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.97B | $125M | $53M | $2.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $554M | $660M | $1.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $-17M | $-10M | $206M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 29.7% | 32.2% | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | -3.5% | -2.4% | 20.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.3x | — | — | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $563M | $170M | $146M | $326M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $46M | $20M | $267M |
BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boot Barn Holdings,… (BOOT) | 100 | 760.6 | +660.6% |
| Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.8% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOOT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs BKE's 225.7%
- PEG 0.77 vs BKE's 1.01
- 14.6% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
TLYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 1.25x
- Beta 0.79 vs BOOT's 1.68
- +232.8% vs CATO's +27.5%
CATO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 18.7%
- Beta 0.88, yield 18.7%, current ratio 1.19x
- 18.7% yield, vs BKE's 7.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BKE is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 16.1% margin vs TLYS's -3.2%
- 20.6% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs TLYS's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs BOOT's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 18.7% yield, vs BKE's 7.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +232.8% vs CATO's +27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.0% |
BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOOT leads 1 • TLYS leads 0 • CATO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 3.5x TLYS's $554M. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLYS's -3.2%. On growth, BOOT holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $554M | $660M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $297M | -$9M | -$5M | $282M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | -$17M | -$10M | $206M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$141M | $3M | -$7M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +29.7% | +32.2% | +48.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -3.5% | -2.4% | +20.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -3.2% | -1.5% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +0.6% | -1.1% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +5.3% | +6.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.2% | +121.6% | +64.6% | +9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CATO and BKE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, BKE trades at a 52% valuation discount to BOOT's 27.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOOT offers better value at 0.95x vs BKE's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $125M | $53M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $249M | $178M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.78x | -7.17x | -3.01x | 13.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.26x | — | — | 12.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.95x | — | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.10x | — | — | 10.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 0.23x | 0.08x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.44x | 1.48x | 0.35x | 6.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 13.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-21 for TLYS. BOOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLYS's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TLYS scores 6/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | -21.3% | -5.8% | +44.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | -5.3% | -2.2% | +20.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | -6.0% | -6.7% | +38.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | -8.5% | -9.6% | +35.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 2.00x | 0.90x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493M | $124M | $126M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $46M | $20M | $267M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $563M | $170M | $146M | $326M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 159.63x | — | -1.77x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOOT five years ago would be worth $21,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,961 for CATO. Over the past 12 months, TLYS leads with a +232.8% total return vs CATO's +27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOOT at 31.6% vs CATO's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +105.9% | -2.7% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +232.8% | +27.5% | +57.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.9% | -46.2% | -52.4% | +93.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.0% | -51.1% | -60.4% | +63.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1960.2% | +61.9% | -72.3% | +225.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | -18.7% | -21.9% | +24.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TLYS and BKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOOT's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs CATO's 59.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.79x | 0.88x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.25 | $5.52 | $4.92 | $61.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.54 | $0.57 | $2.26 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.7% | +75.4% | +59.3% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 50.2 | 48.6 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 616K | 1.4M | 60K | 395K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TLYS and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOOT as "Buy", TLYS as "Hold", BKE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 128.4% upside for TLYS (target: $10) vs 1.2% for BKE (target: $53). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.71% vs BKE's 7.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $231.50 | $9.50 | — | $53.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 17 | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.7% | +7.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.55 | $3.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.4% | 0.0% |
BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BOOT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BOOT vs TLYS vs CATO vs BKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE?
On trailing P/E, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. at 27. 8x. On forward P/E, The Buckle, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 77x versus The Buckle, Inc. 's 1. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE?
Over the past 5 years, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) delivered a total return of +119. 0%, compared to -60. 4% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOOT returned +1960% versus CATO's -72. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tilly's, Inc.
(TLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning BOOT is approximately 112% more volatile than TLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tilly's, Inc. grew EPS 62. 3% year-over-year, compared to -11. 6% for The Buckle, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOOT leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE?
The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -3. 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus -4. 2% for CATO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKE leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus The Buckle, Inc. 's 1. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLYS: 128. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
7% yield), BKE (7. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BOOT, TLYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOOT or TLYS or CATO or BKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 5% yield, +225. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +225. 7%, TLYS: +61. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOOT and TLYS and CATO and BKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BOOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TLYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BKE is a small-cap deep-value stock. CATO, BKE pay a dividend while BOOT, TLYS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.