Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $866M | $7.15B | $33.67B | $4.56B | $22.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $584M | $1.92B | $19.93B | $1.90B | $16.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $527M | $4.40B | $395M | $1.77B |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 36.9% | 37.2% | 37.5% | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 27.2% | 25.0% | 26.7% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 15.0x | 10.1x | 17.9x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $224M | $2.73B | $100M | $4.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $163M | $993M | $52M | $3.96B |
BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowhead Specialty H… (BOW) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| Kinsale Capital Gro… (KNSL) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| RLI Corp. (RLI) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.3%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
KNSL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.2%
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs BOW's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
- 9.1% ROA vs BOW's 2.6%, ROIC 26.6% vs 20.5%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- PEG 0.35 vs RLI's 0.88
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 17.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.88
RLI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, MKL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 17.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.88 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs BOW's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.0% vs KNSL's -32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs BOW's 2.6%, ROIC 26.6% vs 20.5% |
BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOW leads 1 • KNSL leads 0 • RLI leads 0 • MKL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 34.1x BOW's $584M. KNSL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOW's 10.0%. On growth, BOW holds the edge at +26.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $584M | $1.9B | $19.9B | $1.9B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $533M | $5.2B | $512M | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $527M | $4.4B | $395M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $342M | $1.0B | $6.1B | $551M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +36.9% | +37.2% | +37.5% | +61.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +27.2% | +25.0% | +26.7% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +27.5% | +22.1% | +20.8% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +58.6% | +52.9% | +30.7% | +29.0% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +10.2% | +7.3% | +4.0% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | -100.0% | +39.0% | -11.8% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ACGL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 51% valuation discount to BOW's 16.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACGL offers better value at 0.29x vs RLI's 0.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $866M | $7.2B | $33.7B | $4.6B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $632M | $7.2B | $35.4B | $4.6B | $22.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.58x | 14.26x | 8.13x | 11.38x | 10.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.70x | 14.96x | 10.05x | 17.94x | 15.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x | 0.29x | 0.56x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.15x | 11.27x | 6.85x | 8.76x | 7.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.57x | 3.82x | 1.69x | 2.42x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 3.67x | 1.47x | 2.57x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.66x | 7.22x | 5.50x | 7.49x | 8.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KNSL and RLI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNSL delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. RLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKL's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLI scores 8/9 vs BOW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +28.0% | +19.0% | +22.0% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +9.1% | +5.9% | +6.6% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.5% | +26.6% | +15.4% | +22.8% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +14.2% | +11.6% | +9.0% | +14.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.11x | 0.11x | 0.06x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$234M | $61M | $1.7B | $48M | $339M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $163M | $993M | $52M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $224M | $2.7B | $100M | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 42.59x | 47.02x | 34.86x | 80.31x | 12.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,931 for RLI. Over the past 12 months, ACGL leads with a +2.0% total return vs KNSL's -32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKL at 9.4% vs RLI's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.9% | -21.2% | +0.7% | -20.3% | -15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.8% | -32.7% | +2.0% | -29.3% | -4.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | -6.9% | +30.7% | -18.2% | +31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +85.2% | +144.0% | +9.3% | +47.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +1606.7% | +324.0% | +105.0% | +89.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | -2.3% | +9.3% | -6.5% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACGL and RLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLI is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKL's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs KNSL's 60.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.29x | 0.02x | -0.01x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.99 | $512.76 | $103.39 | $77.24 | $2207.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.23 | $293.78 | $82.45 | $48.66 | $1719.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +60.2% | +91.4% | +64.2% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 26.3 | 46.3 | 23.5 | 34.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 256K | 1.9M | 675K | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNSL and RLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOW as "Buy", KNSL as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", RLI as "Hold", MKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for KNSL (target: $433) vs 8.3% for MKL (target: $1950). For income investors, RLI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.28% vs KNSL's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.33 | $433.00 | $104.00 | $56.33 | $1950.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 13 | 34 | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.0% | +5.3% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 | $0.02 | $2.62 | $48.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +5.6% | 0.0% | +1.9% |
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BOW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
BOW vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI vs MKL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.
(BOW) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. (BOW) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arch Capital Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +9. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNSL returned +1607% versus BOW's +10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RLI Corp.
(RLI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Markel Corporation's 0. 44β — meaning MKL is approximately -7532% more volatile than RLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RLI Corp. (RLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 23% for Markel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.
(BOW) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. grew EPS 23. 3% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOW leads at 43. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL?
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 9. 8% for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNSL leads at 33. 8% versus 12. 2% for BOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 9x for RLI Corp. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNSL: 40. 2% to $433. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL?
In this comparison, RLI (5.
3% yield), MKL (2. 7% yield), KNSL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BOW, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOW or KNSL or ACGL or RLI or MKL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), +1607% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNSL: +1607%, BOW: +10. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOW and KNSL and ACGL and RLI and MKL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; KNSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. RLI, MKL pay a dividend while BOW, KNSL, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.